Can I stop my Coumadin?

Here I go again.

While I will try to keep this blog on topic, i.e., coronary heart disease prevention and reversal using nutritional and other natural strategies, I believe that a "critical mass" of frequently asked, though off topic, questions keep cropping up.

One such question revolves around Coumadin, or warfarin.

Somehow, my Nattokinase scam blog post draws traffic about Coumadin. I tried to make the point that a conventional blood thinning agent like Coumadin that undoubtedly has undesirable side-effects cannot be replaced by an agent that has an uncertain track record. In the case of nattokinase, no track record.

To illustrate how far wrong the "nattokinase as replacement for Coumadin" idea can go, here is a question from Anna:


I came across your blog while perusing.

I am a bit bummed because I have been on Coumadin (warfarin) for around 22 years since I was 6 years old. I have a mechanical heart valve (St. Jude's), as I have heart-related issues, including hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Well, it is just that the warfarin seems to interact with nearly everything. I feel like I can not get the nutrients my body requires. I desire to consume more raw foods and vegan foods, though I do not want anything to damage my heart valve or risk a stroke/heart attack or internal bleeding.

I have been underweight the majority of my life, malnourished , currently am still somewhat underweight, though enjoying food again, as I had what mimicked Crohn's Disease for several years (horrendous pain), from which I am in remission now. I was diagnosed with osteoporosis, which may or may not be caused from consuming warfarin.

Is it possible to get off of warfarin and effectively keep my blood thinned ? I currently take 1.5 mg to 2 mg dosage. Does the warfarin destroy Vitamin K and if so does that mean while on warfarin I never get the Vitamin K nutrients even if I did consume foods with it in it?

Thank you
Anna


No, sorry, Anna. Stopping Coumadin with your unique issues, i.e., a prosthetic mechanical heart valve (likely mitral, judging by your history of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, in which the patterns of blood flow ejected from the heart disrupt the natural mitral valve function) and cardiomyopathy, can be fatal. Without blood thinning, the mechanical heart valve can trigger blood clot formation, since it is a foreign object implanted into the bloodstream.

There are no natural alternatives available with track records confident enough to bet your life on. Aspirin nor Plavix are blood thinners, but platelet inhibitors. These two agents, while they work for other forms of arterial (but not venous) blood clot inhibition, will not work for your unique situation.

Likewise, a purported oral lytic agent like nattokinase should not be substituted for Coumadin. Even if there was plausible science behind it, you should demand substantial evidence that it provides at least blood thinning equivalent to Coumadin. Should a blood clot, even a small one, form in or around the prosthetic valve, the valve can stop working within seconds. This can lead to death within minutes.

I believe it would be foolhardy to bet your life based on the marketing--let me repeat: MARKETING--of a "nutritional supplement" by supplement manufacturers eager to make a buck.

Nor are there any other nutritional supplements that can safely replace the Coumadin. I wish that were NOT true, as I am no stranger to the long-term dangers of Coumadin and I am a big believer, in general, in nutritional supplements. I am a BIGGER believer, however, in the truth. Weighing the options available to us today, there really is no rational choice but to remain on Coumadin.

By the way, I tell my patients to eat a substantial amount of green vegetables while they take Coumadin. I know that conventional advice is to reduce or eliminate green vegetables due to their content of Coumadin-antagonizing vitamin K. I think this is wrong, also. Green vegetables are the best foods on earth. They reduce risk for cancer, diabetes, bone disease, and coronary heart disease.

To obtain the benefits of green vegetables without mucking up your blood thinning (your "protime" or International Normalized Ratio, INR), I advise my patients who take Coumadin to eat green vegetables--but do so every day in relatively consistent quantities, so that the protime or INR is not disrupted and remains reasonably constant. It may mean that your total dose of Coumadin may be somewhat higher, e.g., 3 or 4 mg instead of 2 mg, but the dose is immaterial outside of blood thinning. That way, you obtain all the wonderful health benefits of green vegetables while maintaining fairly consistent blood thinning/protime/INR. Coumadin does not block all the health benefits of vegetables, only those related to vitamins K1 and K2.

