Eat triglycerides

Dietary fats, from olive oil to cocoa butter to beef tallow, are made of triglycerides.

Triglycerides are simply three ("tri-") fatty acids attached to a glycerol backbone. Glycerol is a simple 3-carbon molecule that readily binds fatty acids. Fatty acids, of course, can be saturated, polyunsaturated, and monounsaturated.

Once ingested, the action of the pancreatic enzyme, pancreatic lipase, along with bile acids secreted by the gallbladder, remove triglycerides from glycerol. Triglycerides pass through the intestinal wall and are "repackaged" into large complex triglyceride-rich (about 90% triglycerides) molecules called chylomicrons, which then pass into the lymphatic system, then to the bloodstream. The liver takes up chylomicrons, removes triglycerides which are then repackaged into triglyceride-rich very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL).

So eating triglycerides increases blood levels of triglycerides, repackaged as chylomicrons and VLDL.

Many physicians are frightened of dietary triglycerides, i.e, fats, for fear it will increase blood levels of triglycerides. It's true: Consuming triglycerides does indeed increase blood levels of triglycerides--but only a little bit. Following a fat-rich meal of, say, a 3-egg omelet with 2 tablespoons of olive oil and 2 oz whole milk mozzarella cheese (total 55 grams triglycerides), blood triglycerides will increase modestly. A typical response would be an increase from 60 mg/dl to 80 mg/dl--an increase, but quite small.

Counterintuitively, it's the foods that convert to triglycerides in the liver that send triglycerides up, not 20 mg/dl, but 200, 400, or 1000 mg/dl or more. What foods convert to triglycerides in the liver? Carbohydrates.

After swallowing a piece of multigrain bread, for instance, carbohydrates are released by salivary and gastric amylase, yielding glucose molecules. Glucose is rapidly absorbed through the intestinal tract and into the liver. The liver is magnificently efficient at storing carbohydrate calories by converting them to the body's principal currency of energy, triglycerides, via the process of de novo lipogenesis, the alchemy of converting glucose into triglycerides for storage. The effect is not immediate; it may require many hours for the liver to do its thing, increasing blood triglycerides many hours after the carbohydrate meal.

This explains why people who follow low-fat diets typically have high triglyceride levels--despite limited ingestion of triglycerides. When I cut my calories from fat to 10% or less--a very strict low-fat diet--my triglycerides are 350 mg/dl. When I slash my carbohydrates to 40-50 grams per day but ingest unlimited triglycerides like olive oil, raw nuts, whole milk cheese, fish oil and fish, etc., my triglycerides are 50 mg/dl.

Don't be afraid of triglycerides. But be very careful with the foods that convert to triglycerides: carbohydrates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (31) -

  • Kurt

    6/8/2011 2:51:47 AM |

    There must be genetic variations, though, as my triglycerides have measured between 78 and 90 on every test since 1993. For the past two years, I've been eating a 20% fat diet (with about 50% carbs), and on my latest VAP test, my triglycerides were 78. The diet, by the way, lowered my LDL 30%.

  • Ian Goldsmid

    6/8/2011 2:55:47 AM |

    Dr. Davis

    Could you please clarify:

    If I have one slice of gluten free mixed grain /seed toast - and very liberally heap Organic Coconut Oil & Almond Butter on it - am I still going to get the exaggerated carbohydrate to triglyceride conversion effect from the toast?

    Thanks, IJG

  • Gene K

    6/8/2011 3:28:45 AM |

    Dr Davis,

    How much TG-rich foods is it safe for APOE 4 people to consume? Will this amount depend on their fasting TG? Will it be per meal or a day's total?

    Thank you.

  • Markus Damian

    6/8/2011 7:16:16 AM |

    I think this article is excatly on target- I ate a low-fat, high-carb vegetarian diet for years, and at one point my measured triglyceride levels were > 300. After I started omitting most refined carbs from my diet (and upping my fat/protein intake correspondingly), my last reading has been 88. So, for me at least, dietary intake of triglycerides is not substantially related to blood levels.

  • Markus D

    6/8/2011 7:32:02 AM |

    ... having said that, there is something which I don't quite understand. Given that virtually the entire human population is on a high-carb feast, it must be that some of us react differently to high-carb diet than others, otherwise everyone would have elevated triglyc levels, right? My mother, who is certainly genetically quite close to me, eats a high-carb, low-fat diet, and her triglyceride levels are normal ...  Many thanks, M.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/9/2011 12:18:07 AM |

    EPA (eicosa-pentaenoic fatty acid)  an omega-3  poly-unsaturated fatty acid reduces the amount of glucose that is made into tri-glycerides ("trigs") , thus decreasing de-novo lipo-genesis put out by the liver.  When I added daily concentrated fish oil  with 1,500 mg EPA & 750 mg DHA to my moderate carb diet my NMR  tested measurement of trigs went from 90 mg/dL down to 42 mg trigs/dL (tests  were 4 months apart).  

    EPA also increases the amount of insulin related glucose transporters inside skeletal muscle cells, which allays insulin resistance;  it (EPA) induces the skeletal muscles to "burn" more glucose for ATP energy  in oxidative phosphorylation , which decreases irritating lactate output that contributes to body "aches".  Insulin in circulation can then also work as a co-fact0r with EPA,  together they go on to increase functional  leptin  levels  (leptin = anti-appetite);  thus  we get less impulse to "graze"   between meals on  carbs that make  trigs.

  • carb sane

    6/9/2011 11:57:11 AM |

    Actually, it has been established that DNL is NOT a major source of fatty acids in VLDL.

    http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2011/05/where-do-triglycerides-come-from-part-i.html

  • majkinetor

    6/9/2011 1:49:40 PM |

    Actually, its around 20%

    http://ajpendo.physiology.org/content/286/4/E577.full

  • majkinetor

    6/9/2011 1:49:59 PM |

    Nice. I didn't know that. Thats pretty big amount of EPA/DHA, it is therapeutic amount often used for COX-2 inhibition.

    Can you tell more about the dosage ? Did you try smaller dose ? Is it fish oil or fish capsule or simply fish ? What are you thoughts about potential problems with PUFA and oxidation in regard to fish oil ?

  • carb sane

    6/9/2011 5:05:24 PM |

    Firstly, that's not about VLDL.  Secondly, that means around 80% comes from dietary fat.    Did you read my link?

  • Might-0'chondri-AL

    6/9/2011 6:15:27 PM |

    Hi majkinetor,
    I only went from no fish oil supplementation as an experiment to taking 1 tsp of Natural Factor's "pharmaceutical grade"  (  concentrated Canadian product's total fish oil=4,400 mg.  with 2,630 Omega 3 fatty acids of which 1,500 = EPA & 750 = DHA)  taken, as free  poured liquid along with morning food and evening food in 1/2 tsp measuring spoon slurps. Intake  of liquid oil was at the same time ate carbs , and carb intake was similar for when had 1st measured trigs when wasn't supplementing with fish oil  .  

    I personally don't think PUFA oxidation is an issue in diets that have lots of substrate for gut bacteria to make short chain 4 carbon fatty acid butyrate. It (butyrate) up-regulates many distinct  GST (glutathione S-transferase) genes;  these go on to tackle multiple lipid peroxidation by-products  (ex:  activity neutralizes 4-hydroxy- nonenal &  trans-alk-enals/dienals ),  while  micro-somal GST promotes the glutathione conjugation to electro-philes  which then can act to decrease lipid hydro-peroxide activity.

  • majkinetor

    6/10/2011 7:25:50 AM |

    Ah, sorry, I missread your post.

  • majkinetor

    6/10/2011 7:30:08 AM |

    Secondly, that means around 80% comes from dietary fat
    Not at all.
    80% from dietary fat AND cho.

  • Jimmy

    6/10/2011 11:11:24 AM |

    Might: Do you live in Canada?
    Jim

  • Helen

    6/10/2011 11:25:24 AM |

    M-Al,

    I used to take fish oil, but now that I'm measuring my glucose daily, I find that even a small dose immediately raises my fasting glucose 10-15mg, and somewhat worsens my post-prandial readings.  My own observation is in keeping a study that showed that prediabetic women's glucose control was worsened by a fish oil supplement.  (I don't have the link handy.)  Can you explain?

    I have the same troubles with modest supplements of vitamin C and niacin, though I'm sure for different reasons.  I find it interesting, and I don't mean that in any coded way, that two of Dr. Davis' recommended supplements  (fish oil and niacin) impair glucose control in me and in some studies.  I am wondering if this might explain in part his advice to shun carbs.  In the context of those supplements, carbs are not well tolerated.

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/10/2011 12:12:00 PM |

    Several commenters make the point that there is genetic variation in susceptibility to triglyceride intake and carbohydrate intake.

    Absolutely. Two people on the same diet can have wildly different results. Part of this is attributable to apo E genotype, apo C genotype, lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase genotypes, among others. Body weight and previous eating habits will also enter the equation. However, in most people increased triglyceride intake does not result in substantial increase in serum triglycerides.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/10/2011 9:59:19 PM |

    Hi Helen,
    I've heard some respond as you mention;  I wonder if they were all overweight during the data collection period, as pre-diabetic could imply.  In your circumstances (ie: blood glucose goes up with supplements)  it would be instructive to know if  you've a tendency for excess weight.

    My own niacin use went from none to 3x per day of 500 mg.  niacin taken with meals;   my own 2011 NMR lipid tests done 4 months apart were as follows.  Without any niacin fasting NMR cholesterol test results:  LDL = 139,  HDL=45,  total number of LDL particles  = 1,676,  with the number of small LDL particles  = 1,021 nmol/dL .  As for NMR cholesterol test with 1,500 mg daily total  niacin :  LDL = 100, HDL = 64,  total number of LDL particles = 976 , with the number of small LDL particles = nmol/dL.

