I'm finishing a jar of "dry" (not oil suspended) Vitamin D3 capsules and taking them with enteric coated fish oil. Might the enteric coating prevent the fish oil from helping the "dry" D3 absorption?

Really interesting post. I think I'm sensitive to wheat, but can't seem to stop eating it right now. Once I gave it up for about two months and lost 20 pounds. I should probably try to eliminate it again. Thanks for the insight.

Interesting.  I have just the opposite experience though.  My very rare (maybe once every 6 months or so) consumption of wheat causes no obvious symptoms whatsoever though I have in the past had severe sinus allergy response to wheat/gluten

When I first went gluten-free, I was not as careful as I am now and had several incidences of acute joint pain (with incredible heat) upon exposure to minute amounts of gluten.  The last time I knowingly ate gluten (crumbs from a crouton on a salad) I woke up the next day with the most intense back pain I have ever had.  My usual response to gluten is in the form of migraines. This pain was definitely not muscle pain but neurological with squeezing pains from my spine to the front.  That was the last time I had any gluten - I am extremely careful now and I have been GF 3 years and feel so much better.   I think gluten is a poison, plain and simple, and everyone would be better off not consuming it in any way.

I'm one of the lucky ones.  I caved during the silly season and stole a couple of my sisters' delicious homemade double chocolate cookies.  Alas, no mad dashes to the procelean apparatus.

Wheat breeding sounds to be at fault for the way it's protein folds into an antigen trigger for a lot of people. Granny gave me jam with bread, pie and sugar cookies which didn't provoke malaise, but that was older breed of wheat.  

Now-a-days professional diet advice is to avoid sugar, substitue sweetener. So, many don't get that sugar binding to  the gluten protein fragments. For people with metabolic syndrome adding back in sugar doesn't make sense; they can't use it to "goop-up" the gluten. Cutting out the wheat for them solves the dilema.

Gluten are metabolized into opioids. Both the digestive system and the immune system have lots of neurons AFAIK. Is a nice system to protect the brain, I would guess. Evolution and natures way to say: Don't eat that, it'll mess you up.

Why diarrhea with wheat rechallenge etc.?
Perhaps because your bacterial intestinal flora has changed since wheat/grain elimination.

I have suffered from gastroparesis for 20+ years. Some medication has helped, but nothing has worked better than a carb/wheat free diet. If I avoid them my digestion seems fine. One cookie and within a few hours the rumbling and belching begins . . .

There's this Ethiopian restaurant here in LA. They serve a flat bread called Injera.

I must have it once or twice a year, I tell you, I must! Even though it causes sores in my mouth by the next morning. It never did that when I was eating wheat regularly. Now that I've given up wheat, BAM! Sores!

Otherwise, I'm a sore-free, wheat-free good boy the rest of the year.

Dr. Davis,

Great post.  I believe I have experienced exactly what you described.  I gave up drinking beer (my only grain) last summer and recent grain encounters led to stomach pain and quick trips to the bathroom.  One time I felt really sick for hours.

There are never a shortage of reasons to avoid grains.

@ Anonymous,
I did some work in Ethiopia in 1970 & ate a lot of Injera;
fermented Teff grain with a soaking phase. This increases the % of Arginine amino acids in Injera. People with cold sores are often agravated by arginine foods. Your sensitive mouth tissue is probably reacting to the high level of arginine. (Your individual sensitivity would likely extend to Indian Idli, soaked/fermented rice with dhall bean puff; it's bio-converted a lot of arginine too.)

For those of us that are cutting way back on wheat in our diets, but not eliminating it - what are our best options?  I'm finding heirloom wheat flour available on the internet.  And here's an interesting article I found on Heirloom wheats:
'Are Heirloom Wheat Varieties the Next Big Baking Trend?"
http://www.seriouseats.com/2010/01/is-heirloom-wheat-the-next-big-baking-trend-jim-lahey.html

And what about Kamut?  Any comments?  Here's a write-up on it - it has some very nice features.
http://www.suite101.com/content/kamut-ancient-grain-in-modern-times-a89648

I try to avoid wheat all the time.

However, I found one bread here, that is made without Flour but uses wheat sprouts instead. The recipe is made by Russian academic scientist.
You have some English language info at

http://www.zernohleb.ru/health_eng.html

What do you think about it ?

Thx

My digestion was always lousy (but I didn't know it) until I cut out wheat.

Now if I reintroduce the reaction varies depending on the form of poison. Pasta is worst, sending the gi tract into the red zone for a week, plus migraines and sinus.

other forms (cookies, pizza) the reaction is less volcanic, but still noticeable. The baseline reaction is the sensation that the lining of my stomach has been scrubbed with a brillo pad, and sometimes joint and back pain, with a touch of sinus fun.

