Vitamin D Newsletter-Autism and Vitamin D

Although Dr. John Cannell's most recent Vitamin D Newsletter concerns the connection between autism and vitamin D, and has nothing to do with coronary plaque reversal, this fascinating discussion between a mother of an autistic boy and Dr. Cannell is so enlightening that I thought that it was still worth passing on.

I also feel very deeply for parents with autistic children, who I see struggle with the developmental difficulties their children encounter. (I even have several patients who are parents of 2 or 3 autistic children.)

As always, Dr. Cannell is at the cutting-edge of converting hard scientific information into practical use. You will note several points or questions raised:

1) Dr. Cannell advocates a powdered capsule form of vitamin D. In my experience, most powdered or tablet forms do not work. But some do. He apparently has success with the brand he specifies.

2) Are there vitamin D-receptor (VDR) genotypes that respond differently? Should there be different 25 (OH) vitamin D blood level targets for different VDR genotypes? Nobody knows yet, but it will be an important question to explore in the future.

3) Is heavy metal toxicity, at least in its milder forms, a surrogate for vitamin D deficiency? (Are chelationists unwittingly treating vitamin D deficiency?)

4) If this is a genuine association, and vitamin D replenishment exerts profound neurologic effects in autistic children, does a similar, though less marked effect, hold in non-autistic children? Will children perform better, learn more effectively, etc. with vitamin D supplementation to normal levels?

5) Vitamin A--Is vitamin A with vitamin D good or bad? This one I do not have an answer to. Reading the literature Dr. Cannell cites didn't help much. (Dr. BG--Any comments? Dr. BG is a vitamin A advocate.)


Perhaps, should the association between autism and vitamin D hold, it raises more questions than it settles. But, true to my experience with vitamin D, every day I stumble on some unique, fascinating effect, all beneficial. We continue to learn new lessons about vitamin D and Dr. Cannell's insights as a practicing psychiatrist deeply concerned with vitamin D issues have helped enormously.

(Sorry, but I did not copy the links to the literature Dr. Cannell cites. To obtain the links, go to the original Vitamin D Newsletter.)

The Vitamin D Newsletter
June 2008




This month we feature a remarkable series of letters from a mother of an autistic son who treated her child with vitamin D. It is the first case report in the medical literature suggesting vitamin D has a treatment effect in autism.

First, a brief case report and then a more detailed exchange of emails between the mother and me.

Case Report:

John is a seven-year old boy living in the northeastern U.S. with a long-standing diagnosis of autism. Symptoms include temper tantrums, repetitive self-stimulatory behavior, impaired language, mood swings, fear of being alone, toileting problems, dysbacteriosis, and impaired muscle strength. John spends a lot of time outdoors starting in the spring and his mother noticed a distinct seasonal variation in his symptoms in that he improved in the summer and regressed in the winter. A 25-hydroxy-vitamin D in April of 2008 was 25 ng/ml and obtained after John had begun to play outside. Due to the seasonality of John's symptoms the mother consulted me. I advised the mother to stop all products containing vitamin A including cod liver oil and begin John on 5,000 IU of vitamin D3 per day for two weeks followed by 2,000 IU per day in the form of powdered vitamin D dissolved in juice. Within a week of starting the vitamin D, John's language began to return and he was no longer as fearful of being alone. At the end of two weeks his language showed further improvement, he began to toilet himself, counted to 10 and knew the spelling of his name. After three weeks language continued to improve and some improvements were noted in his dysbacteriosis. After four weeks of vitamin D treatment, the mother noted improvements in muscle strength as well as continued improvements in language. A repeat 25-hydroxy-vitamin D is pending while John continues taking 2,000 IU of vitamin D per day.

Before you read the series of emails between the mother and me, I'd like to caution that this is only a case report of sorts and does not prove a treatment effect. Spontaneous remissions, while rare in autism, have been reported, thus the supplemental vitamin D may have had nothing to do with his improvement. If the response is due to vitamin D, there is no assurance it will prove lasting. I think it unlikely that older autistic children or individuals with severe autism will show these sorts of apparent improvements. Furthermore, autism is a multifactorial disease with strong genetic roots and it is highly unlikely that treatment of vitamin D deficiency in all autistic children will result in similar improvements. Finally, I did not examine this child, and I am relying on the child's mother to report both his condition and his apparent response to vitamin D treatment. However, the mother agreed to speak with the press about her son and allow for independent confirmation of the apparent treatment response.

Below are the emails, edited for brevity, clarity, and confidentiality.



Dear Dr. Cannell:

I am writing because I believe my son John is strongly affected by vitamin D and I need some advice. John is seven and autistic and weighs 50 pounds. We live in the northeastern part of the United States . He starts spending lots of time outside in May and continues until September. Every year, like clockwork, he has the same patterns of behavior and ability. After about six weeks of sun exposure, every July, he begins feeling much better, seems to be comfortable in his skin, does not have as much self-stimulatory behavior, can eat a variety of foods and has language. This past summer, he was using 14-word sentences. By the end of November, he can't even ask you for a cup of juice. He becomes more exclusive, has emotional highs and lows, has tantrums and is easily frustrated.

His 25(OH)D level on April 15th was 25 ng/ml but he had already been going out in the sun so his level must have been lower in the winter. I have had his genetics tested (Nutrigenomic) and he has mutations in his vitamin D receptors:

VDR Bsm/Taq ++
VDR Fok --
VDR Taq ++

My first question, does it sound like the changes in his behaviors and abilities could be caused by lack of vitamin D? Could you elaborate on the time it would take to get adequate amounts of vitamin D to start seeing positive results? For example, even if he starts going out in the sun in May, it's usually not until July that I see positive changes. Then would it take a month or two to go back to being deficient, thus explaining his 'regression' by the time November comes around. Secondly, I am looking at different forms of vitamin D therapy: a vitamin D lamp, vitamin D3 cream, or oral vitamin D. Can you tell me what might be the best form during the winter months?

Thank you very much for your time and attention.

Jane, Boston MA



Dear Jane:

Yes, it is possible your son's autism is related to vitamin D. Such seasonality has been reported before in autism, both in an individual and in autistic children at a summer camp. Although suggestive, such seasonality does not prove a vitamin D connection. Sun exposure, unless it is full body, takes several months to get vitamin D levels up. If sunblock or clothes are worn sun exposure will not get 25(OH)D levels much above 30 ng/ml. As far as the "mutations" you list, they are actually vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and not referred to as mutations although all such changes occurred through mutations at some time in the past. VDR polymorphisms are simply the different structures of the vitamin D receptor that different people have and they are widely distributed. A pilot study of actual VDR receptor mutations did not detect VDR mutations in 24 autistic individuals but they did not assess for VDR polymorphisms. However, a highly significant association exists between one VDR polymorphism and larger head size. Mean head circumference is larger in autism.

Yan J, et al. Vitamin D receptor variants in 192 patients with schizophrenia and other psychiatric diseases. Neurosci Lett 2005;380(1-2):37-41.

Handoko HY, et al. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and their associations with risk of schizophrenia and selected anthropometric measures. Am J Hum Biol 2006;18(3):415-7.

Lainhart JE, et al. Head circumference and height in autism: a study by the Collaborative Program of Excellence in Autism. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140(21):2257-74.

Lainhart JE, et al. Macrocephaly in children and adults with autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36(2):282-90.