    The nice plunge in small LDL doesn't seem to be due to a massive restriction of carbs;  in fact,  both my  HbA1c  and fasting serum glucose test result ciphers  went up slightly after I had  instituted niacin &  EPA/DHA fish oil  (started both at same time).   Incidentally,  I've never had  weight gain problems  and unintentionally lost 10 pounds I didn't intend to  since started taking the fish oil;  losing so much small LDL was more than thought possible and maybe wasn't 100% due to the niacin  (also daily  added  6,000 IU vitamin D3 from none, taken as 2,000 IU  with each meal).

    So,  before you decide that niacin & EPA/DHA supplements driving up your post-prandial glucose is positively detrimental it might be good to have your own baseline data (ie:  NMR for cholesterol & HbA1c for accretion of  blood sugar) .  If you are in the USA you can get a valid blood draw order in ANY state at all and the emailed results by using  cheapest online arrangement from summitcountymedicalsociety.prepaidlab.com ;  their doctor orders the blood test for you and,  of course, I have no financial interest in this .

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/10/2011 10:04:42 PM |

    edit,
    see 2nd paragraph's last sentence to Helen above, missing number in last set of data is for number of small LDL nmol/dL and should be 96 (ninety-six) ... in other words  that data shows that with niacin the  small LDL  "plunged" to 96 from being 1,021 nmol/dL without niacin supplementation.

  • Helen

    6/11/2011 5:27:07 AM |

    Hi M-Al,

    I'm different from a lot of visitors to this blog in that I have never had cholesterol problems.  I don't remember my exact numbers but my HDL and LDL split has been deemed "ideal," and my triglycerides range from 44-48, with total cholesterol being about 157.  

    My current BMI is 20 or less (haven't checked the charts lately) and my highest ever was 25, about a year ago.  Generally, I've been in the 23 range.  So, no, I don't have a propensity to weight gain.  On the other hand, I'm borderline diabetic.  Last year, at my highest BMI, my A1C was 6.4.  On low-carb, it slowly got down to 6.0, and my last test, on low-fat, was also 6.0, although according to my meter readings, taken at least three times a day, it should be 5.3.  I'm definitely right on the border with the diabetes, though have pushed it back some over the past year.  My blood sugar *sometimes* shoots to 200 or over within the first hour of eating (a "diabetic" number, though my endocrinologist says it has to be 200 at two hours to be considered clinical diabetes), but it quickly goes down again.  My liver seems to pump out a lot of glucose.  I tend to have a fasting glucose between 109 and 125.  Sometimes it gets as low as 99.  On low-carb, it ranged from 125 to 145, and was 160 a few times.  

    Needless to say, my biggest concern is my glucose level.  Metformin didn't help, low-carb didn't help much (and definitely made my tolerance for any amount of carbs next to zero - I once went to 198 on a carrot and half an orange, but I don't anymore.  It also gave me heart palpitations, worsened my insomnia, and greatly impaired my exercise tolerance), and I wonder if I'm just stuck with what I've got at this point.  Not that I'm throwing in the towel.  Fortunately, my cholesterol profile has  been ideal, my resting heart rate and blood pressure are low-normal, and my weight is okay without a struggle.  But I'm getting aches and pains in my joints and think the fish oil could help there.

  • Peter

    6/11/2011 1:32:44 PM |

    Dr. Davis, at one point you were concerned that you were eating too many nuts
    because your ratio of omega 3 and 6 was off.  What is your current thinking about the trade-offs?

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/11/2011 10:02:26 PM |

    Hi Helen,
    lost 2 replies, says server error ... sorry

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/11/2011 10:14:46 PM |

    Hmm Helen,
    Sounds like epigenetic or good old genetic polymorphism ... appears that Hexokinase II (HK II) is NOT staying inside skeletal muscle mitochondria and glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P) is working to keep HK II in cell cytosol in a loop,  whereby HK II engenders glycogen output and instigates lots of G-6-P ... that cell has own glucose from glycogen so GLUT 4 (glucose transporters) move too far away to pick up blood glucose  ... liver glycogen  for it's part involves HK IV (glucokinase) and G-6-P too, but may not be root of  your syndrome ... too slow a rate of G-6-P degradation and /or too many carbon or nitrogen terminals on HK II would allow G-6-P to yank HK II  into metabolism cranking out glycogen ...  hey - twice wrote this already.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/12/2011 12:49:42 AM |

    Helen, Hi-
    Metaformin probably did not work for you because it functions to increase glucose uptake by provoking anaerobic glycolysis to create additional glucose demand;   you may already be doing plenty  of anaerobic glycolysis  as a consequence of your extra ordinary local glycogen synthesis.  The carbon from glucose with anaerobic glycolysis engenders a lot of lactate being produced; your aching joints and body pain syndrome fit the profile of excessive lactate in circulation.

    There is no easy way to determine what phase of the G-6-P dynamic with Hexokinase forms is not working normally, if even involved.  When we wean to real food our skeletal muscles start to run glucose metabolism with HK II and GLUT 4,  rather than the HK I and GLUT 1  we started with;  this change over occurs when we  starts to relatively "burn" both carbs and fats  and skeletal muscles develop  their insulin sensitivity.

    I am not  a clinician, and you have your personal physician to guide you; if I had a distorted  HK II  and G-6-P pattern ( that was unresponsive to low carbs)  I would try to end run it,  and not have skeletal muscle cells utilizing glucose to stop ratcheting up G-6-P and short out the negative feedback loop . I'd  significantly increase my consumption of  dietary fat in the explicit form of unheated virgin coconut oil  and fatty fish (for the EPA/DHA);  if taking EPA causes  blood sugar to rise it is probably because the EPA is driving skeletal muscles to "burn" fat , and thus skeletal muscles are using less of the HK II glycogen  which itself then used even less blood glucose as substrate  (ie: EPA  reduces blood glucose commonly used so glucose level in blood measures higher if cell metabolism aberrant  in the manner like I surmise).

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/12/2011 4:28:39 AM |

    Hi Jim,
    Am not  residing in Canada.

  • majkinetor

    6/12/2011 7:04:12 AM |

    Vitamin C can give falsely higher values when measuring bunch of markers, most notably glucose. Its because it is so similar with glucose (very similar net formula, the same transporters in the body - GLUT, its made from glucose in animals etc...)

    About oil, it can only slow down carb absorption and let the body tolerate better. Did you experiment with other fish oil manufacturers ? Perhaps something in the product apart from fish oil makes you feel that way. For instance, ascorbyl palmitate is typical antioxidant used (along with Vitamin E) so this can be responsible for false higher reading.

  • majkinetor

    6/12/2011 7:22:27 AM |

    Helen, did you try megadosing with Vitamin C (~10g per day as frequent as you can). Vitamin C influences beta cells in the pancreas and deficiency is common in diabetes. Scorbutic guinea pigs show defects in insulin metabolism in vitro. Higher glucose levels compete with C for transporter. Add chromium if you didn't. Daily exercise will surely help. Since low carb made your glucose problem worst (most probable is higher hepatic insulin resistance that is consequence of low carb diet) you might try to return some safe starches back (for instance potato or rice) and keep CHO between 50 and 75 g per day.  Ashes and pains in the joint might be consequence of your too low carb diet since carbs are used for joint functions. Carbs are also used for intestinal mucus which so on very low carb you might have some micronutrient deficiencies.

  • Dee

    6/13/2011 7:47:05 PM |

    Have you tried adding D-ribose to your mix of supplements?  It has helped with my muscle aches from exercise.

  • Kris - Health Blog

    6/14/2011 7:52:50 AM |

    It seems that a lot of doctors would do well by going back a few years in time and re-reading Biochem 101.

  • Jim Anderson

    6/14/2011 7:05:22 PM |

    My wife and I have both been following a low-carb eating plan.  For me, that has meant increased fat consumption from the start.  I have felt full and satisfied after meals, and can go longer without feeling hungry.  I have also lost weight steadily.  My wife, however, has had a harder time of it.   She claims that is because women just have a harder time losing weight than men do.  That's true, I guess, in general, but I have also noticed that she seems to be avoiding fat a lot more than I do.  (Well, I don't avoid it at all!)  So she gets hungrier more often.  It is very difficult to overcome years and years of anti-dietary fat propaganda!

  • Joe Lindley

    6/30/2011 2:04:03 PM |

    Yes!  Thanks for the complete explanation of the fats vs. carbs impact.  I'm successfully on a low carb diet now after quitting Atkins years ago because my wife was worried I'd keep over from a heart attack.  With the right information out there now that dietary fat won't hurt you, people can stick to a low carb diet and get enough satiety (food satisfaction) with fats in the diet to stay on a diet.  It's truly been a disaster that the nutrition authorities shooed us away from dietary fats starting in the 1970s.  It's taken decades to get the word out that dietary fats are OK.  I published a nostalgic post on this about how Barney Fife got it right back in 1963:  http://bit.ly/m5eAhE

  • James Roberts

    7/30/2011 12:59:43 AM |

    Great post, great site.  I made my way to focusing on triglycerides by starting with Lipitor.  I had some bad though serious side effects (mostly insomnia),  so I dropped it and worked really hard on reducing fat intake.  That pretty much worked, but surprise (to me)... triglycerides went way up.  Now that I've also worked on cutting empty calories my levels are down to borderline.  Once you make it to a genuinely healthy diet everything seems to work out Wink
    cheers,
    James

Loading
Heart Scan debate

Heart Scan debate

A few years back when the book form of Track Your Plaque was first released, I did a bunch of radio and interviews to raise awareness of the book and of CT heart scanning in general.

