One hour blood sugar: Key to carbohydrate control and reversing diabetes

Diabetics are instructed to monitor blood glucose first thing in the morning and two hours after eating. This helps determine whether blood sugar is controlled with medications like metformin, Januvia, Byetta injections, or insulin.

But that's not how you use blood sugar to use to prevent or reverse diabetes. Two-hour blood sugars are also of no help in deciding whether you have halted glycation, or glucose modification of proteins the process that leads to cataracts, brittle cartilage and arthritis, oxidation of small LDL particles, atherosclerosis, kidney disease, etc.

So the key is to check one-hour after-eating (postprandial) blood sugars, a time when blood glucose peaks after consumption of carbohydrates. (It may peak somewhat sooner or later, depending on factors such as how much fluid was in the meal; protein, fat, and fiber content; presence of foods like vinegar that slow gastric emptying; the form of carbohydrate such as amylopectin A vs. amylopectin B, amylose, fructose, along with other factors. Once in a while, you might consider constructing your own postprandial glucose curve by doing fingersticks every 15 minutes to determine when your peak occurs.)

I reject the insane notion that after-eating blood sugars of less than 200 mg/dl are acceptable, the value accepted widely as the cutoff for health. Blood sugars this high occurring with any regularity ensure cataracts, arthritis, and all the other consequences of cumulative glycation. I therefore aim to keep one-hour after-eating glucoses 100 mg/dl or less. If you start in a pre-diabetic or diabetic range of, say, 120 mg/dl, then I advise people to not allow blood glucose to go any higher. A pre-meal blood glucose of 120 mg/dl would therefore be followed by an after-eating blood glucose of no higher than 120 mg/dl.

No doubt: This is strict. But people who do this:

--Lose weight from visceral fat
--Heighten insulin sensitivity
--Drop blood pressure
--Drop HbA1c and fasting glucose over time
--Reduce small LDL and other carbohydrate-sensitive measures

By the way, if you inadvertently trigger a high blood sugar like I did when I took my kids to the all-you-can-eat Indian buffet, go for a walk, bike, or burn the sugar off with a 30-minute or longer physical effort. Check your blood sugar again and it should be back in desirable range. But then learn from your lesson: Eliminate or reduce portion size of the culprit carbohydrate food.

Comments (27) -

  • Might-o'chonri-AL

    8/2/2011 6:11:40 AM |

    Glyco-sylation occurs inside a cell's endoplasmic reticulum lumen when certain  carbohydrates  (in the form of N-linked oligo-saccharides) meld with a newly folded protein that gets translated into  a glyco-protein.  There are different rates of activation and de-activation  between glyco-sylated and un-glycosylated proteins; this affects how that protein migrates as it tries to perform it's job and how  glycation can induce degenerative states.  Tissue cells with endoplasmic reticulum stress can exasperate certain disease progression because such "stress" there promotes more glycosylation.

  • Annabel

    8/2/2011 12:40:42 PM |

    I couldn't agree more with the advice to test every 15 minutes as a means of discovering your own "sugar curve." When I tried this, I found that my own peak falls pretty consistently at 75 minutes after beginning a meal. Testing at 2 hours completely overlooks my highest blood glucose levels.

    It's a particularly good technique for those folks whose A1c levels are higher than their fingersticks would predict...it's almost surely because they're doing their sticks way past their glucose peak.

    When test strips cost up to a buck apiece, it may feel hard to justify using six or eight of them on a single meal--but what you learn may save tens of thousands in medical bills!

  • Curt

    8/2/2011 1:31:12 PM |

    Another great article - thank you! I'm curious about your thoughts on controlled 1 hour blood sugars (mine are rarely over 110) but baseline levels that aren't much lower. Typically in the 95-105 range. I will get something in the 80s occasionally, but 100 is more common. I never really spike - even a high carb meal will only get me to 130s or so and that never really happens as I don't eat much sugar/starch at all.

    Another quick question: You've mentioned a couple times recently about this way of eating being particularly good for VISCERAL fat. That is exactly what I've found. Tremendous benefits and I feel great. I have leveled out for a while (months) in fat loss, however, with a good amount of subcutaneous fat still present. Is there another protocol for getting after this type of fat? I'm already no wheat, low carb, paleo.

    Thanks again for your excellent articles! Always learning something new.......