With regards to protecting yourself from the osteoporosis promoting effects of Coumadin, I would be sure to follow a program of natural bone health, such as the one I discussed in Homegrown osteoporosis prevention and reversal. You will have to be extra careful, however, with the vitamin K2. Ideally, you have a doctor knowledgeable about vitamin K2 who can assist you in managing K2 intake while on Coumadin. This is something you can definitely NOT manage on your own. (I am a big believer in self-managed care, but this is way beyond the limit.)

Lastly, it is my belief that anyone with an inflammatory bowel condition, such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, should absolutely, positively, and meticulously AVOID WHEAT and all other gluten sources (such as rye, barley, and oats). Even if you test negative for celiac markers (e.g., anti-gliadin antibodies, emdomysium and transglutaminase antibodies), the enhanced intestinal permeability will allow wheat proteins, such as gluten, to gain ready entry into the bloodstream. Not to mention that wheat should have no place in the human diet anyway, in my view.

Comments (20) -

  • Myron

    9/5/2010 7:09:35 AM |

    Coumadin is considered a Natural Medicine having been derived from mold acting on Sweet Clover.

    Most Pharmaceutical Drugs have a Natural Basis.

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 8:32:30 AM |

    What about using heparin derivatives as a replacement of Marevan / Coumarin?

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 8:38:52 AM |

    As mentioned in Wikipedia, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is used in pregnancy. It should be possible to change Marevan / Coumarin with LMWH.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marevan#Pregnancy

    Heparin can not be taken orally, so you have to get injections if you decide to change medication.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/5/2010 9:54:16 AM |

    Yes, indeed.

    But anyone who has taken low-molecular weight heparin injections will tell you it's no picnic. The injections can be painful and leave a bruise. After a few weeks, you can feel like a pincushion and be riddled with bruises. Not a happy alternative.

  • Chris Masterjohn

    9/5/2010 4:56:00 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis,

    Great, although somewhat depressing, post.

    What is the point of taking the K2 when K2 interferes with the therapy (as Vermeer's group showed) and the dose will have to be adjusted?  The drug interferes with the recycling of vitamin K so it should affect both forms equally.  Are you hoping it may shift the balance of residual vitamin K activity towards the bones and blood vessels?  That seems to make some sense if there is substantial residual vitamin K activity.

    Chris

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 6:13:38 PM |

    Chris, I think you are going down the right path with your thinking.  Some K2 survives warfarin therapy as evidenced here:


    "In conclusion, our study indicates that in a rat model
    arterial media calcification is prevented by a high dose of
    MK-4."

    http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowPDF&ProduktNr=224160&Ausgabe=229786&ArtikelNr=75344

    The question then becomes how high a dose is therapeutic in humans and can you get it from diet alone?

    I'm a prisoner of life long warfarin therapy and have consciously shifted my K intake to K2 by eating lots of eggs, cheese and grass fed/finished beef instead of green leafy vegetables because of the way warfarin hammers conversion of K1 to K2.  Sure green leafy vegetables have health properties but they won't help with warfarin driven arterial calcification and osteoporosis.  So far I have avoided taking a K2 supplement and adjusting warfarin dosage because I don't have confidence in the consistency of the K2 in a supplement form.  It becomes another wildcard.  But the bottom line is I really don't know if there is enough K2 to make a difference from food alone.

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 6:19:24 PM |

    Dr. Davis, do you have any thoughts on arginine supplementation as a driver of nitric oxide production for the purpose of blood vessel dilation?  I am showing signs of venous insufficiency from a blood clot in my leg suffered over a decade ago.  You mention aspirin and Plavix as platelet inhibitors that don't impact venous clotting.  Arginine also affects platelet activity and I can't find anything definitive about whether or not that is an issue with warfarin.  Arginine is also associated with mitigating atherosclerosis which would seem to make it a good choice for people on warfarin.