I'd forgotten about this interview I did for National Public Radio (NPR), in which I debate Dr. Graboys from Harvard. Though I've had this debate countless other times, usually on a less formal basis, I didn't know what to expect at the start of the interview. After all, I knew of Dr. Graboys' reputation as a respected Harvard cardiologist. So I was expecting that at least he would argue that, being relatively new at the time, CT heart scanning was largely unproven in large clinical trials. (This was not entirely true then, however, as at least 1000 trials had already been performed, many of them involving thousands of participants. However, despite that much validation, the concept of CT heart scanning had still not entered the consciousness of most practicing physicians. After all, heart scanning is not part of the "crash and repair" equation that most have invested their career in.)

Heart Hawk re-discovered the debate, still on the NPR website. So here it is. When I re-listened to the debate, I was surprised at how little Dr. Graboys had to offer. He argues that examining left ventricular function should suffice as an important measure of mortality. In other words, if you have experienced a drop in the strength of heart muscle, that can be used to stratify your risk of death.

I tried to convey to the audience (NOT convince Dr. Graboys to believe, as most of my colleagues are stubbornly adherent to their way of thinking until someone tosses a big carrot in front of them) that CT heart scanning provides a means to detect coronary atherosclerosis years, even decades, before questions of mortality (death) became necessary. Heart scanning identifies disease in its early stages so that a program of prevention can be followed and tracked.

Dr. Graboys expressed concern that heart scanning devices could be mis-used to increase hospital procedures. He's absolutely right here. By that same line of thinking, say your crooked auto mechanic on the corner scams most of his customers by doing unnecessary car repairs. Does this mean that we should ban all auto mechanics from repairing cars? I hope not. I believe it does mean that we should all be educated on distinguishing scams from an honest businessman.

Same with heart scans. The key is not to ban heart scanning. We should try to educate the public and physicians to prevent these sorts of scams and decisions based on ignorance from occurring.

Nonetheless, make your own judgments.


CLICK HERE to listen (this is a .ram file so you will need the free RealPlayer to play)

Comments (4) -

  • JT

    7/29/2007 7:49:00 PM |

    you could have been a radio or TV personality!  Glad you became a cardiologist and author instead though.  

    Talking about debates, I occasionally visit the many different debating boards on the internet.  Recently I entered a debate with a couple UK medical students.  The topic was over which country provides the best medical care.  I asked if CT heart scans are being performed in the UK and they replied no and had not heard of this.  

    I don’t mean to catch you up into politics too much, but if you feel comfortable answering, a couple questions I have are: Do know if counties outside of America are planning to add CT heart scannings?  If so do you believe government run health care systems are more likely to implement their use nation wide since profit isn't as large of a motivation?

  • Dr. Davis

    7/30/2007 11:48:00 AM |

    Hi, JT--

    Interesting thoughts.

    There are a number of other countries that do provide CT heart scanning, though many have, from the start, confined their interest to CT angiography. Nearly all of the CT heart scanning for coronary calcification in the published literature originated in the U.S.

    It would indeed be an interesting social observation to know whether different medical systems encourage or discourage heart scanning. Sorry, but I know of no such correlation that has been formally examined.

  • Anonymous

    7/31/2007 2:18:00 AM |

    I recently took a calcium score test at my own expense because my insurance company does not cover the test. When I asked my insurance company why they don't cover it, they referred me to their web site at
    http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/200_299/0228.html

    Under the heading of Calcium Scoring, it says
    However, there is skepticism about the relationship between EBCT calcium scores and the likelihood of coronary events because of the following factors:
    - Calcium does not collect exclusively at sites with severe stenosis
    - EBCT calcium scores do not identify the location of specific vulnerable lesions
    - Substantial non-calcified plaque is frequently present in the absence of coronary artery calcification
    - There are no proven relationships between coronary artery calcification and the probability of plaque rupture.

    At the end it says: An assessment by the Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (Bardach, 2005) concluded: "Most consensus consider EBCT, SCT and MSCT still at their investigational stage for the following: a) detection of coronary artery calcifications as a screening method for asymptomatic subjects with coronary disease; b) detection of coronary artery calcifications in symptomatic patients; and c) assessment of coronary graft viability. No study reported that calcification measuring (plaque characterization) reduces the incidence of coronary events or death."

  • Dr. Davis

    7/31/2007 4:02:00 AM |

    So what else is new?

    Insurance companies are famous for finding every possible means to weasel out of paying for a test that leads to prevention of disease.

    Their fear: Opening the floodgates for all the people who might wish to have the test, a far larger number than those who eventually suffer cardiac catastrophes.

    This is patent nonsense. Anyone who has even begun to read the published experience in CT heart scanning, or has used CT scanning in real life practice, soon begins to realize the absolute folly of the conventional methods of heart disease detection: cholesterol (a miserable failure), stress testing (ask Bill Clinton how well it served him and the thousands of others who experienced heart attacks despite normal stress tests), or death. Take your pick.

Loading
Bait and switch

Bait and switch

When banks compete, you win.”

The TV ad opens with a 60-something man sitting in his living room, talking to a three-piece suit-clad, 30-something banker. The older man is explaining to the dismayed younger man why he’s going to use Lending Tree loan service for a home loan.

“But Dad, I’m you’re son!” the younger whines.

Many of Lending Tree’s clients have collaborated in filing a multi-million dollar class action suit against the company, claiming “bait and switch” tactics. They claim that home buyers are lured by low interest rates or low closing costs on a home loan. Once the buyer concludes the hassle of filling out numerous forms, the suit accuses Lending Tree of making a switch to a costlier loan.

Bait and switch is among the oldest con games around. If you’ve ever bought a car from a car dealer, chances are you’ve had your own little brush with this deception. The ad promises the SUV you’ve wanted for only $299 per month. Only, once you get there, the salesman informs you that only a limited number of special deals were available and they’ve run out. But he’s still got a really good deal right over here!

Most of us recognize that we’ve been hookwinked. Yet we still go along and buy a car from the dealer.

What if it’s not a sleazy salesman behind the pitch, but a physician. If it’s hard to resist the sales pitch at the car dealership, it can be near impossible to ignore the advice of your doctor. But the truth is often loud and clear: in many instances, it is a genuine, bona fide, and fully-certified scam.

Among the most common bait-and-switch heart scams: Your cholesterol is high. The sequence of subsequent testing is well-rehearsed. “Gee, Bob, I’m worried about your risk for heart disease. Let’s schedule you for a nuclear stress test.” The stress test, like 20% or more of them, is “falsely positive,” meaning abnormal even though there’s nothing wrong with you. Another 30% are equivocal, not clearly abnormal but also not clearly normal. Now up to 50% of people tested “need” a heart catheterization in the hospital to clarify this frightening uncertainty. You might end up with a stent or two, even bypass surgery. Your simple $20 cholesterol panel has metamorphosed into $100,000 in hospital procedures. That familiar sequence is followed thousands of times, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

There are times when these heart tests are valuable and provide meaningful answers. Then there's the other half of the time when they provide murky information that can be used for a practitioner's economic advantage.


Copyright 2008 William Davis, MD

Comments (5) -

  • Anonymous

    3/24/2008 2:13:00 AM |

    My former doctor tried to catch me in this scam with everything he could think of including the "death and destruction card."  I continued to resist and got dropped as a patient.

  • Anonymous

    3/24/2008 10:33:00 AM |

    I used to have many gut issues when I was younger and remember suspecting a few doctors trying and probably even succeeding a few times to drum up business for money out of me.  One time in particular I remember saying no to a testing idea that a high strung doctor presented, she wanted to do a liver test that involved an operation.  She became upset with me when i said no, but I stood my ground and later found a better doctor for me to work with.  

    I think there is a chance I ran into a bait and switch heart doctor on the internet not that long ago.         Why many people place blind faith in health care providers isn't something I understand.

  • Anonymous

    9/19/2008 1:58:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis,
       What is the switch part of your scenario?  When a doctor says he is concerned, I presume it means I may have some disease that needs treatment.  Should doctors spend more time describing what positive and negative results mean?  Of course.  In advance of tests?  Of course. But it sounds like you are suggesting that tests be avoided, because treatment may follow.  Or did you mean that some doctors intend to give treatment regardless of test results? What's your point?

  • Anonymous

    4/5/2009 6:43:00 PM |

    I think the post means the test is the bait as in here have a test to see if you have a problem and the switch is an expensive, unnecessary surgery

Loading
Wheat Belly explodes on the scene!

Wheat Belly explodes on the scene!



Wheat Belly is finally available in Barnes and Noble and all major bookstores nationwide! Also available at Amazon. Electronic versions for Nook and Kindle, as well as an audio CD, will also be available.

The notion of Wheat Belly got its start right here on The Heart Scan Blog and the diet developed for the Track Your Plaque program to conquer heart disease and plaque.



Chapters in the book include:

Not Your Grandma's Muffins: The Creation of Modern Wheat
Whence and where did this familiar grain, 4 1/2-foot tall "amber waves of grain," become transformed into a 2-foot tall, high-yield genetically unique plant unfamiliar to humans? And why is this such a bad thing?

Cataracts, Wrinkles, and Dowager's Humps: Wheat and the Aging Process
If you thought that bagels and crackers are just about carbs, think again. Wheat consumption makes you age faster: cataracts, crow's feet, arthritis . . . you name it, wheat's been there, done that and brings you one step closer to the big nursing home in the sky with every bite.

My Particles are Bigger than Your Particles
Why consuming plenty of "healthy whole grains" is the path to heart disease and heart attack and why saying goodbye to them is among the most powerful strategies around for reduction or elimination of risk.

Hello, Intestine: It's Me, Wheat
No discussion of wheat is complete without talking about how celiac disease and other common intestinal ailments, like acid reflux and irritable bowel syndrome, fit into the broader concept of wheat elimination.

Here's a YouTube video introduction to the book and concept posted on the YouTube Wheat Belly Channel. Also, join the discussions on The Wheat Belly Blog and Facebook. Have that last bite of blueberry muffin, because I predict you won't be turning back!