  • ShottleBop

    8/2/2011 1:38:20 PM |

    Do you have citations to support your statement that glycation occurs at BGs of 100 or more?  This is one of the more-commonly discussed issues on diabetes discussion boards--but folks are wont to ask for backup.

  • Jeff C

    8/2/2011 1:47:11 PM |

    Regarding glycation specifically...

    1. Do you agree that fructose ("frucation") causes more AGE than glucose?
    2. What to you make of Ray Peat's assertion that poly-fats are much more glycalating than glucose?

    "The so-called "advanced glycation end products," that have been blamed on glucose excess, are mostly derived from the peroxidation of the "essential fatty acids." The name, “glycation,” indicates the addition of sugar groups to proteins, such as occurs in diabetes and old age, but when tested in a controlled experiment, lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids produces the protein damage about 23 times faster than the simple sugars do." (Fu, et al., 1996)." - Ray Peat

  • Richard

    8/2/2011 3:21:55 PM |

    Thanks for the great article!
    I've just begun tracking blood sugars closely, changed my diet to one very low in carbs and no grains, and am determined to find ways to keep at it. I've started a blog just track my progress and keep me honest: http://transformation-transformative.blogspot.com/
    I'll also try the 15 minute testing to see where my personal peak in blood sugar occurs.
    Again, many thanks!

  • steve

    8/2/2011 3:31:08 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis:  What is the relationship between fasting BG taken at the Dr's office and A!C?  My fasting BG level is 73.5 but my A1C is 5.4.  I would have expected the A1C to more correspond to the fasting measurement; in the case of my wife it does.  Is it related more to the red blood cells lingering around longer or lipoprotein particles which increases the chance of glycation?  Recently had a larger than normal amount of carbs in a meal- rice and blueberries and BG spiked to 119, not to bad, but will experiment with carb portion to keep under 100 as BG may be a contributing factor to my CAD.  I am also a hyperabsorber of fat despite being an ApoE 3/3.

    As an aside, i have sent around a link of one of your interviews regarding Wheat Belly and many eyes have been opened as well as many looking to buy the book.  Might not be a bad idea to have a link to any of your interviews on Wheat Belly posted to this site.
    Thanks for the enlightening good work!

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/3/2011 12:23:09 AM |

    Hi, Shottle--
    This will be the topic of an upcoming discussion. The documentation of this effect is quite extensive. It is no longer a matter of "if" but "how much."

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/3/2011 12:25:11 AM |

    Hi, Jeff--
    This is one of oranges and apples comparisons.
    Fructose does indeed induce flagrant glycation. Glucose induces glycation, though less vigorously.

    However, there is a separate but very poorly named process called exogenous glycation which has less to do with glycation than with oxidation of fats.

    This will be the topic of future discussions.

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/3/2011 12:26:22 AM |

    My first thought is that, if weight loss is ongoing, there is a temporary situation of insulin resistance that generally dissipates with weight stabilization.

    It's also possible that your pancreas has inadequate baseline production of insulin. I'm hoping it's the first possibility.

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/3/2011 12:28:05 AM |

    Hi, Steve-

    You will find that, if you did frequent fingersticks around the clock, the highish A1c reflects the higher blood glucose values that occur after meals.

    Thanks for the feedback on the Wheat Belly project. I will indeed crosslink some of the more relevant discussions.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    8/3/2011 2:39:31 AM |

    Advanced glycation end products (AGE) involve some of haemoglobin's hydro-carbon Beta side chain valine residue linking up to non-polar "glucose" aldehyde compounds and certain non-"glucose" aldehydes. Various pathological kinds of AGEs can occur from distinct events; in one situation it is macrophage activity producing enzymatic myelo-peroxidase, which can activate hypochlorite favoring a serine amino acid wing to form up to make the AGE called glyco-aldehyde.

    Probably the AGE called methyl-glyoxal is the one most relevant to diabetes prevention; since Type 1 diabetics blood serum levels of methyl-glyoxal is +/- 6 times higher than normal. This AGE can be formed when the byproduct triose-phosphate (triose = subset of carbs) is generated from the glycolytic pathway called  Embden-Meyerhof; this  byproduct risks being made into methyl-glyoxal.