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 8:04:38 PM |

    Dr davis

    after reading your blog two things have stuck in my mind. one about the role of vaccines in development of disease. and two role of GM foods in destroying health.

    kindly shed light on it. im splitting my hair over it

    Smile

  • Anonymous

    9/5/2010 8:37:04 PM |

    This topic has to be of great interest to the many people on Warfarin for atrial fibrillation,  particularly the issue of warfarin-induced calcification and osteoporosis.  This article http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/109/8/3607 suggests that levels of 45mcg of K2 supplementation would be safe, but what is a therapeutic dose and how does it work with Warfarin? (One of the authors has ties with Natto Pharma, seller of K2; they also suggest it is a safe dose.) Until specific studies are done, we will not know how it works.

    Will one of the newer anticoagulants in the pipeline, such as Dabigatran, which I understand is not a vitamin K agonist, be approved soon and will it be effective?

  • Anonymous

    9/6/2010 3:16:19 PM |

    Dear Dr. Davis:

    This topic is really distressing.  My father has been on Warfarin for 10 years due to atrial fib. I can't help but wonder if his increasingly worsening calcium scores were due in part to Warfarin. It seems to be an extremely nasty - but necessary - drug.

    Over the past year he has been increasingly tired and two months ago had a triple bypass. He has been on a low carb diet, lost 25lbs and started taking fish oil and 5,000 i.u Vitamin D3. He is not taking any K2, but he does eat green vegetables every day. He recently started taking 10,000 i.u. of D3.  Should anyone taking larger D3 doses who is also on Warfarin be worried about arterial calcification? How does one find a doctor in Milw. or elsewhere who has knowledge about K2 and Warfarin? What else can Warfarin users do about their heart disease?

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/7/2010 1:45:50 AM |

    Sadly, there are no data--none, zero, zip--that address the end result of taking vit K2 in any dose or any form while on warfarin.

    No doubt: It will drive INR down, driving warfarin need up. But there are no data on what effects will result at the bone or artery level.

    I wish that weren't true, but we cannot invent data where it doesn't exist. It also cannot be extrapolated from existing data or experiences without incurring substantial risk.

    Sometimes, we just need the data.

  • Anand Srivastava

    9/7/2010 7:14:21 AM |

    How does Omega3 supplementation help?
    I have read that Omega6 is one of the agents that triggers blood clotting.
    Also I read that coumadin actually works by inhibiting action of K1/K2.
    So adding K1/K2 will actually be against the coumadin therapy.

    But since Omega6 is required for the signalling that causes blood clots. If you reduce the Omega6 and increase the Omega3 then the blood clots should not happen naturally.
    It will be like the Inuits.
    Their arteries are in a bad shape but they never get a heart problem, because they do not get blood clots in their blood.
    The only problem is that they don't get blood clots while bleeding also.
    So if you use excess Omega3 with very little Omega6 you will be doing the same. But the side effect is that you have to be careful about bleeds.
    I would think that the same problem will be there for coumadin

  • Anonymous

    9/7/2010 5:20:15 PM |

    Dear Dr. Davis:

    The FDA Advisory Council is meeting regarding Dabigatran on September 20th and word is that its approval is expected by the end of the year or early 2011. I have even seen Boehringer-Ingelheim ads on the online JACC to the effect of "Coming Soon - Pradaxa" (the brand name).

    Will this be the paradigm-shifting Warfarin alternative for AF patients?  As Dabigatran is not a Vitamin K agonist, will its users be able to also use food and supplemental sources of Vitamin K2?

    Apart from the supposed reduction in bleeding risk, will Dabigatran be a preferable anticoagulant for long-term Warfarin users?

  • Chris Masterjohn

    9/8/2010 7:07:28 PM |

    Dear Dr. Davis,

    Did you mean that there are no data on whether K2 will protect against the heart valve calcification that occurs on these drugs, or that there are no data showing its effect on INR?