I emailed the world's foremost expert on VDR polymorphisms asking him about your son's polymorphisms and his reply, quite technical, is below.



Dear John:

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you regarding VDR polymorphisms. Initial studies by Eisman and coworkers many years ago suggested that several of the polymorphs identified above in the VDR gene (Bsm/Tag) correlated strongly with osteoporosis. Despite the hoopla, subsequent analyses by many different investigators did not really confirm these results, i.e. only a very modest (3%) correlation. This spawned multiple studies searching for correlations between VDR polymorph's and cancer, autoimmune disease and so forth. It is fair to say from all of these studies that the correlation is at best weak, and in most cases non-existent. Part of this may be due to the fact that the Bsm and Taq polymorphs are located in VDR gene introns and as a first approximation cannot affect the VDR protein's function. This is not an absolute statement, however, as our work is now showing that regulatory regions that control the VDR's expression are located within introns as well as upstream. Therefore the possibility exists that these polymorphs could affect expression, although we have not found these regions to contain enhancers yet. This is clearly where gene and disease studies are going. The only polymorph that could affect function is the Fok1 site, which we identified many years ago following our initial cloning and structural analysis of the human VDR gene. The presence of this site leads to the expression of a shorter VDR protein (424 aa) that is purported to have a slight increase in transcriptional activity (10%?) vs the large protein (427 aa). The above analysis suggests that this polymorph is absent, leading to production of the larger perhaps less active protein. On a single patient basis, it is really difficult to conclude anything regarding this finding. Indeed, despite large numbers of patients, the VDR polymorph have not really revealed any significant insight. Given the summer correlations, it is probably more likely that the individual is low in vitamin D3 in winter.

Sincerely,

Professor John Doe




Thus, one of your son's polymorphisms may have less functionality but that should be easily overcome by higher vitamin D levels. The first thing to do is stop all vitamin A, multivitamins containing vitamin A, or cod liver oil and start vitamin D. As you will see below, vitamin A antagonizes the action of vitamin D and he should have plenty of vitamin A if he eats colorful vegetables, colorful fruit, eggs and fortified oatmeal. As far as vitamin D, I think the easiest way to give vitamin D is powdered capsules, not a cream. You can open the capsule and put the powder in about anything, such as juice. To buy the capsules, go toBio Tech Pharmacal and buy both a bottle of the 5,000 and the 1,000 IU capsules. He should take one 5,000 IU capsule a day for two weeks then take 2,000 IU per day. After a month, go to the doctor and have another 25-hydroxy-vitamin D blood test. Do not let your doctor order a 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D as it will give you and your doctor false information about your son's vitamin D status. The other option is buying a Sperti vitamin D light. Daily use of the light on both sides of his trunk will raise levels fairly quickly but he should still have a 25(OH)D blood test every month to assure his levels rise to the mid level of normal ranges, about 70 ng/ml. Vitamin D is very safe. Your son would have to take more than 10,000 IU a day for more than a year to have any risk of toxicity. If he improves and his level is 50 ng/ml, the next question is would he improve even more if his level was 70 ng/ml? Some lifeguards have levels of 80-100 ng/ml; normal ranges in the labs in the USA are 30 -100 ng/ml (ideal ranges are 50 -100 ng/ml.) If you have any more questions, let me know. I certainly want to know how he is doing.

Sincerely,

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been one week on 5,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily and already we're getting some language back! We haven't had original language since probably around the end of November. The only language we have had in the past five months has been verbal scripting. Today John has already told me "turn off the TV" and "clean up the water". This is all very exciting. Will it last? I will continue to keep you updated on progress and change in behavior. One more thing, all winter long he was afraid to be by himself anywhere. Now he is starting to be able to be in another room or outside by himself.

Thanks so much,

Jane



Dear Jane:

I can't tell you how happy I am for you. I suspect John will continue to improve. Do you have any parent rating scales or does his treating pediatrician have any objective rating scales? If you have before and after rating scales or his treating doctor does then it becomes important to track his progress on an objective measure. Jane, if you are a member of any autism discussion groups, you should post about this, including doses used. If your son's case is typical, then hundreds of thousands of autistic children may be helped with vitamin D.

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been two weeks on 5,000 IU per day and I want to inform you that we are having continued success with language. Continued in the sense that it is consistent, it wasn't just a one day fluke. In addition, he is taking himself to the bathroom; this is another thing that goes away in winter months. I usually have to catch him holding it in and then suggest he go, but now he is going completely by himself. In therapy last week, he started drawing again. He drew a bee and then ran around the room buzzing. His toileting is consistent with his therapists, not just mommy. Last night, I asked him to count to 10 for me and he did - quite enthusiastically. Then I said what does J-O-H-N spell? It took him a bit but then he said "John."

Unfortunately, the last scale taken was when he was 3 when he had his first developmental evaluation. But we do track behavior and language on a weekly basis. The forms we fill out give a good indication as to how he is doing.

I belong to a parent forum. It was created by a doctor named Amy Yasko. She's a PhD, a researcher, not a medical doctor. It was through her that I got John's genetics tested. She advocates vitamin D as being very crucial. I will post something on her forum for the parents there. However, if the parents on the forum are following her recommendations, they should be taking it already - 2000 IUs in winter and 1000 IUs in summer is her recommendation. I will post something on the forum to really emphasize how important vitamin D is.

Jane



Dear Jane:

I'm glad the improvements are continuing. I see Dr. Yasko recommends 10,000 IU of vitamin A/day as well as cod liver oil. I strongly disagree. Make sure your son is taking neither vitamin A nor cod liver oil. Rather, make sure he eats colored fruits and vegetables as well as fortified oatmeal. Vitamin A interferes with vitamin D's function, especially at the doses Dr. Yasko recommends.

Vitamin A antagonizes the action of vitamin D. In humans, even the vitamin A in a single serving of liver impairs vitamin D’s rapid intestinal calcium response. Furthermore, the consumption of preformed retinols, even in amounts consumed by many Americans in both multivitamins and cod liver oil appears to be causing low-grade, but widespread, bone toxicity, perhaps through its antagonism of vitamin D. In a recent dietary intake study, Kyungwon et al found high retinol intake completely thwarted vitamin D’s otherwise protective effect on distal colorectal adenoma and they found a clear relationship between vitamin D and vitamin A intakes as the women in the highest quintile of vitamin D intake also ingested almost 10,000 IU of retinols/day. As early as 1933, Hess et al warned about vitamin A consumption, concluding, “as to a requirement of thousands of units of vitamin A daily, the unquestionable answer is that this constitutes therapeutic absurdity, which, happily, will prove to be only a passing fad.”

Rohde CM, Deluca HF. All-trans retinoic acid antagonizes the action of calciferol and its active metabolite, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, in rats. J Nutr. 2005;135(7):1647-1652.

Johansson S, Melhus H. Vitamin A antagonizes calcium response to vitamin D in man. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(10):1899-1905.

Penniston KL, Tanumihardjo SA. The acute and chronic toxic effects of vitamin A. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):191-201.

Oh K, Willett WC, Wu K, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL. Calcium and vitamin D intakes in relation to risk of distal colorectal adenoma in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(10):1178-1186.

Hess AF, Lewis JM, Barenberg LH. Does our dietary require vitamin A supplement? JAMA. 1933;101:657-663.