    Maybe the most well known AGEs are the non-enzymatic Amadori products formed via hydrolysis; one is called glyoxal coming from glucose oxidation. And the other Amadori type AGE is 3-deoxy-glucosone (3DG), which requires fructo-selysine and the fructos-amine 3 kinase cascade to shuffle together 3DG.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    8/3/2011 2:40:38 AM |

    Diabetes reveals the problem with AGEs; this is because diabetics risk incurring kidney nephro-pathy, One of the pathological results is oxidative kidney stress, which limits sodium (Na) excretion thereby fostering  hyper-tension . When AGEs like 3DG, glyoxal & methyl-glyoxal  (among others, like pentosidine ) circulate into the kidneys their carbonyl compounds  are hard to clear by the kidneys; the side effect is to engender  uric uremia problems and meanwhile levels of carbonyls build up in what is called "carbonyl stress".
    Japan research of the plant compound chamaemeloside found that in humans it lowered levels of the AGEs 3DG & pentosidne better than any other natural remedy; optimal response was reduction of down to 1/5 th of subject's starting levels.  Chamaemeloside is the active compound in chamomile (Anthemis noblis); the extraction formula was 1 Kg of chamomile flowers steeped covered in 20 Lt. water for 3 hours at 80* celcius ( a lab temperature probably not critical for home remedy preparation).

  • Peter Silverman

    8/3/2011 12:56:13 PM |

    Volek and Phinney in their new book about carbohydrate restriction think that as you increase  fat from 30% to 60% of your diet, insulin resistance increases, then it drops when you go above 60%.  It seems that among the most experienced researchers of carbohydrate restriction, there's little consensus about the optimal amount of fat or carbs.  Ron Krausse, for instance, thinks 35% to 45% is optimal.

  • steve

    8/3/2011 5:23:50 PM |

    Peter:
    When these researchers talk about carb levels are they considering vegetables to be carbs, or just fruits, grains, potatoes?

  • frank weir

    8/3/2011 6:41:32 PM |

    You must mean, "can exacerbate certain disease progression...." meaning: to increase the severity, violence, or bitterness of; aggravate

  • frank weir

    8/3/2011 6:59:22 PM |

    This is wonderful information BUT I wonder if it might be unfortunate if folks who routinely have post-prandials of 120 to 140 take your 100 level as a sign of "failure"...things are seldom so cut and dried, black and white. I don't know if I'm hitting 100 or less  after every meal, but my A1C has dropped from 7.5 to 5.8 since last November restricting carbs. And I've lost 30 pounds. I will begin to be more dogmatic about one-hour glucose checks but my rough sense is that I'm not at 100 or less a majority of the time. But I might be wrong about that. Do you see what I'm getting at? Glucose control is an ongoing process that includes lots of self education since most GP's are not keen AT ALL on restricting carbs, including mine. When I read your post, my initial feeling was, "Cripes, 100 after EVERY meal? Don't think I can do that...."

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    8/4/2011 1:05:26 AM |

    From another commentator here, in an  earlier thread of Dr. Davis' here is how to use HbA1c to determine your average blood glucose level (note: this is not a morning "fasting" level) .
    1st: multiply your HbA1c by 28.7
    2nd: subtract 46.7 from 1st amount
    3rd: take last number as your average waking hours mg/dL blood glucose over last  few months  
    ex:  HbA1c of 5.4 x 28.7 = 159.98 minus 46.7 = 108.28 mg/dL of average blood glucose level

  • Peter Silverman

    8/4/2011 2:24:31 AM |

    They don't count non-starchy vegetable as carbs.

  • ShottleBop

    8/4/2011 3:15:11 AM |

    Thanks for the heads up!

  • Find Master

    8/4/2011 1:07:59 PM |

    Dear Web Master,

    We are in process of link building of our site to increase its relevancy and traffic.
    Can you give me information on how I can place my link on your page?

    Our link details are following:
    Title: Canadian Pharmacy
    URL: http://www.canadadrugcenter.com/
    Description:

    CanadaDrugCenter.com is America's choice for safe and affordable prescription and non-prescription medications. Our licensed Canadian mail order pharmacy will provide you with substantial savings on all your medication needs.

  • Stephanie

    8/4/2011 2:13:27 PM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I have found that if I take my carb level too low (below 50g per day) that my fasting blood glucose levels actually go up rather than down.  If my carb intake is closer to 70-80, my fasting glucose is lower.