    Vermeer's group compared vitamin K2 as MK-7 to K1 and showed that it is much more potent at driving down the INR value:

    http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/109/8/3279

    By the way, since you are a fan of K2, if you haven't already seen it, you might enjoy the large review I wrote on it back in 2007, which argued that it was the "Activator X" discovered by Weston Price:

    http://www.westonaprice.org/abcs-of-nutrition/175-x-factor-is-vitamin-k2.html

    Love your blog!

    Chris

  • Chris Masterjohn

    9/8/2010 7:12:27 PM |

    Anonymous, I have seen that study but I don't think it shows how much residual activity of K2 there is, or to what extent it can protect against calcification for someone on warfarin.

    The reason is that K2 potently interferes with these drugs.  In the study, they used a massive dose without cranking up the warfarin proportionately.  However, if you take K2 and you actually need to be on these drugs, your doctor will have to adjust the dose of the drug according to the dose of K2 you are taking.  So it is not very apparent that it is actually possible to obtain the beneficial effects of K2 while taking these drugs.

    (As a side point, the massive dose of K2 could provide enough K2 in these studies to allow each molecule to act once and then get converted to the epoxide form without being recycled, and actually exert a meaningful effect.  Off memory, I don't remember whether they did calculations to show whether there was residual reductase activity (i.e. activity of the enzyme that recycles vitamin K, which is the target of warfarin), but the principle that high dose K2 protects against calcification does not show that the dose of warfarin used allowed residual activity of the enzyme, necessariliy.)

    Chris

  • Anonymous

    9/8/2010 9:03:01 PM |

    Sounds as if AF patients should ask their physicians to change them to Dabigatran as soon as it comes out. Less bleeding risk, no constant monitoring and, importantly, the ability to avail oneself of good nutrition without worrying about INR's. The British Heart Foundation is campaigning for the drug to replace Warfarin.  

    Used widely to get rid of rat infestations in post-Katrina New Orleans, maybe Warfarin will soon be relegated to only killing rats.

  • Chris Masterjohn

    9/8/2010 10:10:20 PM |

    Anonymous,

    Good points -- warfarin was actually developed specifically as a rat poison, so if it came back into fashion post-Katrina, that's nothing new.

    Chris

  • Lacie

    9/10/2010 10:21:24 PM |

    I spent 18 unhappy months on Warfarin after a DVT/pulmonary embolism episode due to oral contraceptive use (I have Factor V leiden).  Happily, my physician took me off blood thinners last year after a doppler scan to confirm all of my clots were gone.

    If you really need a blood thinner (artificial heart valve, active blood clot, severe prolonged a-fib, homozygous Factor V leiden), there's just no good alternative to Warfarin at the moment.  Several alternatives have been tested and rejected due to severe side effects.

    A lower-risk propensity to blood clotting (hterozygous Factor V leiden, mild, short-duration a-fib, etc.) might respond to vitamin E.  I started taking it while on Warfarin and my INR readings shot up from 2 to 4.5.  See study by Harvard researcher Robert Glynn, published in September 25, 2007, issue of Circulation journal

  • Holistic health Blog

    6/29/2011 1:07:21 PM |

    Surely the answer is to take the nattokinase, keep a close watch on the INR & if it goes up significantly titrate the warfarin down.

  • Sal P

    5/15/2013 6:40:08 PM |

    Hello Doc,

    I have the same conflict as many here. I take Coumadin for my mechanical heart valve but I do eat green veggies such as broccoli, spinach, or a small salad everyday. I also take Omega 3 daily. My PT INR is usually around the required goal of 2.0. As long as I have this consistent INR reading, is it safe to continue to to have all the above mentioned in my body? I am hoping that my Coumadin dosage can be lowered with the same INR results.

    Please Advise

Loading
Drug industry "Deep Throat"

Drug industry "Deep Throat"

A Heart Scan Blog reader brought the following letter from a former pharmaceutical sales representative to congress to my attention.