Unfortunately, Hess’s prophecy of a passing fad proved premature and many Americans continue to consume “absurd” and dangerous quantities of vitamin A. For example, multivitamins, until recently, had small amounts of vitamin D (200 to 400 IU) but high amounts of preformed retinols (5,000 to 10,000 IU). This pales in comparison to a tablespoon of modern cod liver oil, which contains sub-physiological amounts of vitamin D (400 to 1200 IU) but supra-physiological amounts of completely preformed retinols (5,000 to 15,000 IU or in some cases 30,000 IU).

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been three weeks and he went from 5,000 IU of vitamin D per day to 2,000 IU per day a week ago. His language is increasing. He's now back to saying the things he wants with some prompting. He also has gut dysbiosis and I'm sure the D is helping with microbes in his gut. He has a lot of problems with his immune system and bacteria and viruses. Also, doesn't vitamin D aid in the production of glutathione? I feel that could be a big part of his increased language.

Jane



Dear Jane:

Yes, abnormal immune responses are associated with both autism and vitamin D deficiency. For example, autistic individuals have immune abnormalities that show a striking similarity to the immune functions affected by vitamin D. Animal evidence indicates some vitamin D deficiency induced brain damage may be malleable, that is, vitamin D may partially reverse the brain damage, if given early enough. These studies offer hope that sunlight or oral vitamin D, especially in young autistic children, may have a treatment effect.

Ashwood P, et al. The immune response in autism: a new frontier for autism research. J Leukoc Biol 2006;80(1):1-15.

Cantorna MT, et al. Vitamin D status, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the immune system. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(6 Suppl):1717S-20S.

Burne TH, et al. Combined prenatal and chronic postnatal vitamin D deficiency in rats impairs prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle. Physiol Behav 2004;81(4):651-5.

Both the brain and the blood of autistic individuals show evidence of ongoing chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. That is, the disease process is probably increasingly destructive. Further hope for a treatment effect rests in activated vitamin D's powerful anti-inflammatory properties. Its administration reduces production of inflammatory cytokines in the brain, which have consistently been associated with cognitive impairment. Furthermore, activated vitamin D is remarkably neuroprotective by stimulating neurotropin release, reducing toxic cellular calcium levels in the brain, inhibiting the production of nitrous oxide, and by its immunomodulating properties, especially in reducing inflammatory cytokines and by increasing brain glutathione.

Moore ME, Piazza A, McCartney Y, Lynch MA. Evidence that vitamin D3 reverses age-related inflammatory changes in the rat hippocampus. Biochem Soc Trans 2005;33(Pt 4):573-7.

Cohen-Lahav M, Shany S, Tobvin D, Chaimovitz C, Douvdevani A. Vitamin D decreases NFkappaB activity by increasing IkappaBalpha levels. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21(4):889-97

Kalueff AV, Eremin KO, Tuohimaa P. Mechanisms of neuroprotective action of vitamin d(3). Biochemistry (Mosc) 2004;69(7):738-41.

This last function of vitamin D, increasing cellular levels of glutathione, may explain the purported link between heavy metals, oxidative stress, and autism. For example, activated vitamin D reduces iron-induced and zinc-induced oxidative injuries in rat brain. The primary route for the neurotoxicity of most heavy metals is through depletion of glutathione and subsequent generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Besides its function as a master antioxidant, glutathione acts as a chelating (binding) agent to remove heavy metals. Several studies indicate autistic individuals have difficulty excreting heavy metals, especially mercury. If vitamin D deficient brains are unable to utilize glutathione properly, and thus unable to remove heavy metals, they may be oxidatively damaged by heavy metal loads normal children easily excrete. The amount of activated vitamin D in the brain directly depends on how much vitamin D is made in the skin or put in the mouth.

Garcion E, Wion-Barbot N, Montero-Menei CN, Berger F, Wion D. New clues about vitamin D functions in the nervous system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13(3):100-5.

Chen KB, Lin AM, Chiu TH. Systemic vitamin D3 attenuated oxidative injuries in the locus coeruleus of rat brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;993:313-24.

Lin AM, Chen KB, Chao PL. Antioxidative effect of vitamin D3 on zinc-induced oxidative stress in CNS. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1053:319-29.

Valko M, Morris H, Cronin MT. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem 2005;12(10):1161-208

Kern JK, Jones AM. Evidence of toxicity, oxidative stress, and neuronal insult in autism. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2006;9(6):485-99.

Sincerely,

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been a month now and John's Improvements are continuing. In the last week, he has been using his muscles more, he goes on the swing outside and lifts his legs and bends in ways that take core muscle strength. This is yet another skill or interest that left and is returning. I will report more next week.
Jane




Conclusion:

It is too early to say vitamin D has a treatment effect in autism. However, a simple risk/benefit analysis suggests that autistic children should be diagnosed and aggressively treated for vitamin D deficiency. If readers want to learn more about vitamin D and autism, they can obtain the entire paper on the link below. Unfortunately, Elsevier charges $31.50 to download it. You can read a similar document for free on the website, where we first published the theory a year ago.

Cannell JJ. Autism and vitamin D. Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(4):750-9.

http://vitamindcouncil.org/newsletter/2007-may.shtml

In summation, autistic children should be given enough vitamin D to get their 25(OH)D levels up to the mid to high range of normals, that is, 70 ng/ml (175 nmol/L in countries that use the metric system). In the absence of sun exposure, this usually requires long-term administration of about 1,000 IU/day per 20 pounds of body weight with a loading dose of 2,000 IU of vitamin D/day for every 20 pounds of body weight for the first two weeks. As individual variation in response is very high, they should have 25(OH)D blood tests every month until their level has stabilized around 70 ng/ml. They should stop all products containing preformed retinols (vitamin A), especially cod liver oil.

John Cannell, MD
The Vitamin D Council

This is a periodic newsletter from the Vitamin D Council, a non-profit trying to end the epidemic of vitamin D deficiency. If you don't want to get the newsletter, please hit reply and let us know. As we are a 501(3)(c) non-profit corporation, dedicated to ending vitamin D deficiency and not making money, the Vitamin D Council does not copyright this newsletter. Please reproduce it and post it on Internet sites. If this newsletter proves useful to a child you know with autism, the Vitamin D Council asks for a donation as we have not been able to secure a grant and our bank account balance is again below $5,000. Send your tax-deductible contributions to:

The Vitamin D Council
9100 San Gregorio Road
Atascadero, CA 93422

Comments (16) -

  • concerned heart

    6/1/2008 4:30:00 PM |

    Vitamin D3 is wonderful vitamin, but it won't change the brain defects in severe autism.



    One cause of non-familial autism is an older father at conception that results in mutations in sperm DNA and possible autism, schizophrenia, cancers, birth defects etc. etc. People need to be informed about the male biological clock. Of course in familial autism, schizophrenia, Alheimer's, cancers, the mutations happened in earlier generations.


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2059130/Scientists-reveal-dangers-of--older-fathers.html


    http://how-old-is-too-old.blogspot.com/

  • Dr. B G

    6/1/2008 5:12:00 PM |

    Like you, I believe we need to 'eat food'.  Whole, balanced, high quality food provides all that our bodies require. (And supplements fill in when these requirements cannot be met.)