    Have you had this experience with some of your patients?  Can you shed any light onto what might be happening?

    Thanks!
    Stephanie

  • Anne

    8/4/2011 2:34:11 PM |

    Non-starchy vegetables do have carbs and I do have to count them. A half cup of broccoli can have about 6 carbs and since I limit my carbs to no more than 15g/meal, that broccoli on my plate is significant.

    I found getting a scale that reads carbs too was an important tool for me. I found I was ofter overestimating how much of a low carb veggie I could eat. If my blood sugar starts to rise, I go back to measuring and that seems to get me back on track.

    Anne

  • majkinetor

    8/14/2011 1:25:56 PM |

    I think thats normal, its commonly encountered on paleo forums/blogs. It has something to do with physiological insulin resistance, Petro @ Hyperlipid talked about. Look here:

    http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/10/physiological-insulin-resistance.html

  • majkinetor

    8/14/2011 1:38:24 PM |

    I wouldn't suggest that everybody blindly follow CHO < 50g / day. As always, its about the context. People usually forget that. We mostly extrapolate from results of people who already have metabolic problems.

    Anyway, I am currently perfectly healthy apart from some minor dermatology problems (eczema).
    When I have prolonged periods of reduced CHO input (around 50g / day), I eventually start having some mucus problems. Dry eyes particularly, but also joint pain. I am not 100% sure if its about low carb diet, but it looks like it. Now I target 75g < CHO < 100g per day by adding small potato and a bit more chocolate to my diet.

    I think overemphasizing carb reduction is not good thing for most people. Carbs should go down by pretty big amount for most people, but not to extreme. In anyway, its better to measure then to guess. My sugar is never above 110 after meal and fasting is always around 95.

  • John F

    8/13/2012 9:48:10 AM |

    I decided to take this advice and have been tracking my 60 mins postprandial blood glucose for the past two days to see if all the years I've been low carbing have been making any difference. Especially working my way through different foods to see how they affect me and I've ranged from 64 mg/dl to 97 mg/dl so I'm pretty hapy.

    However this evening 60 minutes after my dinner of panfried steak with a creamy cajun sauce I got a reading of just 55 mg/dl. A lot of websites say this is too low. I'm 32, healthy male, 5,9", weigh 160 lbs, not diabetic and I don't feel sick so I'm not sure what to make of this low reading. The only thing I did was finish a hard CrossFit workout about 30 mins before I had dinner... so a total of 90 minutes before the blood glucose test.

    Any advice on what this "low" reading means? I'm hoping it's normal and means I'm burning fat!

Loading
Synthroid, Armour Thyroid, and the battle for T3

Synthroid, Armour Thyroid, and the battle for T3

In the last Heart Scan Blog post on thyroid issues, Is normal TSH too high?, the provocative findings of the the HUNT Study were discussed. The text of the study can be found at:

The association between TSH within the reference range and serum lipid concentrations in a population-based study. The HUNT Study

Hypothyroidism, or low thyroid that is signaled by high thyroid-stimulating hormone, TSH, is proving far more prevalent an issue than previously thought. While previous estimates put hypothyroidism as affecting only about 3% of younger populations, 10-20% of older populations (women more so), data like the HUNT Study suggest that, if lower and lower TSH levels (higher thyroid) are necessary for perfect heart health, then many more people stand to benefit than we used to think.

But another crucial issue in the world of hypothyroidism: Is T4 (thyroxine) enough? Or should we be supplementing T3 (triiodothyronine) along with T4?

Your friendly neighborhood primary care doctor or endocrinologist would likely argue vehemently that T4 (as Synthroid, Levoxyl, levothyroxine, and others) is adequate and not subject to the impurities and contaminants of natural thyroid extracts. They would also argue that T4 is effectively converted to T3 at the tissue level, and exogenous supplementation is unnecessary.

Others--most of all thyroid patients themselves, along with thyroid advocates like Mary Shomon and Janie Bowthorpe, along with some physicians--argue that supplementing T3 along with T4 can be very important. They argue that people feel better, have more physical energy, lose weight more effectively, and more completely resolve many of the phenomena of hypothryoidism with T3 added. There are also some data that argue the same.