Comments (64) -

  • Bill Davis

    8/30/2011 12:18:20 PM |

    My copy was delivered to my PC Kindle reader first thing this morning. Look forward to reading it. Thanks.
    Bill

  • Guy Jones

    8/30/2011 12:45:33 PM |

    Congratulations Dr. Davis! I just listened to you on Robb Wolf's podcast and I'll be downloading the Kindle version for my iPad this evening. I hope you have a best seller and I hope it starts a trend toward a healthier country.
    Guy

  • Jana Miller

    8/30/2011 2:28:14 PM |

    Congratulations...it's so exciting to read all the breakthroughs you are making with heart disease.I bet the drug companies don't like you to much..hahah.  I enjoyed my almond-flour blueberry muffin this morning...no more wheat at our house. We are actually looking forward to our physicals in a few months.
    Jana

  • Joe Lindley

    8/30/2011 2:50:49 PM |

    Congratulations Dr. Davis.  I have you book tucked away in my Kindle and it looks to be very enlightening.  I've also alerted my followers on Twitter.  I have a personal friend who has been off wheat and sugar for years to reverse pretty serious medical problems, so was a believer even before I found your work.  Best of luck with the release!!

  • Chris

    8/30/2011 3:05:37 PM |

    Congrats!  Looking forward to reading the book!

  • Joe

    8/30/2011 5:09:24 PM |

    Michael:

    There is nothing "easy" about open-heart surgery.  I have many friends, relatives, and colleagues (of my own generation) who have had various bypass operations, and to a man (and a few women), when asked if they'd ever have another one, the answer is no. No way, Jose, in fact. Too much pain, too many "complications," too much reduction in "quality of life," etc.  Plus, valve repair or replacement operations (according to the literature) are also rife with similar "complications," e.g., leakage, mechanical malfunction, etc. Nope, I have no desire to become a cyborg.

    Now, if I was, say, 25, and not 68, maybe I'd think differently about it. I've already outlived the projected average lifespan for a person born in 1943 (63.95 years). I've had a pretty good life, and I have no desire to live as an incapacitated individual, mostly dependent on others for my care, etc. I'm divorced, and have no children, so no one is dependent on my survival. I also have Alzheimer's in the family tree (three uncles and two aunts).

    Plus, Dr. Davis has suggested that vitamin D, for one, may help put off the inevitable for those of us with aortic insufficiency, based on his own clinical experience. It gives me some additional hope that I may be able to fight this off for a few more years, which will give me time to arrange my affairs, etc. And serving as an n=1 experiment, and then seeing what happens, may be helpful to others facing the same decision.

    You said that "no amount of exercise or supplementation and nutrition will correct your current situation." Perhaps you're right, but how do you know that with any degree of certainty? Maybe it won't "correct" the situation, but maybe it will postpone the inevitable? Dr. Davis suggests that it just might do that. And getting  another 5-10 years would be a satisfactory resolution, at least it would for me. Provided I was generally healthy and independent for that entire time, and was physically able to continue the exercise, etc.

    So I hope Dr. Davis will add some additional insight regarding my situation.

    Joe

    PS: Apparently there is only one live thread at a time here.  I wanted to reply to Michael Goroncy in the Bad Fat-Good Fat thread, but this is the only thread that will accept it. I keep getting "500" errors otherwise.

    PPS: I received my copy of the "Wheat Belly" book yesterday.  It's mostly for my brother-in-law, who subsists mostly on cereal, bread, and pasta, and who has a "wheat belly" of growing proportions.  Maybe it'll help him see the light. But I may also learn a few things myself.

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/30/2011 6:29:54 PM |

    Hi, Jana-

    That's okay. I'm not sure I'd like any drug company to be my friend, anyway!

  • James Buch PhD

    8/30/2011 9:38:17 PM |

    Congratulations on the new book and for getting it featured in "Woman's World" cover recently.

    Where else to put a new idea on eating and weight control but in a magazine that for years has featured endless weight loss articles?  I think it is a great move to get exposure there.

    I'll be ordering my book soon, but will be gone for a week long bicycle camping trip as part of my keep in shape because I am too old to fall out of shape and get back easily. Then, when I rest up, I'll want the book.

    I really enjoyed the wheat articles you have posted, and am beginning to feel that my escalating blood glucose reading are linkable to the previous day's carb and wheat content.  However, there is so much variability in the function of my home blood glucose monitors that I can't yet be sure of such associations being real, yet.

  • Princess Dieter

    8/30/2011 11:36:02 PM |

    Bought the Woman's World yesterday. Read it in the pm today. And I Nook-ed WHEAT BELLY about 10 mins ago. Smile Gonna read it after supper.

    Thanks, Doc!

  • Linda

    8/30/2011 11:38:31 PM |

    I also asked this question in the Vit D post from a few days ago.

    I began experiencing tightness and soreness in my hips and lower back this year. Have been low carbing for over three years, and, except for a short period of stupidity earlier this year, have not consumed any flour products. My multi-vitamin contains only 500 IU of D3, so I am adding this to my daily supplementing. Should I start slowly, 1000 IU a day for a month, and slowly increase? Is D3 toxic? BTW I am in my late 60′s, and I do exercise 5-6 days a week as well.
    I do not hang out in doctors' offices unless it is absolutely totally necessary, so I am choosing not to have any testing done.

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/31/2011 12:55:34 AM |

    Hi, Linda--

    The best way to think of vitamin D is as sunlight exposure. However, the vitamin D in your multivitamin is, more than likely, an unabsorbable or poorly absorbed form. It should be taken as gelcap.

    I know of no advantage to doing it slowly. Embrace the D!

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/31/2011 12:59:38 AM |

    Hi, Dr. Buch--

    I am mindful of what Woman's World is, seeing it in the checkout line at the grocery store. Please know that I did not "place" it there; I simply responded to questions posed by the reporter.

    I can, with every confidence, assure you that wheat in the diet exerts outsized effects on blood glucose due to the unique configuration of branching of the glucose polymers in the amylopectin A unique to wheat.

  • michael goroncy

    8/31/2011 2:10:36 AM |

    In reply to Joe
    You are 68 yo....”hope to get another 5-10yrs”
    Gosh! Your attitude is negative and perhaps a different outlook may be the biggest weapon in your arsenal of 'tricks' that you have at the moment. From what you have said..I can't see why you can't be looking at  20-30 yrs more.
    You can run 5k+ 3-4 p/w....I would have to wake up early and hope to get back by sunset to walk 5k.

    My heart problems (self inflicted) are a tad different than yours...
    MI and CAGB at age 37 (25yrs ago) Pumping on LAD and collaterals currently. Treated with medication and a similar nutrition and supplement list as your own.
    Have smoked since 15yo and still do..insane! I know..will make first attempt to quit by years end..simply tired of being breathless and feeling ordinary. Also drink a litre of red wine daily (to take the edge off)
    Needless to say am not qualified to be a mentor to anybody (just sharing thoughts and experiences)

    Now back to you and your 'faulty parachutes'....
    (1) Consult an interventional cardiologist and a holistic cardio man for opinions on surgery (write a list of all your questions beforehand)
    (2) Seek other patients that have been in your position to get their feedback (google away)
    (3) CHD is a scary disease that draws us into a feeling of doom and if you can cross this barrier...zippidy -do-da.

  • Wayne

    8/31/2011 4:21:20 AM |

    If certain farmers started growing the "old" type wheat would this eliminate the problems of  "modern" wheat?
    Maybe some entrepreneurial farmers could fill this niche market at least as far as flour for home use, then we could eat bread without concern. It's hard to completely give up the all the crunchy stuff. Drinking and smoking is easier to quit  (no joke).

  • Stipetic

    8/31/2011 7:50:20 AM |

    Congratulations, Dr. Davis. Looking forward to reading your book.
    BTW, do you know if Europe has switched to the dwarf variety too?

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/31/2011 11:53:29 AM |

    Hi, Stip--

    Yes, most farmers in Europe and Asia, big and small, have converted to the semi-dwarf variant. I'm told this by wheat breeding experts, as well as by Dr. Gary Vocke at the USDA, who collects all data relative to wheat worldwide.

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/31/2011 11:55:47 AM |

    Hi, Wayne--

    Yes, it can be difficult psychologically for many.

    Wheat in all its forms has been a problem for as long as humans have eaten it. We have records suggesting, for instance, that celiac disease was described in 100 AD. The modern forms have made it much, much worse, however.

    I believe that a return to the forms of wheat--einkorn, emmer, non-genetically-manipulated "heritage" cultivars of wheat--would be far better, though it would not be perfect since some people will still respond with abnormal immune responses, while others react to the carbohydrates. But it would indeed be somewhat better.

  • Mike Larocque

    8/31/2011 3:00:36 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis,
    I just read Tom's review over at his 'Fat Head' blog and I'm looking forward to reading the book. Do you have any idea why the Kindle version isn't available in Canada? Hopefully it's just a timing issue and it will be available shortly.

  • Joe

    8/31/2011 4:23:34 PM |

    To Michael Gorancy:

    No, Michael, my attitude is extremely positive. But I'm also a realist. I just don't have a desire to undergo open-heart surgery, and I never expected to live forever anyway. I'm already past my anticipated expiration date.

    I'm sorry to hear about your problems; yes, they seem self-inflicted.  Most of our health problems are. I smoked for about 15 years, early in life, and thankfully quit about 38 years ago. And that you continue to smoke in your condition, well, that seems pretty negative to me. I'm fighting back; you seem to be giving up. But it's definitely your decision to do so, as it is mine.

    Another "20-30" years? I don't think so. That would mean I'd be 88-98 years old at death.  Are you serious? As stated before, I have Alzheimer's in my family, and there may not be a worse disease than that. Dropping dead from a sudden heart attack or heart failure (say, while out jogging) versus perhaps decades of not even knowing who I am, needing to be confined for my own safety, and a burden to others? That's a no-brainer for me, Michael.