Interesting excerpts:

As a former drug representative for Eli Lilly, I spent 20 months increasing the market share of my company’s drugs. I was recruited fresh from college with an eager desire to employ my degree in molecular biology and biochemistry. Shortly after my hiring, it became clearly apparent that a drug sale had much more to do with establishing personal relationships than it did with understanding the latest science. However, any doubts I held regarding the effectiveness of such methods were dispelled by the results of my persuasiveness and the financial rewards I received for my efforts. The latter also helped me rationalize the many ethically dubious situations I routinely encountered in my work. Upon my departure from the industry, I began working for the public’s health. Seven years later, as a result of my experiences and education I am more convinced than ever that the goals of the pharmaceutical industry often stand in direct conflict with the practice of ethical and responsible medicine. Nothing in my recent research causes me to believe that my experiences were anything but typical of the training and practice of the majority of drug reps plying their trade today.


“There’s a big bucket of money sitting in every [doctor’s] office.” – Michael Zubillaga, Astra Zeneca Regional Sales Director, Oncology


The majority of drug reps entering the work force today are young and attractive. The ranks of reps are replete with sexual icons: former cheerleaders, ex-military, models, athletes. Of course, as a sales job, the reps must be eloquent and convincing. Depending on the population, certain ethnicities are preferred either to make the rep distinct among other reps or to provide them with a cultural advantage in connecting with their clients. Noticeably lacking among most new reps is any significant scientific understanding. My personal case illustrates this point rather vividly: In my training class for Eli Lilly's elite neuroscience division, selling two products that constituted over 50% of the company's profits at the time, none of my 21 classmates nor our two trainers had any college level scientific education. In fact, that first day of training, I taught my class and my instructors the very basic but crucial process by which two nerve cells communicate with one another. It is very likely that the majority of my class couldn't explain the difference between a neuron and a neutron prior to sales school. While it's certainly a bonus to have a scientifically educated representative, it is far from a primary recruitment criterion. Youth is a much higher criterion for the sales position.

Sales representative trainers are almost always veteran sales representatives and consequently, much of the training they offer is implicit in the anecdotes they give. This informal training parallels the standard training offered by the industry and in many ways compliments it. It is tacitly accepted by management and perceived as the "real" training by many veteran sale representatives. Among the more dubious "unofficial" lessons a new rep learns are: how to manipulate an expense report to exceed the spending limit for important clients, how to use free samples to leverage sales, how to use friendship to foster an implied "quid pro quo" relationship, the importance of sexual tension, and how to maneuver yourself to becoming a necessity to an office or clinic.

The most troubling aspect of pharmaceutical sales is systematic befriending of our clients. In addition to the psychological profiling mentioned above, drug reps are taught to constantly be on the lookout for personal effects that will help us connect to our doctors. When entering an office for the first time, we nonchalantly survey it for clues to ingratiate ourselves with our client. Similarly, conversations are intentionally steered into the realm of personal details such as religion, family, or hobbies to acquire similar information. As a matter of training, we collect this data subtly. In the course of a conversation with clients, we may glean facts about their prescribing preferences, the dates of their children’s birthdays, where they were born, or what music they enjoy. Training encourages us to commit these details to memory just long enough to return to our cars and instantly type up a “call report” listing the details of our conversation. On a daily basis, we connect our computers to a central database that uploads the information we’ve acquired, allowing us to share it with our partner drug reps and company marketers. Subsequently, drug reps interweave pieces of conversation specifically tailored to appeal to their client drawn from personal information that wasn’t necessarily shared with them. For example, Dr. Jones will be nothing but grateful when I supply him with a cake celebrating his children’s birthday when, in fact, he told my partner (and not me) the birthdates several months prior in a personal conversation.


The writer's comments ring true: The relentless attention-grab of sales representatives, using clever tactics that include access to detailed records of physician prescribing habits, big smiles and eye-winking, are detailed perfectly.

There's nothing wrong with a business doing its job by marketing its products and services. What is so wrong about this picture is that one side is so well-equipped, heavily funded, with access to extraordinary resources that the other side (physicians) don't have. And the physicians aren't the victims--YOU are.