Adding T3 to the mix may address the presumed poor conversion of T4 to T3 that is peculiar to some people. It may overcome the "reverse T3" phenomenon, the production of a useless look-alike T3 that occurs in some people. It may also (anecdotally) exert greater effects on some lipid/lipoprotein parameters, such as Lp(a).

My experiences adding T3 to T4 have been mixed: Some feel better, others do not. Some show objective improvements, others do not.

Nonetheless, hypothyroidism, or incompletely corrected hypothryoidism by way of inadequate T3, is an issue to consider in your plaque-control program.

More on this somewhat complex issue, along with practical solutions to consider, can be found on the Special Report to be released this week on the Track Your Plaque website.

Comments (2) -

  • Anonymous

    7/6/2008 7:51:00 PM |

    This is what I hate about medicine: one size fits all. Thyroid treatment should be based on symptom relief using labwork to make sure there isn't overtreatment. And all thyroid supplements should be available to the patient. Not just what the doctor gets paid (oops!) to use.

  • Anonymous

    7/7/2008 5:15:00 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis,

    Check this link out...  The doctor at the link references your work.  Not sure if you're familiar with his.

    I've saved the link on two lines that need to be combined to paste into the browser.

    http://jeffreydach.com/2008/06/26/
    saving-tim-russert-and-george-carlin-by-jeffrey-dach-md.aspx

    The interesting thing about the article for me was this...

    I have previously noticed about 1/3 of my eyebrows had gotten thinner.  And I also have wondered about the puffiness around my eyelids.

    Sheesh...

    What do you think about that site?  If you don't answer here in comments perhaps you could address in your Special Report or at your blog?

    Thanks for all you do.

    wccaguy

Loading
Are you wheat-free?

Are you wheat-free?

According to the recent Heart Scan Blog poll, Are you wheat-free?, the 173 respondents said:

Yes, I am free of wheat products.
87 (50%)

No, I include wheat products in my diet.
73 (42%)

I'm not sure.
1 (0%)

I think you're nuts.
12 (6%)


That's kind of what I expected.

There are people who have eliminated wheat and experienced nothing except a feeling of deprivation. These people are in the minority. Though the poll was not set up to reflect this (i.e., asked who tried it and experienced no perceptible benefit), in my experience, this applies to about 20% of people. Little happens with elimination of wheat beyond modest weight loss. Those are the people who generally think I'm nuts.

Or, these people may have been brainwashed by "official" agencies like the USDA, the American Diabetes Association, and American Heart Association and the constant marketing of (high markup) grain products like Cheerios and Shredded Wheat . Some people are really uncomfortable going against the "grain" of popular public opinion.

Then there are the people who try to eliminate wheat and fail. They can't deal with the overwhelming fatigue, mental fog, and moodiness that comes with withdrawal from wheat, the phenomenon of converting from a sugar-burning metabolism to a fat-burning metabolism. Although wheat withdrawal usually runs its course in 2-5 days, some people find it intolerable. (That would be another fun poll to run: Have you experienced wheat-withdrawal?) Occasionally, the withdrawal is replaced by endless cravings, a phenomenon that applies to only about 10% of people. These are the true "wheat addicts." These are the people who eliminate wheat, lose 40 lbs, then regain it when they have one cracker and the floodgates of impulse control crumble.

Then there are the majority, 50% in the poll, though more like 70% in my face-to-face experience. Why is my experience skewed? Well, the people I deal with every day come because of coronary disease in some form (abnormal heart scan score, for instance) or because of lipid or lipoprotein abnormalities. So my experienced is skewed towards people who are likely to have something abnormal, such as high triglycerides or small LDL particles, both of which are created by including wheat in the diet.

This last group also shows unexpected effects of wheat elimination: substantial weight loss, dramatic reductions in blood sugar and triglycerides, increase in HDL, reductions in small LDL, reduction in c-reactive protein and other inflammatory measures. Appetite shrinks considerably. Not uncommonly, improved well-being, reduction in bowel complaints like cramping or "irritable bowel syndrome" is experienced, some rashes clear, occasionally arthritis will improve. See below for some of the testimonials to this experience.

When I first set out to advise people to eliminate wheat, I did it because I reasoned that it would be a quick and simple way to get people to reduce blood sugars and help correct the ubiquitous metabolic syndrome that afflicts nearly 50 million Americans now. And it did indeed accomplish that simple goal. But I did not expect all the other benefits to develop, the dramatic weight loss, improved well-being, reduction in hunger, etc.