    Your points:
    1. I've already decided not to have open-heart surgery.
    2. Yes, I wish I could find such patients.  But as Dr. Davis has said, it's apparently a rare condition. I can't find anything in the literature or on the Internet that's been any real help in that area.
    3. Again, I don't have a feeling of doom. Quite the contrary, in fact. Someone once said that "life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a ride!"  I want to be able to "skid in broadside" when I go, not be forced to lie in a bed in my own feces.

    I wish you the best of luck, Michael! But I sure wish you'd stop smoking!

    Joe

  • Paul

    8/31/2011 6:34:41 PM |

    I suggested to my mother-in-law that she eliminated sugar and flour from her diet.  She is overweight, and has hypertension, IBS, depression, hypothyroidism and fatigue (and, I believe, undiagnosed low cortisol based on an at-home salivary test)- she is a delight for the drug firms.  Without any exercise, she has now lost 23 pounds in about 4 months.  She is a lot better mentally and has more energy.  We will have to wait and see with her other problems pan out.

    I have ordered the book from Amazon and looking forward to its arrival. It is hard to argue against bread with its biblical endorsement - your book changes this.

  • Big Wave Dave

    8/31/2011 6:38:22 PM |

    Was 30 pounds overweight and suffered frequent heartburn.  I ate a lot of bread and pasta as I though it was healthy.  WRONG!  After reading Dr. Davis' "Have some more" I gave up wheat entirely and lost 20 pounds of fat in four months (muscle strength has remained constant.)  I eat as Dr. Davis recommends and am never hungry.  Friends have commented that I look quite robust (I am 58.)  No more heartburn to boot!  I am spreading the word about this great site to whoever will listen.  Thank you very much!

  • Jesper

    8/31/2011 6:56:07 PM |

    Hello and gratz on the book.

    I heard your interview on Robb Wolf's podcast. A fantastic show i must say and extremely interesting with all these stories of what wheat can do.

    My son who is 1½ years old has been suffering from som nasty wounds in his head for the last 6 months.
    The doctors have given the diagnosis Ofujis disease. Do you have any knowledge if this disease could be caused by wheat?
    I can find nothing on the disease besides it's rare and there seem to be no cure.

    Keep up the good work,

    best regards
    Your knew danish fanSmile

  • Vin Kutty

    8/31/2011 7:44:55 PM |

    Got the book yesterday from Amazon and already a few chapters into it. Congrats, Dr. Davis!

    Left it on the dining table for friends and family to read. People have read parts of it (my plan is working!) and the verdict: it's scary. They should be scared.

    Dr. Davis any comments on the CNN show last weekend with Dr. Gupta called 'Last Heart Attack'? There was an awful lot of disturbing talk about eating healthy whole grains and avoiding meats and oils. At least they talked a lot about calcium scans and interviewed Dr. Agatston. Wish they'd interviewed you instead of Ornish. Too bad.

  • Linda

    9/1/2011 1:53:13 AM |

    I would also enjoy reading your opinion regarding "The Last Heart Attack". It has been discussed on other blogs as well. Many of us feel that our former president looks awful. Not at all healthy or robust. He's been taking the advice of Ornish for quite awhile and has had heart problems at the same time. Perhaps he needs a new physician!

  • Tom

    9/1/2011 2:08:30 AM |

    I got my copy in the mail and read the first section before looking at the rest of the mail.  Following your advice from just this blog I've lost 70 lbs, raised my hdl and got my triglycerides to 80 and lowered my total cholesterol. I don't think any words are enough to say how thankful I am for your advice.  You're not only helping people lose weight and feel better, you're extending their lives.

    I've been waiting for a post to comment on and this seemed like a good one...

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    9/1/2011 6:15:48 AM |

    Hi Michael G.,
    Smoking generates myelo-peroxidase enzymes that oxidize the Apo A1 lipo-protein and then the ApoA1 component of HDL doesn't function well ... maybe you know this already.

  • nina

    9/1/2011 11:54:11 AM |

    Good work.

    The book is turning up all over the place.

    http://suzanneloomscreativity.blogspot.com/2011/09/roaming-ancestors-standing-still.html

    Nina

  • Soul

    9/1/2011 12:32:17 PM |

    Congrats Dr. Davis on the new book!  Look forward to learning more about the problems wheat can cause the body.

  • Joe Lindley

    9/1/2011 3:36:57 PM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I just posted a review of Wheat Belly on my blog ( see below).  I think the release of Wheat Belly will be a watershed event.  With the increased focus that has occurred recently on low carb diets and now this, the indictment of wheat as the primary culprit, I think many Americans will finally see a way out of this health nightmare.

    http://cravingsugar.net/wheat-belly-book-review-william-davis-gluten-intolerance-diet.php

    As I read your book I kept on running across the thoughts that "that happened to me" or "so that's what happened to one of my friends".  I think many will get the same reactions.

    Congratulations on publishing such an important book!
    ...Joe...

  • ChrisB

    9/1/2011 8:32:16 PM |

    +1.  As someone thats new to the paleo/primal diet and a young heart attack survivor I'm very concerned and confused after watching this.

  • ChrisB

    9/1/2011 8:33:11 PM |

    This was meant to be in response to "The Last Heart Attack" comment above.

  • Peter Silverman

    9/2/2011 1:54:19 AM |

    RE: The Last Heart Attack, my suspicion is that any diet that gets people off of factory produced food is a giant step in the right direction, whether it's Dr. Davis's, or Ornish's, or Esselstyn's or Agaston's.  These doctors all blame different foods, but they all advocate eating natural foods and staying away from processed ones.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:21:25 AM |

    Wow, Joe! You wrote a basic primer on the Wheat Belly project!

    Very nice. And thanks!

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:22:25 AM |

    Thanks, soul! Stay tuned. On both The Heart Scan Blog and the Wheat Belly Blog, I will continue to chronicle the growing wheat-free experience, as well as better ways to enjoy diet while remaining 100% wheat-free!

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:23:40 AM |

    Hi, Nina--

    That's great . . . provided I don't receive any unmarked packages with a ticking sound!

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:25:34 AM |

    Thank you, Tom, for sharing your experience. Simply telling your story will catch the attention of a few more people, who will then return and post their experiences, which will then . . . and that's how you and I build this grassroots effort to buck the nonsensical "cut the fat and eat more healthy whole grains" nonsense that passes for dietary advice today.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:31:12 AM |

    Hi, Vin--Thank you!

    What I told Linda a few comments above applies here as well. The world has been misled by the faulty logic: If something bad (white processed flour) is replaced by something less bad (whole grains), then more of the less bad thing is great. This is faulty, and potentially fatal, logic, but the basis for the entire nationwide advice to "cut your fat and eat more healthy whole grains." Gupta fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:35:15 AM |

    Hi, Linda--

    I admire Gupta's intentions. But he fell for the same nonsense that passes for conventional advice in health and heart disease prevention.

    In particular, the world has been misled by the faulty logic: If something bad (white processed flour) is replaced by something less bad (whole grains), then more of the less bad thing is great. This is faulty, and potentially fatal, logic, but the basis for the entire nationwide advice to "cut your fat and eat more healthy whole grains."

    I obviously don't have access to Mr. Clinton's health records, but he has every sign of being a small LDL particle kind of guy. He might also have Lp(a). I'd be surprised if either of these have been identified.

    Interestingly, while I admire much of Arthur Agatston's work, he has stated publicly that coronary calcium cannot be reduced. Anyone following these discussions knows that this is not true: coronary calcium can be reduced, even to extreme degrees. But the solution does not involve cutting fat, whole grains, and does not necessarily involve statin drugs.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:38:41 AM |

    Thank you, Jesper. Sorry, I know of no association of wheat consumption and your son's condition. However, I have to say that the reach of wheat into multiple health conditions even continues to surprise me.

    I wish the best for your son.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:41:11 AM |

    Thanks, Dave! And thank you for coming back to share your experience.

    It's stories like yours that build the experience. Please continue to come back and report your progress!

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:43:24 AM |

    Hi, Paul--

    Congratulations to your mother-in-law!

    In Wheat Belly, you will learn that the wheat of the Bible is different from the stuff being passed off to us today--it's completely different.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:54:08 AM |

    Hi, Mike--

    Sorry, no idea. I can't imagine that will continue.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:58:05 AM |

    Did you notice Bill Clinton's odd red face? While it could be that he simply drinks too much, I've seen this rash in many, many people who have odd responses to wheat; accordingly, the rash goes away with wheat elimination. Interesting. I suspect Clinton has a wheat addiction, since programs like that advocated by Ornish cultivate this sort of thing.

  • Dave Dixon

    9/2/2011 2:28:10 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis. I'm reading "Wheat Belly", and one thing that really jumped out at me were the studies about reduction of intake of wheat-based foods from naloxone administration. Did these studies have any control to measure the amount of appetite reduction for non-wheat foods? Thanks.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:45:50 PM |

    Hi, Dave--
    The researchers didn't look specifically at wheat foods, but made statements like "the reduction in unhealthy fatty and sugar foods like cakes, cupcakes, and pie were reduced." So there was a bit of extrapolation on my part, but the final message, I thought, was pretty clear even though the investigators with their pre-existing dietary biases did not see it.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:49:10 PM |

    Yes, Peter. I agree.

    An argument could be made for this approach in some genetic types, e.g., apo E4. Note also that neither of these docs are cardiologists and have probably treated as many heart attacks or dealt with real heart disease as the kid working at Home Depot.