    Perhaps Cannell is aware of an interaction betw these VDR polymorphisms and excessive doses of pre-formed retinol? I agree with Cannell that high doses of Vitamin A (which can be accumulated due its fat-soluble nature) can antagonize and create the same problems Vit A is supposed to prevent/tx: osteoporosis, proliferation, inflammation, etc (much like vitamin D toxicity). BTW New formulations of cod liver oil have 75% less vit A now. Chris Masterjohn has tried to address the vit A and vit D conflict.
    http://www.greenpasture.org/content/VitaminA.pdf

    What is autism? Is it sign of many deficiencies and environmental interactions (both maternal and neonatal/pedi)??
    1) in utero effects from maternal conditions (maternal low steroid/chol diet, low EPA/DHA diet, vitamin D hypovitaminosis low vit A diet)?
    2) neonatal/pediatric vit D hypovitaminosis? (which can lead to Pb++/lead nonselective uptake?)
    3) wheat exposure and silent celiac dz (and subsequently deficient immunity which can lead to fungal/eukaryotic/yeast infxns)?

    Stocker CJ, et al. Fetal origins of insulin resistance and obesity.
    Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 May;64(2):143-51. PMID: 15960859

    Antipatis C, et al. Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency affects perinatal organ growth and development in rats. Br J Nutr. 2000 Jul;84(1):125-32. PMID: 10961169

    Morris GS, et al.Maternal consumption of a low vitamin D diet retards metabolic and contractile development in the neonatal rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Jun;27(6):1245-50. PMID: 8531206

    Gallagher EA, et al. The effect of low protein diet in pregnancy on the development of brain metabolism in rat offspring.
    J Physiol. 2005 Oct 15;568(Pt 2):553-8. PMID: 16081486

    -G

  • Dr. B G

    6/1/2008 5:12:00 PM |

    Like you, I believe we need to 'eat food'.  Whole, balanced, high quality food provides all that our bodies require. (And supplements fill in when these requirements cannot be met.)

    Perhaps Cannell is aware of an interaction betw these VDR polymorphisms and excessive doses of pre-formed retinol? I agree with Cannell that high doses of Vitamin A (which can be accumulated due its fat-soluble nature) can antagonize and create the same problems Vit A is supposed to prevent/tx: osteoporosis, proliferation, inflammation, etc (much like vitamin D toxicity). BTW New formulations of cod liver oil have 75% less vit A now. Chris Masterjohn has tried to address the vit A and vit D conflict.
    http://www.greenpasture.org/content/VitaminA.pdf

    What is autism? Is it sign of many deficiencies and environmental interactions (both maternal and neonatal/pedi)??
    1) in utero effects from maternal conditions (maternal low steroid/chol diet, low EPA/DHA diet, vitamin D hypovitaminosis low vit A diet)?
    2) neonatal/pediatric vit D hypovitaminosis? (which can lead to Pb++/lead nonselective uptake?)
    3) wheat exposure and silent celiac dz (and subsequently deficient immunity which can lead to fungal/eukaryotic/yeast infxns)?

    Stocker CJ, et al. Fetal origins of insulin resistance and obesity.
    Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 May;64(2):143-51. PMID: 15960859

    Antipatis C, et al. Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency affects perinatal organ growth and development in rats. Br J Nutr. 2000 Jul;84(1):125-32. PMID: 10961169

    Morris GS, et al.Maternal consumption of a low vitamin D diet retards metabolic and contractile development in the neonatal rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Jun;27(6):1245-50. PMID: 8531206

    Gallagher EA, et al. The effect of low protein diet in pregnancy on the development of brain metabolism in rat offspring.
    J Physiol. 2005 Oct 15;568(Pt 2):553-8. PMID: 16081486

    -G

  • Richard A.

    6/1/2008 8:11:00 PM |

    DHA from fish oil might be beneficial for Autism also. Carlson's Super-DHA contains 500mg of DHA per normal sized softgel. Jarrow's Max DHA contains 250mg of DHA per smaller sized softgel.

  • Anonymous

    6/1/2008 10:47:00 PM |

    "5) Vitamin A--Is vitamin D with vitamin D good or bad?"

    I'm sure you meant so say: Is vitamin A with vitamin D good or bad?

    Lynn

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/1/2008 11:44:00 PM |

    Thanks, Lynn.

  • Stephan

    6/2/2008 8:08:00 PM |

    I have a VERY hard time believing that preformed vitamin A in the amounts found in liver/cod liver oil are unhealthy.  

    Our hunter-gatherer ancestors almost certainly prized liver, as do modern HG groups.  Weston Price identified a high intake of vitamin A as one of the characteristics of traditional cultures that have excellent bone and dental health.  That indicates good mineral metabolism.  With empirical evidence like that, it's hard to take seriously predictions based on molecular arguments and weak epidemiological associations.  

    What I might be willing to believe is that vitamin A is harmful in the presence of vitamin D deficiency.  All the cultures Price studied presumably got plenty of vitamin D from sunlight.  

    It makes no sense that vitamin A would seriously interfere with vitamin D function, considering our ancestors have been getting plenty of both for the last million years or more.

  • Jessica

    6/2/2008 9:07:00 PM |

    "Dr. Cannell advocates a powdered capsule form of vitamin D. In my experience, most powdered or tablet forms do not work. But some do. He apparently has success with the brand he specifies."

    Myself, my dad, my physician, and our patients (thousands of them) have had much success using the 5,000 IU tablets from Bio-Pharm as Dr. Cannell mentioned. We've seen significant increases in 25-OH levels from the tablet form.

  • Dr. B G

    6/3/2008 3:50:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I believe Cannell uses the powdered capsules as a convenient dosage form for children to be sprinkled on to food. (I think?)

    Stephan -- I totally agree!  Could Cannell have come up with incorrect conclusions from confounding data?

    The only time I found antagonism between vitamin A and vitamin D is in the situation of vitamin D deficiency (as you said) -- and each of the examples Cannell lists are such cases (all the animals, all the men and the women  -- for the humans, I assumed because frequently reported EVERYONE in the world has 25(OH)D < 55-60 ng/ml below the  TYP goal/normal).

    This is the only explanation I could come up with (because otherwise it doesn't make sense, right? to me or my nutritionist who consumes Blue Ice highly distilled cod liver oil daily).

    In the trials Cannell lists, I would assume that vitamin D deficiency is the baseline case (in the colorectal trial, vit D intake > or < 400 IU/d was studied -- and we all are aware that is woefully inadequate, by a magnitude of TEN).  Also, for the in vitro studies, all the animals were first UVB deprived then fed only vitamin D-depleted and retinol-depleted diets, and therefore all the VDRs (vitamin D receptors) and vitamin A receptors were nonexistent/downregulated.  For humans, 6-8wks are required for vit D benefits to be exerted via supplementation, and the experiments did not provide enough time for that.  The experimental conditions were extreme... Yet probably mirrors the general population -- sun-deprived and excessively vitamin D depleted (again not individuals who follow TYP!).

    Evolutionary-wise, humans had abundant sun (vitamin D), abundant movement and abundant vitamin A-rich foods.  When abundant vitamins A and D are together, toxicity of either one does not appear to occur... neither in the literature nor reality (that I have found). I have looked hard for it.  What I found was that high dose vitamin A and D are used to treat cancers to reduce proliferation and inflammation -- prostate, breast and colon at several oncology centers in the U.S.  