I view wheat elimination as an easy-to-remember, digestible way to obtain enormous health benefits in a coronary plaque-control program, one that works for most--but not all--people. And I relate this experience not to sell you something, but to simply relate what I see as the truth, a way that is contrary to conventional advice yet works enormously well.



Unsolicited testimonials of people who have successfully been wheat-free:

Barbara W said:

It's true! We've done it. My husband and I stopped eating all grains and sugar in February. At this point, we really don't miss them any more. It was a huge change, but it's worth the effort. I've lost over 20 pounds (10 to go)and my husband has lost 45 pounds (20 to go). On top of it, our body shapes have changed drastically. It is really amazing. I've got my waist back (and a whole wardrobe of clothes) - I'm thrilled.

I'm also very happy to be eating foods that I always loved like eggs, avocados, and meats - without feeling guilty that they're not good for me.

With the extremely hot weather this week in our area, we thought we'd "treat" ourselves to small ice cream cones. To our surprise, it wasn't that much of a treat. Didn't even taste as good as we'd anticipated. I know I would have been much more satisfied with a snack of smoked salmon with fresh dill, capers, chopped onion and drizzled with lemon juice.

Aside from weight changes, we both feel so much better in general - feel much more alert and move around with much greater flexibility, sleep well, never have any indigestion. We're really enjoying this. It's like feeling younger.

It's not a diet for us. This will be the way we eat from now on. Actually, we think our food has become more interesting and varied since giving up all the "white stuff". I guess we felt compelled to get a little more creative.

Eating out (or at other peoples' places) has probably been the hardest part of this adjustment. But now we're getting pretty comfortable saying what we won't eat. I'm starting to enjoy the reactions it produces.


Weight loss, increased energy, less abdominal bloating, better sleep--I've seen it many times, as well.


Dotslady said:

I was a victim of the '80s lowfat diet craze - doc told me I was obese, gave me the Standard American Diet and said to watch my fat (I'm not a big meat eater, didn't like mayo ... couldn't figure out where my fat was coming from! maybe the fries - I will admit I liked fries). I looked to the USDA food pyramid and to increase my fiber for the constipation I was experiencing. Bread with 3 grams of fiber wasn't good enough; I turned to Kashi cereals for 11 years. My constipation turned to steattorrhea and a celiac disease diagnosis! *No gut pains!* My PCP sent me to the gastroenterologist for a colonscopy because my ferritin was a 5 (20 is low range). Good thing I googled around and asked him to do an endoscopy or I'd be a zombie by now.

My symptoms were depression & anxiety, eczema, GERD, hypothyroidism, mild dizziness, tripping, Alzheimer's-like memory problems, insomnia, heart palpitations, fibromyalgia, worsening eyesight, mild cardiomyopathy, to name a few.

After six months gluten-free, I asked my gastroenterologist about feeling full early ... he said he didn't know what I was talking about! *shrug*

But *I* knew -- it was the gluten/starches! My satiety level has totally changed, and for the first time in my life I feel NORMAL!



Feeling satisfied with less is a prominent effect in my experience, too. You need to eat less, you're driven to snack less, less likely to give in to those evil little bedtime or middle-of-the-night impulses that make you feel ashamed and guilty.



An anonymous (female) commenter said:

My life changed when I cut not only all wheat, but all grains from my diet.

For the first time in my life, I was no longer hungry -no hunger pangs between meals; no overwhelming desire to snack. Now I eat at mealtimes without even thinking about food in between.

I've dropped 70 pounds, effortlessly, come off high blood pressure meds and control my blood sugar without medication.

I don't know whether it was just the elimination of grain, especially wheat, or whether it was a combination of grain elimnation along with a number of other changes, but I do know that mere reduction of grain consumption still left me hungry. It wasn't until I elimnated it that the overwhelming redution in appetite kicked in.

As a former wheat-addicted vegetarian, who thought she was eating healthily according to all the expert advice out there at the time, I can only shake my head at how mistaken I was.




Stan said:

It's worth it and you won't look back!

Many things will improve, not just weight reduction: you will think clearer, your reflexes will improve, your breathing rate will go down, your blood pressure will normalize. You will never or rarely have a fever or viral infections like cold or flu. You will become more resistant to cold temperature and you will rarely feel tired, ever!