    We should learn from them what lessons might be useful for people outside of the exceptional apo E4. It was the Ornish diet that, 20 years ago, made me gain 30 lbs, pushed my HDL to 27 mg/dl, increased my triglycerides to 350 mg/dl, and made me diabetic. Going off their diet and eliminating all wheat and sugars corrected everything, including no more diabetes. Having seen a similar scenario play out many, many times, these guys are, in my view, flogging a dead horse. The horse ran a good race while it was alive, but now it's dead.

  • ChrisB

    9/2/2011 3:01:19 PM |

    Dr Davis, you seem to have nailed it in my opinion.  Still trying to get my wife on board.  It was that (Ornish) diet that gave me a heart attack two years ago (34 yo and 155 lbs).  HDL was 16!  TC 115!  I just very recently found the whole Paleo, or eat fats, not grains, diet and I really hope this works for me.  I am very very confident it will.

  • Dave Dixon

    9/2/2011 4:49:18 PM |

    Right. And presumably they were looking at binge eaters, and I suspect most people don't have a problem binging on foods which don't contain wheat and/or refined sugar.

  • Mike Larocque

    9/2/2011 5:12:25 PM |

    Just as an FYI, from my Canadian IP, going to the Kindle version of the page ( http://www.amazon.com/Wheat-Belly-Weight-Health-ebook/dp/B00571F26Y ), it says "This title is _not available_ for customers from Canada". The 'not available' links to the following explanation: "Due to copyright restrictions, certain Kindle Titles are not available everywhere...". So it appears to be something to do with the publisher.

  • Thomas Geisner

    9/8/2011 8:01:36 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    I heard your interview on Robb Wolf's podcast and I'm eager to read your book after your very convincing appearance! As a Cardiothoracic Surgeon (in Norway), I've put my head on the block by both publicly and on my blog recommending people to take grains out of the diet. Imagine my disappointment when I found that I can't buy the e-book because I'm situated in Norway! Is there any way I can get around "the ban of Europe"?

    Best regards,

    tg

  • Tom Nikkola

    9/9/2011 1:28:59 AM |

    I'm looking forward to reading the new book. I'm going to download it to Kindle as soon as I finish The Art and Science of Low-Carb Living. Based on what I've read on you blog in the past, I'm sure I will be recommending it to our RDs and Personal Trainers at Life Time Fitness.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/9/2011 2:26:55 AM |

    Dr. Geisner--

    I saw your question over on the Wheat Belly Blog. I will need to check into what is going on.

    Thanks for asking!

  • varicose veins detroit michigan

    9/13/2011 6:02:55 PM |

    Looks like a great book. It's startling to know--for a beginner like me how twisted the food production process has become from the books and documentaries i've seen since i've converted to eating healthy.

  • Anon

    9/20/2011 12:56:33 AM |

    Perhaps William Davis is correct in the claims he makes in Wheat Belly. And perhaps not. Time will tell. Many have made nutritional proclamations about a number of things, including the “fact” that eggs should be avoided, or that red meat can and will certainly cause heart disease, or that we must stay away from anything white, including flour, milk, and yogurt. And now the claim is that wheat is an opiate that must be eschewed at all costs.
    Has wheat been genetically engineered—with deleterious effects—for mass production? Probably. But what hasn’t been? Davis recommends eating salmon…is that wild caught or farm raised? Even if advertised as wild caught, how do we know this? There has been some unresolved controversy over mislabeling, and serious concerns over mercury and PCB content in some salmon. Eggs are recommended by Davis— “not in the once a week” style as we’ve been taught—but as often as one’s body tells one to eat them. But what kind of chickens produce these eggs and what are they eating? How do we know? The same holds true for the other recommended items on the Davis diet. Even if all of the “cage-free, grass-fed, wild-caught, organic, super organic, sustainable, pesticide-free” goods were accessible and affordable to the average American (a separate topic, of course), there are all sorts of issues about authenticity—some of which probably won’t surface for years. It’s not necessarily possible for us to each have a plot of land with our own chickens, cows, pigs, vegetable gardens, and spring water.
    Among other issues, there are two things that are especially troubling about Davis’s work. One is the polemical tone that allows for nothing less than everyone going off of every form of wheat--and not having wheat in any quantity ever again (unless one wants to face uncomfortable and even dire side effects). Regardless of family history, exercise, indigenous foods, cultural background, etc., the message is the same for everyone. The second troubling feature is that those who write positive reviews on Davis’s blogs are often commended by him, while those who write in to say that perhaps his stance is a little extreme are not even addressed (and perhaps not included?). “Pascal” from Davis’s blog on oatmeal, for example, writes in to say that his glucose level after eating a regular serving of oatmeal is nowhere near what Davis prophesied that it would be—and says that his is not an isolated case. There was no response to this.
    Walter Willett, MD, and Chair of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard Public Health Department, argues that it’s not at the starting line that we determine whether or not a particular diet is effective. It is not over the course of three or six months, or even a year or two. All the “before” and “after” pictures in the world don’t really matter if five or ten years down the line, the individuals in question have gone back to their “before” weight and numbers—or worse. What counts is that which can be sustained over a lifetime…and this takes time and resources to chart and scientifically assess. (As a sidebar, Willett promotes certain types and quantities of whole grains, in conjunction with a number of other food types, as well as exercise).
    Time will tell whether or not Davis’s work is the best thing since sliced bread—or not.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/20/2011 12:35:08 PM |

    If you're going to go on like that, I think it would be best to leave a name or identifier. Nothing like throwing rocks and then running.

    One issue: There is absolutely no question that wheat has changed genetically. Ask any agricultural geneticist. This is not concealed; in fact, it is openly talked about, even proudly. The incredible thing is that it is not seen as the cause of multiple health problems.

    And I have to pick my battles. Some are simply not worth fighting.

  • Anon

    9/20/2011 4:13:07 PM |

    Please forgive me if my response seemed too strong. As I say, you may be right about everything in your book; you certainly make some fine points and have given people good things to think about. My point was simply that some claims in Wheat Belly may need to be mitigated or adjusted over time—and that there are medical professionals, researchers, and scientists with varying opinions on the topics you present.  Hopefully that is a good thing in that it encourages further thought and study in an ever-changing field. Your diet may work perfectly for some people, and that is great. For others, perhaps your recommendations work in modified form. And for yet others, maybe another nutritional plan works best. Hopefully that’s okay. Thank you for taking the time to respond, and for helping people to consider such an important topic. And thank you for helping me to think carefully about some new ideas.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/20/2011 11:11:36 PM |

    Ah, THAT anon.

    Please keep in mind that it is a book. It is not a round table discussion.

    From where I view the world, wheat looks to me like the biggest nutritional blunder ever committed on a large scale. Removal of it yields some of the most incredible weight and health turnarounds I have ever seen. It doesn't have to work for everybody and it's okay with me if this makes some people angry. My concern is that people need to hear the side of the argument that few are talking about . . . while being inundated with proclamation of the benefits of "healthy whole grains."

  • Alejandro

    9/23/2011 11:25:09 AM |

    I just bought your book today.  I'm only about a quarter-way through it, and it's excellent so far.  Intriguing, and very well written.  

    I'm full blooded Mexican born and raised in the US on a pretty typical American diet.  Rice and beans were staples in my house, but we favored bread and flour tortillas over corn tortillas like good Americans.  Everyone in my family has struggled to varying degrees with weight.  I'm by far the thinnest because I've worked very hard to stay fit and trim.  I work out about 4-5 times a week, lifting and doing cardio.  I can't eat like most other guys who seem to be able to consume 50% more than I do, workout less, and look just as good or even better.  When I was younger I thought maybe Mexicans were just prone to more pudge around the middle.  Even at my thinnest, fittest, and buffest I still maintain some semblance of a belly.  It's frustrating.

    When I was 15 I traveled to Mexico for the first time to visit extended family.  I wasn't in as good of shape then as I am now (at 35), and had more belly fat.  A very curious thing happened on that trip:  In spite of eating copious amounts of my grandmother's delicious food for a solid month - 3 hearty meals a day including "cena", the last Mexican meal of the day which happens right before bed - I shed pounds.  To my American friends this seemed implausible.  "But Mexican food is soooo fattening!"  "Eating right before bed?  That's the worst!"  "All that cheese?"  etc.  Still I lost weight without any physical effort, and while eating way more than I did as a self-conscious teenager back in the States.  

    I've since traveled to Mexico more times than I can count, and every single time without fail, I eat more and lose weight, noting the difference especially in my belly.  Chilaquiles (fried strips of corn tortilla with cheese), chiles rellenos (stuffed peppers with cheese), tamales made with lard (yes, lard), etc.  Doesn't matter.  Pounds come off without additional exercise, indeed without the exercise I'm used to in the States.  It dawned on me one day that maybe there's something about the American diet and our processed food that makes it so challenging for me to stave off gut flab.

    I just spent a month there this summer, and this time I did do a little exercise (push ups and sit ups in my hotel 3 times a week and running on the beach just a few times - far less than I do at home), but I certainly didn't skimp on food.  By the end of my trip, my stomach was the flattest it's ever been in my life, finally exposing those two elusive cans on my lower abdomen to reveal my six pack.

    A couple of weeks after my return to the States, I was back to my four pack in spite of eating much less and ostensibly healthier food, and working my ass off at the gym.

    All this to say, maybe it's the wheat.  (You nod.)  When I'm in Mexico my main source of carbs is corn not wheat.  Could it be that that simple switch is why my belly flattens out when I'm in my ancestral homeland?  I'm going to put it to the test, and will let you know how it goes.  Smile

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/25/2011 12:15:48 AM |

    Hi, Alejandro--

    Wonderful observations! You seem to have a gift for connecting cause-effect relationship.

    While corn is, by no means, without its own set of concerns, given a choice of corn vs. wheat, I'd pick the corn. Perhaps that's at least part of the reason you experience the weight loss with each trip.

Loading
“Too many false positives”

“Too many false positives”

“Do you really think I need a heart scan?” asked Terry.