All this I used to think of as"normal".

Anyone have any success with enzyme products (like "Gluten Ease“) to help deal with occasional exposure?

"The majority of people who experience a wheat re-exposure syndrome will have diarrhea and cramps..."

This seems to say that of those who DO have symptoms ("experience a ... syndrome"), a majority will have diarrhea and cramps and a minority will have other symptoms.  But what proportion experience any symptoms?  Like Geoffrey above, I don't.

Wow... that just happened to me.  But only after being wheat free for like a week.  I was experimenting with a gluten free paleo diet but went out with some friends to the mall to see a movie.  I drank one beer ate 4 slices of pizza and a big cookie.  I ended up screaming at a friend over a stupid comment, nothing serious, but I felt SO angry .  Something that is not usual for me.  Then that night I woke up in the middle of the night with stomach pain and diarrhea.  
This was after just 1 week with no wheat.

I forgot to add that I had bad headaches just 30 minutes or so after eating the pizza slices too..

Don't you think this could also have something to do with the 1 in 133 statistic for celiac disease? Alot more are gluten intolerant and on down the spectrum to gluten sensitive.  

That adds up to a whole lot of people out there who are on the continuum of mere sensitivity --->celiac

That's me in a nutshell. Re-exposed to wheat and it was two days of unspeakable nastiness... I lapsed into this silliness as an experiment with the 4HB which necessitates a weekly wild day. It was wild alright...

Great post. I would love it if someone could explain the mechanism by which this re-exposure horror happens.

Since cutting out gluten, even tiny exposures have sent my stomach into paroxysms of pain. This is accompanied by nausea and an all over sick feeling, like I have been poisoned.

My bloods tested negative for coeliac though so I don't understand why I have such a bad reaction.

I am one of those people prone to headaches, migraine and colds. Usually, my first recourse is White Flower Embrocation (embrocation.50webs.com), also called White Flower Oil

Hi Dr. Davis.
I’m actually both pleased and troubled with the link to Dr. Diamond’s presentation that you’ve provided.

On the “pleased” side, Dr. Diamond’s analysis is:
•  An excellent/very well done presentation
•  Fact based (e.g. cites numerous studies, documented references, named experts, etc.)
•  Spans the test of time (e.g. references from the 1800’s thru the present day)
•  Ferrets out the major drivers of our present-day obesity epidemic & debunks other commonly held beliefs
•  Synchs with some of the Track Your Plaque (TYP) tenants (e.g. TYP guidance on triglycerides, diet, sugars, etc.)
•  â€œFlags” potential issues like conflict of interest which might have a tendency to creep into the science on occasion (e.g. the Keys report, the errant conclusions resulting from the NCEP report and supporting studies, etc.)

On the “troubled” side, Dr. Diamond’s analysis seems to:
•  Fly in the face of some of the foundational tenants of TYP
•  His analysis/conclusions, and that of other experts he cites, is that cholesterol of any kind is NOT correlated with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) – at least as a root cause of heart disease (see Myth #2 and Dr. Diamond’s related analysis)
•  That LDL cholesterol – and although not stated by Dr. Diamond I’m inferring – the “sticky kind”, i.e. the small particles that actually adhere to artery walls (not the fluffy LDL particles that bounce away), are actually good!! On his “Final Issues 2” slide, and later in his related pictorial slides (entitled “What Causes Coronary Heart Disease?”), he makes reference to [LDL] cholesterol as a “Misunderstood Hero”?
•  That small, sticky LDL particles actually help the body recover from the damage created by the real culprits… sugars that work in concert with certain bacterias to create micro-tears in our artery walls
•  That small, sticky LDL actually results in the belt-and-suspenders, Rube-Goldberg “spackle” [which again I infer from Dr. Diamond’s presentation ultimately becomes plaque], that fixes (admittedly in a suboptimal and too-late manner) the damage already done by the artery-tearing, sugar/bacteria combo.  Plaque caused by LDL is actually the ‘finger in the dike’, last ditch effort, to fix the artery tears!  Kind of the last line of defense. [see slides on page 53 and Dr. Diamond’s related YouTube discussion.]