    Just as there are antagonism petri dish trials, there are in vitro SYNERGISM trials for vitamin A and D where 'normal' cells were used which were not depleted of vitamins A and D prior to experimentation (see the 'Astaxanthin' post).  The UL (upper limit) of Vitamin A is 10,000 IU/d -- from diet and supplements. I think this is great 'dose' for any age adult provided they have adequate vitamin D repletion... with 25(OH)D3 ~60 ng/ml. I think the context of Vitamin D status and degree of repletion needs to be always addressed when looking at a vitamin A trial.  It is like many things in the human body -- all interconnected and inter-related. (or like life?)  

    Here, in the DeLuca article that Cannell cites... the researchers in fact found with HIGH DOSE ergocalciferol and HIGH DOSE cholecalciferol, NO ANTAGONISM with either Retinyl Palmitate OR all-trans-retinoic-acid occurred. Funny...?

    I wonder why this did not make the abstract?? (perhaps this is what happens when DeLuca --the 'Godfather' of Vitamin D -- works for a drug company?  *wink wink*).  
    http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/135/7/1647

    TABLE 2 Retinyl acetate does not antagonize higher amounts of ergocalciferol in rats (Expt. 1)1

    TABLE 6 ATRA does not antagonize higher amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 in rats (Expt. 3)1

    We have seen in the past other antagonistic things can happen with 'good' nutritional factors in the context of vitamin D deficiency:
    --calcium supplementation -- leads to more coronary plaque growth

    I find Cannell's thoughts on this similar to the people who 'damned' estrogen for women. In the WHI trial, when Estrogen was given to women 15-20 years AFTER menopause -- after all the ERs (estrogen receptors) had disappeared -- estrogen caused more strokes, heart attacks and breast CA. However, when estrogen was provided during perimenopause (when the ERs were still in place and intact and functional), benefits were seen like vascular integrity maintained, heart protection, MI/stroke prevention, and even breast cancer prevention. (And as you can imagine, estrogen has a role in TYP!)

    -G

  • Dr. B G

    6/3/2008 3:50:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I believe Cannell uses the powdered capsules as a convenient dosage form for children to be sprinkled on to food. (I think?)

    Stephan -- I totally agree!  Could Cannell have come up with incorrect conclusions from confounding data?

    The only time I found antagonism between vitamin A and vitamin D is in the situation of vitamin D deficiency (as you said) -- and each of the examples Cannell lists are such cases (all the animals, all the men and the women  -- for the humans, I assumed because frequently reported EVERYONE in the world has 25(OH)D < 55-60 ng/ml below the  TYP goal/normal).

    This is the only explanation I could come up with (because otherwise it doesn't make sense, right? to me or my nutritionist who consumes Blue Ice highly distilled cod liver oil daily).

    In the trials Cannell lists, I would assume that vitamin D deficiency is the baseline case (in the colorectal trial, vit D intake > or < 400 IU/d was studied -- and we all are aware that is woefully inadequate, by a magnitude of TEN).  Also, for the in vitro studies, all the animals were first UVB deprived then fed only vitamin D-depleted and retinol-depleted diets, and therefore all the VDRs (vitamin D receptors) and vitamin A receptors were nonexistent/downregulated.  For humans, 6-8wks are required for vit D benefits to be exerted via supplementation, and the experiments did not provide enough time for that.  The experimental conditions were extreme... Yet probably mirrors the general population -- sun-deprived and excessively vitamin D depleted (again not individuals who follow TYP!).

    Evolutionary-wise, humans had abundant sun (vitamin D), abundant movement and abundant vitamin A-rich foods.  When abundant vitamins A and D are together, toxicity of either one does not appear to occur... neither in the literature nor reality (that I have found). I have looked hard for it.  What I found was that high dose vitamin A and D are used to treat cancers to reduce proliferation and inflammation -- prostate, breast and colon at several oncology centers in the U.S.  

    Just as there are antagonism petri dish trials, there are in vitro SYNERGISM trials for vitamin A and D where 'normal' cells were used which were not depleted of vitamins A and D prior to experimentation (see the 'Astaxanthin' post).  The UL (upper limit) of Vitamin A is 10,000 IU/d -- from diet and supplements. I think this is great 'dose' for any age adult provided they have adequate vitamin D repletion... with 25(OH)D3 ~60 ng/ml. I think the context of Vitamin D status and degree of repletion needs to be always addressed when looking at a vitamin A trial.  It is like many things in the human body -- all interconnected and inter-related. (or like life?)  

    Here, in the DeLuca article that Cannell cites... the researchers in fact found with HIGH DOSE ergocalciferol and HIGH DOSE cholecalciferol, NO ANTAGONISM with either Retinyl Palmitate OR all-trans-retinoic-acid occurred. Funny...?

    I wonder why this did not make the abstract?? (perhaps this is what happens when DeLuca --the 'Godfather' of Vitamin D -- works for a drug company?  *wink wink*).  
    http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/135/7/1647

    TABLE 2 Retinyl acetate does not antagonize higher amounts of ergocalciferol in rats (Expt. 1)1

    TABLE 6 ATRA does not antagonize higher amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 in rats (Expt. 3)1

    We have seen in the past other antagonistic things can happen with 'good' nutritional factors in the context of vitamin D deficiency:
    --calcium supplementation -- leads to more coronary plaque growth

    I find Cannell's thoughts on this similar to the people who 'damned' estrogen for women. In the WHI trial, when Estrogen was given to women 15-20 years AFTER menopause -- after all the ERs (estrogen receptors) had disappeared -- estrogen caused more strokes, heart attacks and breast CA. However, when estrogen was provided during perimenopause (when the ERs were still in place and intact and functional), benefits were seen like vascular integrity maintained, heart protection, MI/stroke prevention, and even breast cancer prevention. (And as you can imagine, estrogen has a role in TYP!)

    -G

  • Rita.

    6/3/2008 12:31:00 PM |

    Dr. Mary Megson treats autism with cod liver oil and believes it is the natural (non-synthetic) vitamin A that is primarily responsible. She also does a ton of other stuff with the kids, as do most doctors treating this terrible epidemic.

    Dr Natasha Campbell McBride works on the gut dysbiosis in autistim which causes malabsorbtion of nutrients leading to deficiencies of vitamins and minerals and also accumulation of toxins. Her book, "Gut and Psychology Syndrome" advocates the use of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. She cured her own son's autism.

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/3/2008 10:31:00 PM |

    Dr BG--

    Fascinating arguments.

    I'm beginning to see the logic of your enthusiasm for vitamin A--provided vitamin D is first normalized.

  • Dr. B G

    6/4/2008 4:29:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    It was your 'enthusiasm' for Vitamin D that lead me to TYP...

    And now my asthma (and future health and that of my family) are assuredly as protected as can be.  Thank you for all that you do!

    Kindly, Dr. 'G'

  • Dr. B G

    6/4/2008 4:29:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    It was your 'enthusiasm' for Vitamin D that lead me to TYP...

    And now my asthma (and future health and that of my family) are assuredly as protected as can be.  Thank you for all that you do!

    Kindly, Dr. 'G'

  • Gyan

    6/4/2008 7:07:00 AM |

    Chris Masterjohn's articles on Weston Price site also mention vitamin K2 and its role in preventing vitamin D toxicity.
    He claims that vitamin D toxicty is nothing more than a vitamin K2 deficiency,
    Is it plausible?. Do we need yet another vitamin?

  • Stephan

    6/4/2008 4:55:00 PM |

    Dr BG,

      Thanks, that was very informative.