“My doctor said that heart scans show too many false positives. He says that many people end up getting unnecessary heart catheterizations because of them.”

At age 56, Terry was becoming increasingly frightened. His father had suffered his first heart attack at age 53, Terry’s paternal uncle had a heart attack at age 56, his paternal grandfather a heart attack at age 50.

Is this true? Do heart scans yield too many false positives, meaning abnormal results when there really is no abnormality?

No, it is not. What Terry’s doctor is referring to is the fact that, in the decades-long process that leads to heart attack, heart scans have the ability to detect early phases of developing coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

Let’s take Terry’s case, for example. Given his family history, it is quite likely that he does indeed have coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Will it be detectable by performing a stress test? Probably not. In fact, Terry jogs and feels well while doing so. While a stress test abnormality that fails to reach conscious perception is possible, it’s fairly unlikely given his exercise routine.

Will Terry’s coronary atherosclerotic plaque be detectable by heart catheterization? Very likely. But why perform an invasive hospital procedure just as a screening test? Should a woman wishing to undergo a screening test for breast cancer undergo breast removal? Of course not.

Is waiting for symptoms a rational way to approach diagnosis of heart disease? Well, when symptoms appear, it means that coronary blood flow is reduced. Stents and bypass surgery may be indicated. The risk of heart attack and death skyrocket. Sudden death becomes a real possibility.

In the 30 or so years required to establish sufficient coronary plaque to permit the appearance of symptoms or the development of an abnormality detectable by stress testing, there were many years when the disease was early--too early to generate symptoms, too early to be detectable by stress testing.

That’s when heart scans uncover evidence for silent coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

Should we call this a “false positive” just because it doesn’t also correlate with “need” for a catheterization, stent, bypass operation or result in heart attack within the next few weeks?

The detection of early plaque is just that: early disease detection.

Imagine, for instance, that the breast cancer that will grow into a palpable nodule or mass detectable by mammogram is detectable by a special breast scan 15 years before it becomes a full-blown tumor, metastasizing to other organs. What if effective means to halt that earliest evidence of cancer could put a stop to this devastating disease decades ahead of danger? Is this a “false positive” too?

In my view, this is the knuckleheaded thinking of the conventional practitioner: “Don’t bother me until you’re really sick.” Prevention is a practice that has become fashionable only because of the push of the drug industry. Nutrition is an afterthought, a message conceived through consensus of “experts” with suspect motivations and allegiances.

So, no, heart scans do not uncover “false positives.” They uncover early disease--true positives--years before it is detectable by standard tests or by the appearance of catastrophe. But that is the whole point: Early detection means getting a head start on prevention.

Do heart scans lead to unnecessary heart catheterizations? Yes, sadly they do. But not because heart scans are false positive. It happens because of unscrupulous or ignorant cardiologists who use the information wrongly. In my view, heart scans should NEVER lead directly to heart catheterization in an asymptomatic patient. Heart scans, as helpful as they are, do not modify the standard reasons for performing heart procedures.

If a car mechanic is dishonest and fixes a carburetor that didn't need fixing, should we condemn all car mechanics? No, of course not. We only need to develop the means to weed out the bad apples. The same applies to heart scans.

Comments (6) -

  • steve

    9/4/2008 2:43:00 PM |

    why even bother with expense of a heart scan and radiation exposure when detailed Lipoprotein analysis may be all you need?  If you have many small LDL particles isn't that enough to say you probably have CAD and should address it; while if your LDL particles are mostly large your probably ok

  • Anonymous

    9/4/2008 5:41:00 PM |

    Small LDLs alone may or may not mean one has plaque. Likewise, someone that doesn't have too many small LDLs might have plaque.

    Plus, like Dr. Davis likes to point out, the most important heart scan is not the 1st heart scan but the 2nd heart scan. You see, if someone has any plaque (above zero), then after they take the necessary steps to try and slow down, stop and even reverse the plaque they have NO WAY to know if the steps they took are enough whithout the results from the 2nd scan (which is usually taken 1 year after the lipoproteins have been corrected).

    The amount of radiation is about the same as several chest x-rays:

    http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/ct-scans-and-radiation-exposure.html

  • MedPathGroup

    9/5/2008 7:48:00 AM |

    Hi there. I am just dropping by. I came across this blog when i was researching about coronary bypass surgery. Very informative stuffs I can add in to my research. Thanks for sharing this information. I will keep on visiting this blog for more interesting posts.

  • joel oosterlinck M.D.

    9/5/2008 8:30:00 AM |

    firs of all this blog is really interesting I am a french family practitioner with specialisation in hyperbaric and gynoaecology.
    My question is heartscan is not a mainstream test in my area  where 64 slices scan machines arrived 2 years ago some of my cardiologists advised for 64 slice angiogram for screening . I read in european literature that there is an unresolved problem with  false negatives  in heart scan can you please elaborate with this false negative issue ?

  • Tony Romeyn

    12/2/2008 5:08:00 AM |

    My story, sorry it is a bit long.
    For many years I have been dealing with medium to high cholesterol levels. High cholesterol is only one part to the danger of plaque buildup in the arteries and an eventual possible heart attack. Other risk factors such as, Smoking, Hypertension, Diabetes, Obesity, Inactivity, Stress and Family history all play a role in High Cholesterol.

    It was approximately 10-15 years ago that my Doctor suggested that I go on medication with one of the Statin drugs and Lipitor is what he suggested for me. With a great amount of reluctance I finally agreed, but I certainly was not happy with the potential side effects, as there are many. The worst side effect that could happen was a muscle tissue breakdown with severe muscle pain. Well low and behold within 10 days I have severe muscle tissue pain and took my Lipitor pills and dumped them down the toilet. When I told my Doctor what I had done he was not too happy but he could identify with what was happening.

    It was at that point that I started to ask that although my blood test showed that I had high cholesterol, did that necessarily indicate that I had clogged arteries. I continued to ask the same question over many years. My family Doctor continued to advise me that he would like to try another statin med called Zocor. Again I reluctantly agreed and started to research how others did with Zocor on the Internet. Again many reported of similar side effects as I experienced with Lipitor.

    That year during vacation time I picked up a newspaper……..I am a news junky……. and there was an article that hit me like a ton of bricks; Bacol by Bayer was being recalled due to a number of reported deaths and other severe side effects. At that point I took my Zocor meds and dumped them down the toilet also………….oops I probably polluted the drainage water………. determined never to do a Statin drug again.

    Years went by and tests were done from time to time, sometime showing medium to higher levels.

    Then came late February of this year 2008. Within three days of having a few dizzy spells I collapsed and had emergency surgery due to an ulcer which had perforated an artery. That is a whole story in itself, but just one note if you are taking a good number of Aspirin and Ibuprofen, you may, no you must check with your Doctor to see what is happening with your stomach.

    In that short period of time just before my surgery I had lost about 6 units of blood. During my healing process I was told I was lucky to be alive. A few weeks into the recuperation time I can to reflect on the fact that my heart must have to have been awfully strong to have dealt with significant blood loss. Then I began to re ask the same question, hey my arteries could not be blocked, otherwise my heart would never have kept up. I posed this question to my surgeon, and he confirmed that that is not necessarily true.

    Now we come to the time of a recent cholesterol test which showed numbers higher than ever before. The same answer you need to go on Cholesterol lowering drugs. I came to the point and said to my Doctor I want to get a test to see if my arteries have buildup and how do we do this. Without significant physical symptoms our medial system does not allow for such a test, which is either an Angiogram or a CT Scan.

    In recent years a new 64-Slice CT scanner became available, a non-invasive evaluation of arteries. But our medical system still does not allow  a scan to be done without significant physical symptoms.
    Now here comes into play the private diagnostic clinics. In consultation with my Doctor I looked into and booked to get a Heart Scan (Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring) done at the Canada Diagnostic Clinic in Vancouver. An appointment was available almost immediately and of course I would have to pay for this myself at a cost of $690.00, plus travel to Vancouver and an overnight stay. Quite costly and not affordable to everyone. (Please scroll down for details of the scan)
    NOW THE GOOD NEWS! My heart arteries only showed a very minor calcium build up at two points. My Calcium score was 19.

    NO NEED TO GO ON RISKY STATIN DRUGS, SUCH AS Lipitor, Zocor, Baycol or a more recent addition Crestor (here is what is mentioned on the Johns Hopkins Hospital website - "although the potency of Crestor appears to be fully established, its safety is not. Unless there is an overwhelming reason to take a very new drug, the best approach is to wait for some time to pass to allow unforeseen problems, if any, to be detected." WITH POSSIBILTY OF SIGNIFICANT SIDE EFFECTS

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 2:24:56 PM |

    In my view, this is the knuckleheaded thinking of the conventional practitioner: “Don’t bother me until you’re really sick.” Prevention is a practice that has become fashionable only because of the push of the drug industry. Nutrition is an afterthought, a message conceived through consensus of “experts” with suspect motivations and allegiances.

Loading
Sit Less and Move More.

Sit Less and Move More.



We sit way too much. Many of us have desk jobs where we sit for 8 to 9 hours a day. After we leave the office, we sit in our car to run errands. We follow that by sitting down to eat dinner. Our day ends by sitting on the couch to unwind by watching some television.

Many of us will be sitting a good 12 to 15 hours each and every day. Unfortunately the research shows that long hours of sitting can lead to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and even early death. Don’t be fooled that your workout is enough movement. You can still be active and sedentary.

How can you add more movement to your day? First, think about all the times you find yourself sitting during the day. Then come up with a creative way that you can get out of the seat and move your feet.

Here are a couple of examples:

Instead of driving everywhere, jump on your bike. The picture above is of the bike I use to go to work or run errands. Bike riding is great exercise, greener transportation and a great stress relief.