Ortcloud said:

Whenever I go out to breakfast I look around and I am in shock at what people eat for breakfast. Big stack of pancakes, fruit, fruit juice syrup, just like you said. This is not breakfast, this is dessert ! It has the same sugar and nutrition as a birthday cake, would anyone think cake is ok for breakfast ? No, but that is exactly the equivalent of what they are eating. Somehow we have been duped to think this is ok. For me, I typically eat an omelette when I go out, low carb and no sugar. I dont eat wheat but invariably it comes with the meal and I try to tell the waitress no thanks, they are stunned. They try to push some other type of wheat or sugar product on me instead, finally I have to tell them I dont eat wheat and they are doubly stunned. They cant comprehend it. We have a long way to go in terms of re-education.

Yes. Don't be surprised at the incomprehension, the rolled eyes, even the anger that can sometimes result. Imagine that told you that the food you've come to rely on and love is killing you!



Anne said:

I was overweight by only about 15lbs and I was having pitting edema in my legs and shortness of breath. My cardiologist and I were discussing the possible need of an angiogram. I was three years out from heart bypass surgery.

Before we could schedule the procedure, I tested positive for gluten sensitivity through www.enterolab.com. I eliminated not only wheat but also barley and rye and oats(very contaminated with wheat) from my diet. Within a few weeks my edema was gone, my energy was up and I was no longer short of breath. I lost about 10 lbs. The main reason I gave up gluten was to see if I could stop the progression of my peripheral neuropathy. Getting off wheat and other gluten grains has given me back my life. I have been gluten free for 4 years and feel younger than I have in many years.

There are many gluten free processed foods, but I have found I feel my best when I stick with whole foods.



Ann has a different reason (gluten enteropathy, or celiac disease) for wanting to be wheat-free. But I've seen similar improvements that go beyond just relief of the symptoms attributable to the inflammatory intestinal effects of gluten elimination.



Wccaguy said:

I have relatively successfully cut carbs and grains from my diet thus far.

Because I've got some weight to lose, I have tried to keep the carb count low and I've lost 15 pounds since then.

I have also been very surprised at the significant reduction in my appetite. I've read about the experience of others with regard to appetite reduction and couldn't really imagine that it could happen for me too. But it has.

A few weeks ago, I attended a party catered by one of my favorite italian restaurants and got myself offtrack for two days. Then it took me a couple of days to get back on track because my appetite returned.

Check out Jimmy Moore's website for lots of ideas about variations of foods to try. The latest thing I picked up from Jimmy is the good old-fashioned hard boiled egg. Two or three eggs with some spicy hot sauce for breakfast and a handful of almonds mid-morning plus a couple glasses of water and I'm good for the morning no problem.

I find myself thinking about lunch not because I'm really hungry but out of habit.

The cool thing too now is that the more I do this, the more I'm just not tempted much to do anything but this diet.

Comments (25) -

  • Susan

    9/24/2008 3:18:00 PM |

    I was plagued by knee pain for years. It came and went in severity, but it was always there. When I ditched bread for weight loss, the pain went away, but it took several months (and a particularly bad recurrence when I went to France for two weeks) for me to realize what was happening.

    Knowing the consequences of eating wheat makes it a lot easier for me to keep it out of my diet.

  • Peter Silverman

    9/24/2008 3:56:00 PM |

    I can't figure out if the main problem is 1. wheat 2. carbohydrates 3. all grains 4. refined grains, or 5. overeating.  It certainly seems like lots of the countries that eat rice all day long (Japan, for instance)have a fraction of the heart disease we do, but that doesn't fully answer my question.

  • Nyn

    9/24/2008 5:13:00 PM |

    I have been reading your blog for some time, and I believe that wheat has a bad effect on my body. I've gone without wheat for about 2 weeks successfully, and admit I felt better at the end of it - clearer minded and noticeably less cravings. I've quit wheat over and over like an alcoholic trying to get sober. But all it's taken for me has been one unplanned day, one rushed afternoon, one span of time where I'm starving and have been caught out where there is nothing but wheat-related food, and I backslide. And then I am right back to square one or worse, wanting even more carbs/wheat.