Loading
Lipitor-ologist

Lipitor-ologist

One of the things I do in practice is consult in complex hyperlipidemias, the collection of lipoprotein disorders that usually, but not always, lead to atherosclerosis.

First order of business: Make the diagnosis--familial combined hyperlipidemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, lipoprotein(a), familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia, familial hypertriglyceridemia, hyperapoprotein B with metabolic syndrome, etc. These are the disorders that start with a genetic variant, e.g., a missing or dysfunctional enzyme or signal protein, such as lipoprotein lipase or apo C3.

I then ask: What can be done that is easy and safe and preferably related to diet and lifestyle?

By following an effective diet, many of these abnormalities can be dramatically corrected, sometimes completely. Familial hypertriglyceridemia, for instance, an inherited disorder of lipoprotein lipase in which triglyceride levels can exceed 1000 mg/dl, high enough to cause pancreatic damage, responds incredibly well to carbohydrate restriction and over-the-counter fish oil. I have a number of these people who enjoy triglyceride levels below 100 mg/dl--unheard of in conventionally treated people with this disorder.

Then why is it that, time after time, I see these people in consult, often as second or third opinions from lipidologists (presumed lipid specialists) or cardiologists, when the only solutions offered are 1) Lipitor or other statin drug, and 2) a low-fat diet? Occasionally, an aggressive lipidologist might offer niacin, a fibrate drug (Tricor or fenofibrate), or Lovaza (prescription fish oil).

Sadly, the world of lipid disorders has been reduced to prescribing a statin drug and little else, 9 times out of 10.

I don't mean to rant, but I continue to be shocked at the incredible influence the drug industry has over not just prescribing patterns, but thinking patterns. Perhaps I should say non-thinking patterns. The drugs make it too easy to feel like the doctor is doing something when, in truth, they are doing the minimum (at best) and missing an opportunity to provide true health-empowering advice that is far more likely to yield maximum control over these patterns with little to no medication.

All in all, I am grateful that there is a growing discipline of "lipidology," a specialty devoted to diagnosing and treating hyperlipidemias. Unfortunately, much of the education of the lipidologist is too heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. Not surprisingly, the drug people favor "education" that highlights their high-revenue products.

Seeing a lipidologist is still better than seeing most primary care physicians or cardiologists. Just beware that you might be walking into the hands of someone who is simply the unwitting puppet of the pharmaceutical industry.

Comments (30) -

  • Anonymous

    9/22/2010 5:42:28 PM |

    ". . .someone who is simply the unwitting puppet of the pharmaceutical industry."

    Unfortunately this seems to be the case with the three primary care doctors I've recently tried to establish a relationship with.  You know you're in trouble when you walk into their exam rooms and the walls are plastered with drug company posters.

  • Jonathan

    9/22/2010 5:58:25 PM |

    Are the pharmaceutical people just getting to the doctors or do they go to the top and influence authority and then the doctor is scared of liability and only follows "best practice" guidelines and nothing more.  How many pharmaceutical employees are expert witnesses in court for cases against doctors who do not give statins?
    Thanks for being brave Dr. Davis.

  • Lucy

    9/22/2010 6:10:45 PM |

    @Jonathan

    I don't know about the docs, but I can speak for myself and several of my RD colleagues that we are scared of liability and Big Brother.  A lot of us believe that there should not be an emphasis on "healthy" whole grains and that saturated fat is not the enemy, but we tend to follow "best practice" guidelines and provide "evidenced-based" recommendations for fear of losing our jobs.  The most frustrating part of all of it is that most of those "evidenced-based" recommendations come from pharmaceutical and agrigulturally funded research!!!

  • Anonymous

    9/22/2010 6:44:10 PM |

    How many people seeking medical advice just want a pill?  Brain washed, indentured wage slaves are loathe to change their diets or exercise much less budget, garden or cook their own food!  The problem(s) are HUGE and by design imo.  What a social experiment these corporations have wrought!

  • Tommy

    9/22/2010 6:58:25 PM |

    Before my heart attack last Oct. I was in great shape, I have never been overweight in my life and my cholesterol/triglycerides were all good.  I had a collapsed artery from some ruptured plaque and left the hospital with another 40-60% blockage in an artery at the bottom of my heart that they said they were leaving alone. Why did this happen when I was in what seemed like good health by the numbers? Who knows. I'm mystified.  I was given Plavix, Lopressor and Simvastatin. I stopped the plavix due to a reaction a few months down the road. I have now decided that when I see my cardiologist in December (I have a stress test scheduled) I will tell him to take me off the statin.
    My lab work a few weeks ago was Triglycerides/43, HD/46 and LDL 74.  I think it's my diet more than the statin and I also think the statin may be keeping my HDL down. It was 65 before my heart attack. I think I can do just as good and possibly get my HDL higher without the statin and also adding niacin.

  • Anonymous

    9/22/2010 7:46:42 PM |

    I heart another presumably valid reason why many doctors go directly to statins.  It was from a journalist (I can't remember what publication) but he had bad lipids, corrected them on his own with low carb, D, fish oil, etc.. and went back to his doctor and said, 'look see... it CAN be done with diet'.

    The doctor smiled knowingly and said, 'yes, I know it can be done.  I can advise 100/100 patients to do this and 2 years from now 99/100 will be right back where they started.  Or I can prescribe a statin and have a far better chance of improving their profile.'

    Most people don't care enough about their health to make the change on their own.

  • Kevin

    9/22/2010 8:27:02 PM |

    The sales reps are up to speed on all the newest medications.  They can rattle off statistics as to why one drug is better than another.  That's their job.  

    In my veterinary practice I can't keep up with the newest surgical techniques and medications.  The drug reps keep my practice from becoming dangerously out of step. And similar to what anonymous said, I can lecture clients on how to best feed their animals but 90% goes in one ear and out the other.

    kevin

    kevin

  • Anonymous

    9/22/2010 9:28:46 PM |

    Kevin,

    Speaking of pet diets, we took in a stray cat three years ago and tried everything to get him to stop attacking birds to no avail.  We went on a low carb diet and decided he should too.  He eats ground up chicken sold as pet food.  He is no longer tempted by birds - he prefers mice!

  • Anonymous

    9/23/2010 1:15:24 AM |

    I COULDN'T AGREE MORE. I AM A LIPIDOLOGIST AND    WAS TRAINED AND BRAINWASHED TO BE A HIGH END DRUG REP AND GET AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ON STATINS. THAT IS THE DIRTY SECRET OF THE NLA WHICH TRAINS LIPIDOLOGISTS WHICH IS REALLY A PUPPET ORGANIZATION BOUGT AND PAID FOR BY BIG PHARMA....AND THEY KNOW IT....WATCH THEM CHANGE THEIR NAME IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS ONCE STATINS GO OFF PATENT AND THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LIPID HYPOTHESIS BEING A COMPLETE FAILURE GETS OUT TO THE PUBLIC

  • Larry

    9/23/2010 2:09:46 AM |

    I can understand that the Drug companies have a huge influence.
    I can also see how many people would rather take a magic pill with their Big Mac and Fries.
    But... some of the Drug commercials on TV tonight mention Cancer as a possible side effect.
    I think it was for an RA drug ?
    I don't think I'd be willing to risk some form of Cancer as a trade-off for another illness.
    Others mention Suicidal potential.
    How can their CEO's sleep at night ?
    And not for nothing... but the Medical Community - Doctors,etc - have to know the harm being done also.