As a result, just curious about your thoughts on Dr. Diamond’s hypotheses.  
1.  Am I getting Dr. Diamond’s message(s) right?
2.  If yes, do you concur with – or tend toward – the theory(-ies) supported by Dr. Diamond and other cited experts about the role of cholesterol in CHD?  I gather from your blog post that you sympathize with his glycation theory(-ies), but how about the rest?
3.  If yes again, does that change some of the TYP direction?  For example, a significant part of the TYP approach is to reduce, as much as possible, small LDL particles. If LDL – and thus the resulting plaque – is indeed a suboptimal last line of defense, does reduction of LDL particles lead to a sub-optimization of the body’s last-ditch defense/“back-up plan” to deal with arterial microtears?
4.  Also, knowing that plaque/“spackle” is admittedly a suboptimal last ditch effort, what consequence does reversing plaque ultimately have given that the real damage – the tears in the artery walls (the seemingly real CHD culprits) – has already occurred. Are we pulling the finger out of the dike… without addressing the real root cause of the problem?  â€¦and if yes, what’s the back-up plan to the body’s back-up plan? If we reduce LDL and plaque, and the arterial damage is already done due to years and years of sugar abuse, what plugs the dike then?  I’m not talking about the preventive approaches of avoiding glycation in the first place… obviously that seems to be the real, preventive answer. I’m referring to those of us – for whom preventative measures are too late because the microtears are already there – who might be already living with the consequences of years of potentially errant diet/health guidance (by Keys, NCEP, etc.) and thus “spackle” in our arteries?  If the "spackle" is removed, does the dike start leaking again?

Although I thought I was “on the path to CHD righteousness”, I’m now confused again as a result of Dr. Diamond’s insights. Thanks for any clarifications Dr. Davis!

Dr. Davis,
I'm also anxious to hear what you think of the "hero" role of LDL in plaque.  I'm hoping he didn't go too far off the reservation on this point because the entire hour long presentation was so well done (comprehensive, well-explained, and credentialed) that it will be a powerful aid in spreading the word on both carbohydrates and how messed up the typical GP is with cholesterol treatment (not their fault - but the ATP-III as you say).  It was the tipping point for me.  I'm going off Lipitor now, which I"ve been on for years and will look into your TYP program to ensure I'm doing the right thing.

HI, Joe--

This "hero" thing, to my knowledge, is extrapolation and supposition. It is an interesting notion. I, too, was impressed with his presentation, but I think that the "hero" thing paints LDL as an entirely innocent player and I don't believe it is. We have only to look at people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who can have heart attacks in their 30s with pure large LDL to know that there is more to LDL's behavior than a protective function.

Hi, G--

By providing the link to Dr. Diamond's wonderful talk, I didn't mean to suggest that everything he says should be taken as gospel.

Virtually everything he said up until the "spackle" I do agree with. The spackle argument is pure supposition. It makes sense, but only to a degree and ignores the quantitative (e.g., heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) and qualitative (small, oxidation- and glycation-prone LDL particles with unique conformations that differ from larger LDL) differences in LDL particles.

Nonetheless, Dr. Diamond's recounting of how this mess was created was enlightening and well-presented and I still enjoyed it.

Dr. Davis,

I watched Dr. Diamond's presentation in its entirety.  I agree that he's done some great investigative medicine, especially looking into long-established research on carbohydrate intake, and, more recently, digging into questions of research funding and conflicts of interest.

His presentation leaves me with a major question about the role of cholesterol.  Diamond claims that high cholesterol levels are not harmful, so long as they are below 300 mg/dL, and that cholesterol has a helpful role.  It is used by arteries to repair themselves after the arterial lining is torn, infected by bacteria, or otherwise damaged.  This is why, he says, we find cholesterol in atherosclerotic plaques, together with white blood cells and dead bacteria.  Yet, we know from your reports and others that an elevated LDL particle number *is* correlated with coronary events.

What's going on here?  Is cholesterol itself harmful, or is high particle number just another symptom of high carbohydrate intake, which causes glycation and loss of elasticity in the arterial walls, leading to damage?

I just read the other comments, so the above question has been answered.  Thanks for all the info!

Hi Brian--
While I truly enjoyed Dr. Diamond's presentation, I think this particular path leads us down a dead end.

I don't think cholesterol per se is harmful; I believe that the particles that contain, among many other things, cholesterol can be harmful, especially small, oxidation-prone, glycation-prone LDL particles. I believe it would be an incredible stretch to say that small LDL particles are somehow protective.

I have inherited cholesterol and just learned from my health store guy that all the grains I have been eating are likely responsible for the high numbers of my small LDL(527) particles.  I thought oatmeal and other whole grains would squeege-mop the bad guys out of my system.  This news is also likely why I haven't  lost any weight (I eat lots of veggies and apples, fibrous fruits and protein.)  I do not use processed foods at all.  I walk a mile to work each day and I am still 10-20 # overweight (and yes it is right in my middle.)  My health guy is the one who directed me to this blog.  Any other information is most welcome.  I am trying to figure out what to fix everyday (supper/dinner) is the hardest.
Joan phillips