A middle-aged, receding hairline physician, faced with a 28-year old attractive woman asking all manner of ingratiating questions but knowing full well what she is doing, having strategized for weeks on how to manipulate the behavior of her "mark," is helpless.

Like the mortgage-backed security crisis, we've reached another phenomenon of crisis proportions. Direct-to-consumer drug advertising, drugs for non-conditions and well people, pinpoint marketing of drugs to physicians--it's all gone too far.

Personally, drug representatives are not welcome in my office. This generally prompts puzzled, followed by angry, looks from the representatives, often traveling with a district supervisor hoping to help polish their pitch. If patients didn't request free samples, the reps would not step foot in the office.

Comments (16) -

  • Anonymous

    6/18/2009 1:53:18 PM |

    It sounds like doctors need salesmen/women residence training!

    I used to be a purchaser for our family company and later a large multi-national food firm and what is written here rings true with my experience too.  Most of the sales people were young ladies, that would come to my office, asking all kinds of personal questions, wanting to get to know me better, taking me to meals, concerts, sometimes just calling me up to chat.  

    You have to realize that she/he is doing their job.  And you need to realize what your job is, which in my case was doing best for the company.  I suppose fortunately for me, my father was a salesman.  I had an idea of how the sales pitch works.  

    I wish more doctors thought as you do.  As you mention, as a patient I don't buy from the drug company reps.  I purchase what the doctor recommends.  That is where the buck should stop.

  • John

    6/18/2009 1:55:01 PM |

    I know this to be true, since I know a very beautiful young RN that got out of nursing to be a pharmaceutical rep.  She later got back in to nursing, when one of her clients (a Dr. at a medical spa) made her an offer she couldn't refuse!  She didn't stay with that job even a year though.  I'm sure you guess by that she is back in the pharmaceutical business!

    She told me that in my town of about 50 doctors, that only a couple of them would allow the reps to stop in.  Most of the doctors here are like you and do not welcome the reps.

    You can always tell which doctors go for this, because they will have a room full of samples and every kind of prescription drug poster imaginable hanging thoughout the office, especially in the exam rooms!

    As a patient, I find it really annoying to see almost as many reps waiting to see the Dr. as their are patients!  

    Everyone I know assumes that the doctors who welcome the reps do get something in return, and probably more than just a birthday cake.  I'm thinking free vacations for prescribing certain drugs.  

    Could that be possible?  No one will ever talk about the "benefits" a doctor receives for welcoming in the reps, but it sure would be interesting to know.

    Thanks for he very interesting "deep throat" post!

  • Get Primal

    6/18/2009 2:14:16 PM |

    Dr. Davis,

    I enjoy your blog very much, but there are a couple issues I'd like to follow up on.  Full disclosure, I am a medical device sales rep.

    The first issue is regarding a post a couple weeks ago regarding the greed of medical device companies.  You referenced the initial price of drug eluting stents versus the prices today.  There isn't an industry in the world that doesn't price their hot new technology at a premium.  As other competitors come to market the prices obviously come down due to the competitive matrix.  How much did your flat screen TV cost when it first came out versus what it could be purchased for today?  How about calculators?  Or anything else?  You can argue that we're talking about something much more important than TV's, and we are, but these corporations are not set up to help hospitals remain profitable.  They are responsible to their shareholders first and foremost.  Quoting the price per gram of stainless steel stents is clever (and I enjoyed seeing the numbers), but it doesn't even come close to telling the true story.  Do you have any idea how much money it takes to bring one of these stents to market?  Once it gets to market do you have any idea how much it costs to pay a massive team to support it?  I cannot speak for the pharmaceutical industry and reps as I do not work in that sector, but the medical device reps are a critical part of the equation and are a major cost to an organization.