  • Steve

    9/23/2010 4:01:50 AM |

    I find the statin rants a little tiring; there are some of us out there who truly benefit from drug treatment where diet alone cannot get our lipid numbers in order.  I am of normal weight, exercise, eat no grains,sugar or cornstarch and without statins cannot get my NMR particle count below 1300 with 66% small particles.  Niacin not good due to eczema and seb dermatitis. With Statin and Zetia my particles are 609, BP, throid and D3 all normal( in line with Dr. Davis recommendations) and HDL is 59 with TRGS of 28. I clearly have an issue as TRGS were always low(no higher than 75) before elimination of grains,etc.  So, i am thankful for statins and my Lipidoligist

  • Fran

    9/23/2010 4:15:36 AM |

    Reply for: Anonymous said...
    I COULDN'T AGREE MORE...
    ...ONCE STATINS GO OFF PATENT AND THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LIPID HYPOTHESIS BEING A COMPLETE FAILURE GETS OUT TO THE PUBLIC

    The truth is "out there" but it keeps getting buried by the press and Big Pharma. I read emails from those damaged by statins every day. Their stories may be anecdotal, but it's what's happening in the real World and no one is listening. My husband has persistent cognitive decline, Parkinson's hand tremor, numerous nutritional deficiencies, heavy metal toxicity... all of which I feel were "triggered" (over time) by 8 years of statin drugs; 1st Zocor, then Lipitor. He continuously complained about muscle/joint - pain/stiffness only to be told, "You're getting older, what did you expect?" "Statins provide more benefit than any discomfort you are experiencing." At that time he was in his mid 50's. There was a long list of other side effects too: visual disturbances, unexplained anger, muscle atrophy, dark skin pigmentation, etc. The final incident was TGA (transient global amnesia). So almost 7 years after stopping statins we're still trying to improve his quality of life. The most unfortunate and frustrating thing is trying to find a doctor or doctors that 1st, understand that by simply stopping statins doesn't stop the damage and 2nd, trying to find someone to guide the patient and caregiver with HELP and not just more drugs to cover-up statin damage.
    There's a lot in the press lately that so many thousands of people will contract Alzheimer's in the next decade... well, I feel the 1st thing they should suspect is "statin drugs"... just do a search on "statins memory loss"... the evidence is OUT THERE.

  • medeldist

    9/23/2010 8:06:23 AM |

    Some pictures from the Stockholm EASD conferende on diabetes:

    http://www.kostdoktorn.se/big-business

    Big business indeed. Quite tragic...

  • Jonathan

    9/23/2010 2:11:17 PM |

    "there are some of us out there who truly benefit from drug"

    You have no idea if you will benefit from statins.  Yeah, it lowers your cholesterol.  It doesn't mean you'll not have a heart attack or not get cancer or not loose your mind.  The only benefit you are getting is peace of mind by skewing numbers that don't really have anything to do with heart disease.  Cholesterol doesn't cause heart disease, it is trying to repair the damage of what really is causing heart disease.

  • Apolloswabbie

    9/23/2010 2:11:24 PM |

    I think anon's point is a good one - as a fitness trainer I see folks who can and will change their diets to improve their health, the ones that won't go to see doctors.  The doctors don't believe the dietary change will help, for two reasons - it doesn't help if you recommend the USDA/ADA/AHA diets, and, 2, most of the folks they see don't want to change, they want a pill. A third reason is that even if a person changes their diet and gets healthy, once healthy, they revert to eating in the way that those they are around eat.  Eating is a social behavior.  It's a rare individual that can sustain the focus necessary to eat well in a world of mis-information and cheap, low quality food.

  • Apolloswabbie

    9/23/2010 2:25:14 PM |

    Thanks for your work, Dr. D, I feel like your posts are one of the most effective ways to communicate the significance of a smart approach to carbohydrate consumption.

  • Kent

    9/23/2010 3:09:46 PM |

    Tommy,

    Make sure to have your small LDL pattern and LP(a) checked.

  • Bill

    9/23/2010 4:02:51 PM |

    Dr. Davis I respect what you have said and the way you say it, but the worst result of prescribing statins isn't simply that people are not given the best options - the fact is people die as a result of taking statin drugs.

    Does anyone with any understanding of statins really believe that Lipitor or Zocor is any different than Baycol?

    Given that Baycol was taken off the market after numerous reports of deaths from rhabdomyolysis - it astounds me that there is still a restrained yet positive viewpoint towards them. It would benefit doctors to get a few facts straight and begin to dig deeper than a summary of studies on pharmaceuticals. Consider that 94% of the drug advertising claims are not supported by scientific evidence - BMJ 2004;328:485 (28 February) http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.extract

    Consider also that there are over 900 studies showing serious side effects of statin drugs and many other dangers related to their use:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/the-truth-about-statin-drugs-revealed.aspx

    Then get back to the heart of the issue for the "use of statins" - cholesterol lowering and consider the work of Uffe Ravnskov who decimated the idea:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/05/Does-High-Cholesterol-REALLY-Cause-Heart-Disease.aspx

    When it comes down to it Dr. Davis there are hundreds of thousands of victims of the medical communities "practice" of medicine and millions who owe their deaths or the death of their loved ones to the ignorance of the medical community to use available information and long ago written pieces on safer more effective methods of care for a patient - Max Gerson wrote on cancer cures back in the 50's and yet he is ridiculed by ignorant doctors who sell expensive non-cures to their cancer patients - these patients are numbered by the uncontested study of Gary Null, PhD and Carolyn Dean, M.D., et al - "Death By Medicine" http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm

    Kudos for being brave Dr. Davis - but a failure to recognize the damage done by medicine as practiced in America will result in an unwillingness to change - and cause the continued deaths of over 1 MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR AT THE HANDS OF MAINSTREAM MEDICINE - people following medical advice, in institutions - not on their own and not following medical advice.

  • Bill

    9/23/2010 4:03:26 PM |

    Dr. Davis I respect what you have said and the way you say it, but the worst result of prescribing statins isn't simply that people are not given the best options - the fact is people die as a result of taking statin drugs.

    Does anyone with any understanding of statins really believe that Lipitor or Zocor is any different than Baycol?

    Given that Baycol was taken off the market after numerous reports of deaths from rhabdomyolysis - it astounds me that there is still a restrained yet positive viewpoint towards them. It would benefit doctors to get a few facts straight and begin to dig deeper than a summary of studies on pharmaceuticals. Consider that 94% of the drug advertising claims are not supported by scientific evidence - BMJ 2004;328:485 (28 February) http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.extract

    Consider also that there are over 900 studies showing serious side effects of statin drugs and many other dangers related to their use:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/the-truth-about-statin-drugs-revealed.aspx

    Then get back to the heart of the issue for the "use of statins" - cholesterol lowering and consider the work of Uffe Ravnskov who decimated the idea:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/05/Does-High-Cholesterol-REALLY-Cause-Heart-Disease.aspx

    When it comes down to it Dr. Davis there are hundreds of thousands of victims of the medical communities "practice" of medicine and millions who owe their deaths or the death of their loved ones to the ignorance of the medical community to use available information and long ago written pieces on safer more effective methods of care for a patient - Max Gerson wrote on cancer cures back in the 50's and yet he is ridiculed by ignorant doctors who sell expensive non-cures to their cancer patients - these patients are numbered by the uncontested study of Gary Null, PhD and Carolyn Dean, M.D., et al - "Death By Medicine" http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm

    Kudos for being brave Dr. Davis - but a failure to recognize the damage done by medicine as practiced in America will result in an unwillingness to change - and cause the continued deaths of over 1 MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR AT THE HANDS OF MAINSTREAM MEDICINE - people following medical advice, in institutions - not on their own and not following medical advice.