We spend a lot of time at work sitting in front of the computer or the phone. Prop your laptop on a bookshelf to create a standing workstation. You can also purchase a sit-stand workstation you can adjust throughout the day. Get a headset and stand during phone calls.

Walk during your lunch break. Walk to the coffee shop, the mailbox, and the dry cleaners. Get your errands done on foot or just enjoy a stroll outside.

Take a movement break every hour. Do some desk push-ups, squats or walk the stairs. Need to communicate with a coworker? Don't email, walk over and talk to them.

Human beings are meant to move, not sit in chairs all day. I want to challenge you to incorporate more movement into your day. I'd love to read your comments how you move more and sit less.

Loading
The IF Life: Intermittent fasting

The IF Life: Intermittent fasting

There's a wonderful blog called The IF Life: Intermittent Fasting and Instant Freedom. It is written by personal trainer (and apparently former corporate bigshot), Mike O'Donnell.

Mike has a great take on brief, intermittent fasting that I found helpful and I believe you will also.






Intermitent Fasting 101: How to Start, Part I

The biggest question people have is how to effectively use IF (intermittent fasting) to achieve their goals and maximum results. These results and goals can vary by each person with fat loss, muscle gain, better health, improved performance in your sport of choice and more. With that comes the individuality of what is a person’s insulin resistance, current body composition (bodyfat%), daily lifestyle, eating habits, macronutrient ratios (carbs/protein/fat), type of exercise program, frequency and volume of training, recovery demands, and so forth. You are unlikely to find 2 people with the same set of parameters and same exact responses to an IF protocol. What does this mean? Well just that we need to start with a basic IF program, and then learn how to monitor results and adjust as we go. Even down the road things will change as you will improve health, lower insulin resistance and maybe change performance and recovery needs. So nothing is ever just one set way. Life is dynamic (always changing and evolving) and so should be the way we see our own journey for health and fitness.

What is IF?

For those that may not be familiar to the term, intermittent fasting is just taking times of fast (no food) and working them into your lifestyle. This can be either daily or a couple times a week (will get into that more below). Benefits include improving insulin resistance (which you will hear alot about as being the #1 key marker in so many health factors including weight loss, muscle gain, performance, recovery, anti-ageing and disease prevention) and giving the body a chance to do some internal cleaning (or housework), which can lead to improved immune function and overall health. If you want to see studies of all the benefits of IF/CR, please the resources page.


How do I begin to IF?

Is there only one set way in which to do IF? No. I could easily come up with 10 different IF protocols based on 10 people’s individual’s needs, lifestyle, exercise, goal, macronutrient ratios, and so forth. We will keep it simple and give the 2 most frequent and basic options.

Daily Fasting: Typically done every day and only giving the person a smaller eating window in which to get their calories. (for example, a 18hr daily fast would mean someone would only eat every day between the hours of Noon and 6pm). You will see varying times from 15-19 hours for daily fasting.
Fasting 1-3x a week: This could also be called alternate day fasting/calorie restriction (for those doing it every other day). This is just fasting of usually longer periods 18-24 hours but only 1-3x a week. Many variations to play with here.
“But which one is better and how to I do it now if I want…….”. Whoa, slow down. I know many have questions but let’s still try to keep this simple for now and expand into more specifics later. So far many people have experimented with both types of IF and have seen great results. But you also have to take into account all the other variables such as what is the person eating in that window? Is is junk food? Is it low carb? How many times a week are they doing it? Are they overweight and wanting just fat loss? Are they lower bodyfat but looking for improved performance and health? How many times a week are they exercising? What kind are they doing and what intensity? The list can go on and on, but let’s start to analyze the 2 types of IF and let you decide which one best suits your lifestyle.

Daily Fasting (15-19 hours):

The Advantages are:

--simple eating strategies for every day
--even people that may not eat 100% clean foods can see weight loss due to the smaller window and lower calorie total per day


The Disadvantages are:

--Can possibly lower metabolism if calories are too low for too long (not what you want if your #1 goal is weight loss)
--Not getting enough food in the smaller window may also lead to muscle loss for more active people (not good)
Fasting 1-3x a week:


The advantages are:

--Allows a person to make sure they are getting enough calories on the non-fasting days, and then just keeps to a simple small feed window (if any) on the IF days.
--Simple thinking for people who do not have experience in how to eat clean to eat one day, and then eat in a smaller window the following day (alternate day fasting/CR). This can achieve fat loss for people who are mostly overweight and may not be too active. (of course don’t get me wrong, that eating healthy is our main goal but this can be a good step for some people to start their weight loss jounrey and learn how to make better choices as they go)


Disadvantages:

--Doesn’t force a person to make better choices with their food (as one could probably eat junk one day, and then fast the next and still lose weight). Not something we want long term because this is not going to improve your other health markers (diseases prevention, insulin resistance) like a good IF program on healthy foods.


Again I can’t say it enough, as there are so many variables to play with in an IF program. Some people may say “well it didn’t work for me” or “I didn’t gain any muscle”. Well unless I know everything about what you do for exercise daily, your total calories, when you eat and your macronutrient ratios (protein/carbs/fats), I can’t even begin to help. IF is a simple tool to start with, but you have to take full responsibility for your own health and progress and learn when it is not working and when to change things up! Like I said, if it is NOT working then stop IF and rethink your attack plan (or get a professional to coach you on it).

So to sum up, here are some examples of what you can play with:

Daily Fasting of 15-19 hours. I would highly suggest that if you do this make sure you are recovering from your exercise and start only Mon-Fri and give yourself the weekends to eat all day (hopefully with healthy choices of course)


Fast 1-2x a week to start if you have never done any fasting or do not know how to eat healthy and control your macronutrients. Start with 1-2 days a week with fasts of 18-20 hours (I wouldn’t start with 24 hr fasts to begin as most people can not handle the hunger cravings and in turn will just end up eating all the wrong foods when they do eat) and say eat only from say 1pm-6pm for example. Drink lots of water (add lemon, your liver will appreciate it! and it will help with the hunger). For example, fast Wed and Sun (or whatever days fit into your schedule)

Or you can do a mixed approach and fast every other day for a small eating window. For example eat all day Mon, only 12-6pm on Tues, all day Wed, 12-6pm on Thurs, etc. Start with bigger eating windows and make them smaller as you get used to fasting. This approach may work for people who have alot of weight to lose and can not (I should really say “will not” as everything is a choice!) eat 100% healthy for the moment. This approach may not work for more advanced people who have a high activity level unless you are getting a ton of health calories in that fasting window.
“So What Do I Eat on the Fasting Days?”

That’s the best part, you should be able to eat unlimited healthy foods (healthy proteins, fats, veggies, fruit, nuts…see Paleo Diet in the resources page). If you are eating more processed foods, breads and other high calorie intakes then you may have to monitor and control portions. Please know this is NOT about chronic calorie restriction or starving yourself. When I do weeks of eating 1-7pm, I am eating a ton of protein and veggies (complex carbs pwo also). I am hardly starving myself. I am not taking in 4000 cal a day however, so my daily average of say 2200-2500 cal is still low compared to the alternative. If you want to lose weight of course you will need a calorie deficit to pull the “stored energy” out of fat cells. That is the advantage to eating “Paleo”, you can’t over eat on protein, healthy fats, fruits (in moderation) and veggies. If you are making bad choices or starving yourself on IF, you may lose the effectiveness or slow progress. All goes back to the fact that if it is not working, then change something up! (there is always something that can be changed…and food choices is the #1 place to start!) I don’t count calories, and by eating natural foods that have been around for 100s of years….I don’t need to! (eating healthy natural foods will not only help you lose weight but also improve your health and lower your risks of diseases….so eating for health should always be the #1 goal in any program)

Hopefully this will give a good overview while trying to keep it simple. Remember it’s your journey to take, measure progress and adjust things that are not working. Start with one approach, and modify it. Who knows, your approach may change every couple months and that is ok. Life is always changing and so should your approach to health and fitness (as the body always responds better to change than sticking with the same eating/exercise approach for a long period of time).

Comments (4) -

  • Anonymous

    4/21/2008 11:56:00 AM |

    The web sight looks interesting and worth a try.  

    With demand for cereal crops higher than current supplies in the world, many of us might be going on a fast in the future, whether we want to or not.

  • Anonymous

    4/22/2008 4:57:00 AM |

    In North Korea they have been recommending eating once a day since quite a long time. They even show on tv proofs how harmful overeating (i.e. eating 3 meals a day) can be.
    Up to now I didn't realize they just advocate IF Smile

  • jpatti

    4/28/2008 7:03:00 PM |

    One possible caveat I'd add... diabetics should approach IF cautiously.

    Many of us have Dawn Phenomenon, in which blood glucose begins to rise before we awaken in the morning.  For some of us, DP continues *until* we eat.  The liver keeps producing glucose until it sees some coming in.  

    My own liver is apparently... rather "hysterical" about preventing hypoglycemia and overreacts tremendously.  If I awaken with a fasting bg of 120-140 and don't eat, my blood glucose can rise to over 200 by mid afternoon!  I *have* to eat at least a small breakfast, half a protein shake at minimum, to prevent that from happening.  

    There are diabetics who use IF successfully, some post to Dr. Bernstein's forum if you want to read their experiences.  

    But it really is going to depend on your own DP and how it works and you need to TEST to see what it is doing.  If isn't appropriate for everyone.

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 12:30:17 PM |

    Fast 1-2x a week to start if you have never done any fasting or do not know how to eat healthy and control your macronutrients. Start with 1-2 days a week with fasts of 18-20 hours (I wouldn’t start with 24 hr fasts to begin as most people can not handle the hunger cravings and in turn will just end up eating all the wrong foods when they do eat) and say eat only from say 1pm-6pm for example. Drink lots of water (add lemon, your liver will appreciate it! and it will help with the hunger). For example, fast Wed and Sun (or whatever days fit into your schedule)

Loading