    The other issue, which I found more entertaining than irritating, was regarding the helpless middle aged doctors.  Are you telling me than a balding, middle aged doctor should be expected to simply melt in front of an attractive 28 year old drug rep?  I would immediately lose all respect for one that did.

    Thanks for letting me vent, keep up the great work on the blog!

  • kris

    6/18/2009 3:02:15 PM |

    LoL, Dr Davis, come on, now don't be too hard on 28 years old good looking women?
    there must be a study out there which would show that having good looking people around you (male or female (LOL)) creates a competitive environment to look better which partly leads to paying attention to his or her's own body  which ultimately (hopefully)will lead to a gym close by?
    (although i got your point)
    No wonder the heading "Deep Throat" and the look of the Drug rep came in the same article.
    But point well taken. i will be smiling for years to come when  ever i hear from some body that they are Drug reps specially the good looking ones.
    i read some where that humor is the best medicine (although you have touched a real issue out there which is effecting all of our lives big time).

  • kris

    6/18/2009 3:12:11 PM |

    LoL
    Now come on Dr. davis, dont be too hard on the 28 years old good looking people? there must be study out there to prove that having good looking people around creates a competitive environment and leads one to pay attention to their own body which  ultimately (hopefully) leads them to a nearest GYM.
    (Although i got your point)
    No wonder the the line "Deep Throat" and "28 year old good looking" "hair line Doc" came in the same article but only a thyroid corrective human can put together all the pieces of a puzzle together.
    i believe in that above all, humor is the best medicine and this article will put smile on my face for years to come, when ever i see a good looking Rep.
    (you have touched an issue which is effecting all of us big time our health and our pockets, well done)

  • Charles R.

    6/18/2009 3:38:17 PM |

    Dr. Davis, I love your blog, and find your ideas an approach incredibly useful, and I despise the tactics of Big Pharma, but your conclusions here seem pretty ridiculous.

    Saying that a physician is "helpless" in the face of a good 28-year-old female salesperson is just silly. everything this letter describes is just Sales 101, and is the kind of thing taught in many industries to their salespeople.

    Any doctor succumbing to these kinds of tactics is choosing to do so, and is fully responsible for his/her actions. I have known a lot of physicians, and few of them struck me as being shrinking violets. In fact they were often pretty arrogant and quite convinced of their own superior knowledge. At least around patients.

    If a physician doesn't ask the hard questions, or can't say "No" to manipulative tactics, then all the responsibility is the physician's, not the big, bad salespeople. Physicians are far from helpless, given their extensive education, experience, and positions.

    Many people in many professions have to deal with skilled salespeople in their work, and many manage to act responsibly. "The devil made me do it" isn't an excuse.

  • shel

    6/18/2009 6:18:34 PM |

    your blog is getting better all the time. you have a unique angle as a doctor within the mainstream, speaking out against mainstream activities.

    keep this up and you'll be famous.

  • Anonymous

    6/18/2009 7:19:14 PM |

    We also do not see drug reps in our office.

    We do not accept samples and (even before it became illegal) we've never accepted non-educational paraphernalia (clocks, facial tissue, paper clip holders, etc).

    Occasionally pens would make it into circulation at our office, but we would put them in the back, not for patient use, but for staff use.

    We prescribe generics meds whenever possible. We do not carry samples because it adds an unnecessary dimension to the decision making process for the provider; patients are less likely to actually fill their prescription; if they fill it, they're less likely to remain on it due to the increased copay and it would be expensive to administer samples due to the increased workload it creates for support staff (especially patient phone calls inquiring about needing more samples "until they can get their RX filled").

    I worked with a local GI office during a technology upgrade, and in ONE day over a 30 min period during lunch, the doc had to come up from the GI lab to sign the necessary paperwork from FOUR drug reps so that his staff could get lunch (that he didn't even get to enjoy) and so they could leave samples.

    There were FOUR drug reps in the breakroom, standing around waiting for the doc to finish his last scope. FOUR. I went into the breakroom (unaware of what I was about to walk into) to grab a drink and HOLY COW was it intimidating. Four nice looking, well dressed and social 20-somethings waiting around for the doctor.