  • Bill

    9/23/2010 4:03:48 PM |

    Dr. Davis I respect what you have said and the way you say it, but the worst result of prescribing statins isn't simply that people are not given the best options - the fact is people die as a result of taking statin drugs.

    Does anyone with any understanding of statins really believe that Lipitor or Zocor is any different than Baycol?

    Given that Baycol was taken off the market after numerous reports of deaths from rhabdomyolysis - it astounds me that there is still a restrained yet positive viewpoint towards them. It would benefit doctors to get a few facts straight and begin to dig deeper than a summary of studies on pharmaceuticals. Consider that 94% of the drug advertising claims are not supported by scientific evidence - BMJ 2004;328:485 (28 February) http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.extract

    Consider also that there are over 900 studies showing serious side effects of statin drugs and many other dangers related to their use:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/the-truth-about-statin-drugs-revealed.aspx

    Then get back to the heart of the issue for the "use of statins" - cholesterol lowering and consider the work of Uffe Ravnskov who decimated the idea:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/05/Does-High-Cholesterol-REALLY-Cause-Heart-Disease.aspx

    When it comes down to it Dr. Davis there are hundreds of thousands of victims of the medical communities "practice" of medicine and millions who owe their deaths or the death of their loved ones to the ignorance of the medical community to use available information and long ago written pieces on safer more effective methods of care for a patient - Max Gerson wrote on cancer cures back in the 50's and yet he is ridiculed by ignorant doctors who sell expensive non-cures to their cancer patients - these patients are numbered by the uncontested study of Gary Null, PhD and Carolyn Dean, M.D., et al - "Death By Medicine" http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm

    Kudos for being brave Dr. Davis - but a failure to recognize the damage done by medicine as practiced in America will result in an unwillingness to change - and cause the continued deaths of over 1 MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR AT THE HANDS OF MAINSTREAM MEDICINE - people following medical advice, in institutions - not on their own and not following medical advice.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/23/2010 10:22:51 PM |

    Anonymous lipidologist--

    I'd love to hear more about your perspective. Rarely do we hear directly from the "inside."

    I've suspected as much about the NLA, but wasn't sure. Judging by the prescribing habits of the lipidology community, I figured that "education" was slanted in this direction.

  • Martin Levac

    9/24/2010 1:47:06 AM |

    Maybe you have the same thinking pattern, Dr Davis. You speak of "inherited" yet continue with "dietary intervention". It's not inherited when the solution is to stop eating what causes it. It might have a genetic factor but only because our genes are not adapted to eating that crap. That trigs can go as high as 1000 mg merely shows that some have an extreme response to the same stimuli, not that their genes are somewhat less adapted to eating the same crap. The others who's trigs still go up but not as high aren't adapted either, they're just sturdier.

    It's like comparing strong vs weak. He's not strong because he's got good genes. He's strong because he lifted heavy weights for 10 years. The other guy just didn't bother to do that. Ergo, one guy can lift heavy weights today while the other can't lift the same heavy weights today. But back when they were both weak, neither could lift heavy weights.

    In the same line with diet and trigs. His trigs don't go high because of his genes. His trigs go that high because he's been eating more crap for longer than the other guy. But back when neither was eating so much crap, they had the same response amplitude to the same stimuli, i.e. they were both weak.

    I'm just saying.

  • Tommy

    9/24/2010 3:42:20 AM |

    So I have a family history of heart problems. My father had his first heart attack at age 49 and it was similar to mine in symptoms and artery. He wasn't eating a healthy diet as I was and he wasn't in the shape I was either as I kept myself fit. Yet I had my heart attack at age 52, just 3 years difference. Coincidence? Now my cardiologist says that I don't fall into the same guidelines as everyone else as far as cholesterol etc. Is this true? Does family history make me a special case? Diet and exercise didn't work for me the first time around.

  • Anonymous

    9/24/2010 3:01:31 PM |

    Dr. Davis I have been following your blog with interest as I am trying to combat high LDL as much as possible via diet (low carb)  and exercise.  I am female, age 48 with early menopause, hypertension under control with lisinopril, and TSH normal. My HDL averages 85, triglycerides average 45 (stable over 10 years), but my LDL particles have ranged from 1600 to 2000 over this last year, corresponding to LDL of 160 to 200.  LDL seems to go up on low carb for me, while my HDL and triglycerides are fine  with or without diet intervention.  The NMR indicates that I am highly insulin sensitive, with the type "A" profile. My endocronoligist has been willing to work with me regarding diet and exercise but we have seen little change, and he now thinks that I really need to go on a statin.  I just had my arterial wall thickness measured, which showed no signs of plaque or narrowing. My CRP has been elevated but is going down ( I am also recovering from plantar fascitis -- so it is not clear what is causal here), and I take 1 81 mg aspirin a day.  He has not pursued genetic testing, due to costs (other than lipo A which is fine), but believes that my high LDL is genetic.  My grandfather had a non-fatal heart attack, and both sides of the family have high cholesterol.   I will keep working at exercise (I need to take off 10 to ideally 20 pounds more).

    Would you please comment  more on the best diets for various genetic  causes for LDL?  Even within the low carb group there seem to be so many variations.  Are there situations where statins should be used in women?

    Thanks!

  • Jonathan

    9/24/2010 9:32:17 PM |

    @Anonymous LDL
    You're numbers look good.  Stop worrying about the LDL so much.
    Looks like you are following a good diet as long as you are avoiding veg oils.  I highly suggest reading some cholesterol books like the one by Uffe Ravnskov.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/27/2010 11:56:05 AM |

    Anonymous with lipoproteins--

    Allow me to make one point: Calculated LDL will often misleadingly go up with a low-carbohydrate diet. This is GOOD.

    It means that LDL size is increasing. But it provides the false impression of an increasing calculated LDL. That's why a repeat measure by NMR LDL particle number or apoprotein B is required.

  • Anonymous

    9/27/2010 7:59:32 PM |

    I agree that not enough doctors think deeply enough about what they are doing.

    Reminds me of the old saying, 'Whenever you see a doctor lost in thought its usually because he's in unfamiliar territory'

  • Laura

    9/29/2010 6:37:17 PM |

    Great comments.

  • Anonymous

    9/30/2010 3:44:08 PM |

    NPA is most definitely a front for the drug companies.  I've attended many of there scientific meetings and most of what I hear is brainwashing at it's best.  I once had a discusstion with the group head and told him how I felt about their pro-statin bias and he couldn't even fathom where I was coming from he was in so deep.  When I presented my concerns about low LDL and cancer, he actually spouted off some industry funded research indicating that statins actually lowered cancer risk.  Unbelievable....

  • Paleo Power

    10/10/2010 2:22:03 AM |

    It's easy to be an unwitting puppet when it's making you lots and lots of cash.

    Hell I'd even do it if I didn't have morals.

Loading