    They asked who I was (they know EVERYONE in the office, so being an outsider, I was like fresh meat to them I guess!) and I opened with, "I work at another doctors office, but we don't see drug reps, so I'm not used to being ambushed while taking a break! I feel like a celebrity! You'll have to forgive me *smile*"

    They laughed and then proceeded to question why we don't allow reps.

    I explained the aforementioned reasons and one person asked, "how do your patients who don't have much money afford care without free samples?"

    Simple: "We're a family practice office that is open every day of the year. Every Saturday. Every Sunday. Every Holiday. Patients can see us every day of the year and pay their $10 copay rather than incurring the cost of an ER visit. With the money that saves them, they can afford the generic medications we most often prescribe."

    It was quick end to a slightly uncomfortable conversation!

    -JL

  • kris

    6/18/2009 9:19:09 PM |

    i was hopping the you do that. thanks

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/18/2009 9:55:15 PM |

    I believe that the drug reps intentionally prey on vanity--they appeal to the doctor's need to show their knowledge, the need to exert their "alpha male" dominance. And it works.

    Such is human weakness.

  • Ganesh Kumar

    6/19/2009 3:53:53 AM |

    I think Dr Davis is right! I knew pretty women being hired by Citibank worldwide as "Relationship Managers" to get customers to fork out monies on various bank schemes and mutual funds...did not realize this has penetrated even the drug industry! Possibly due to same "string of owners" owning both industry? Just a food for thought!

  • Anonymous

    6/19/2009 5:54:34 AM |

    Although an exaggeration (somewhat) here is a humorous take on this topic from the daily show:

    Dr. Spin, Medicine Woman

    Thanks to Cristin Duren, pharmaceutical rep and Miss Florida 2006, Dan's now on Lipitor, Zyrtec, Nexium, Celebrex and Wellbutrin; also, he's had an erection for over 96 hours.

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=117138&title=Dr.-Spin,-Medicine-Woman

  • Lee

    6/19/2009 9:31:53 AM |

    My brother used to be a pacemaker sales rep. These reps are usually made more welcome, since they help administer the devices and there are differences between companies' offerings which need explanation. Even so, he said the industry is based on bribery. The bribes are usually offered in the form of paid trips to conferences or sporting events.

    He said some doctors only accept trips to events that they consider professionally legitimate and do not intend to reward the salesman. But the salesman is not disappointed; he knows that he has still caught his fish. It is impossible for the doctor not to feel grateful. Sooner or later, the doctor will give the company's product a trial.

  • Sifter

    6/19/2009 6:35:09 PM |

    C'mon, you never bought a piece of jewerly from that hottie behind the counter? Sex appeal works, for all business, why should Big Pharma be any different?

    I generally agree with most of your criticisms.... my dad is a retired pharmacist, he'd be the first to denounce the bad antics and overpricing of meds, but that's the way it is.

    By the way, my doctor buddy in Glenview used to get cute reps taking him out Friday nights to get his name put on microbrewed beers, not to mention the $300 'dinners' at Hugo's Frog Bar for taking a 1 hour 'interview.'  Better to expose the side effects of Lipitor, etc then to bust some 28 year old for trying to make a living.

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/20/2009 12:30:49 AM |

    Sifter--

    You "c'mon":

    This sounds much like the testimony offered by tobacco industry representatives when asked why they continued to promote cigarette smoking when they had crystal-clear data implicating cancer causation: "Well, I had to pay my mortgage!"

    The ends do NOT justify the means. In my experience, drug industry representatives are a self-serving, money-grubbing lot out to advance their own careers. If they have to sell their souls and compromise their conscience and the health of other people . . .well, the truth be damned.

    I don't buy it.

  • Anonymous

    6/20/2009 3:54:15 AM |

    This excerpt is so true.  I was just on a vacation and met a really attractive young couple who sell pharma.  She was a model and he is former military, just like the article said. LOL

Loading