    These success stories are wonderful, and truly inspiring. But I want to see, or maybe need to see, someone come out with a book that explains what their day to day life of eating without wheat is like. What they do when they get up in the A.M. and have to take their breakfast to work, what they take for lunch, what they whip up for a family of 4 at 6 after working all day...and what they fill their shopping carts with. It is wonderful to hear how great these folks are doing, but it is discouraging because I cannot for the life of me see the how that would also help me. Do folks that have quit wheat carry a list with them of the 10 foods they can? How does one handle the social aspect of life that says you pay $5 for a burger and throw away everything but the .50 patty? My apologies for going on and on here, I do not mean to be confrontational. I enjoy your advice and knowledge, and have learned much. This cannot be as easy as 'just quitting' or people really would just quit.

  • Nancy LC

    9/24/2008 5:31:00 PM |

    Giving up wheat (and later all grains) made an enormous difference to me.  I had such brain fog while eating it I thought I had early onset Alzheimer's.  I had terrible IBS, running to the bathroom 15 times a day.  I had pain in every joint and a diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis (without fusing).  

    Giving it up the joint pain is gone, the IBS is vastly better and my brain feels like it used to... sharp and my memory is great!

    I'm low carb too and that plays into it as well but wheat (gluten) was a major part of my problem.

    I have been wheat free for 3 years now.

  • steve

    9/24/2008 6:39:00 PM |

    the meditteranean diet of Greece and other ocuntires of that region consume grains,and wheat, but yet are quite healthy with little evidence of heart disease.  Perhaps wheat is not the villian, but something else in the diet we eat such as as to much sugar/starch

  • Roger

    9/24/2008 8:22:00 PM |

    Peter raises a very good point, one I hope can be addressed.  Since Dr. Davis brought up the wheat issue, I've done a lot of googling around, and while there seems to be some agreement of a correlation between too many (or too refined) carbs and CHD, I can't really find any peer-reviewed studies specifically singling out the cereal grain wheat as the culprit.  Of course, wheat is the most common refined grain, and the one we tend to eat the most, so if this is the connection, (too much wheat, especially as refined flour) than I get it.  But as one who answered "no" on the survey, and still eats wheat on occasion, I should explain.

    A couple years ago I realized to my horror that my Body Mass Index was no longer in the "healthy" range, i.e. under 25.  I know there is some controversy about this arbitrary formula, but for me, looking in the mirror confirmed it.  Somehow, despite regular exercise and eating what I thought was a healthy diet, I had, over the years, put on 30 extra pounds.

    I first experimented mostly with portion control, and had a bit of success.  Then I became familiar with Dr. Walter Willett, who recommends a Mediterranean-style diet.  After communication with Dr. Willett, I cut carbs even more, trying to raise my low HDL.  For me, cutting out all sugary beverages, most bread, baked sweets and snack foods, and severely restricting other sweets like candy to token amounts, made a huge difference.  I astounded myself by losing all 30 pounds, getting my BMI back into the "healthy" range.  All this without any starvation or deprivation.  So the lower-carb way has been a wonderful discovery.

    Having said that, I find it difficult and probably unnecessary to eliminate all grain products, including wheat.  For breakfast I find that a bowl of whole oat groats, soaked overnight in hot water and mixed with fresh-ground flax and some chopped walnuts and dates is a wonderfully filling and not-too-sweet way to get me going.  At lunch I will sometimes have a piece of dense German rye bread.  When we have Chinese food, a little rice goes a long ways, but a stir-fry with absolutely no rice feels odd.

    Every once in a while I bake bread from grain which I grind fresh.  Without wheat it is very hard to have enough gluten to allow the bread to rise, so I usually add some  hard red spring wheat to the mix.  I slice my loaves into very thin slices and savor every bite.  It's a completely different aesthetic experience from mindlessly chowing down on commercial bread or bakery products.  I also bake whole-grain waffles for my kids on special occasions, and have a square or two for old times' sake.

    So for me, moderate intake of grains (in small portions and as little-processed as possible) is okay.  I have no celiac disease and have noticed nothing different when I throw some wheat berries into my morning oat porridge.  Call me skeptical, but it's just hard for me to believe that the cereal that built the pyramids and sustains the long-lived Hunzas is intrinsically any worse than any other grain, though I do understand Dr. Davis's message about wheat's ubiquity in our food culture.  If being categorically wheat-free helps some folks to stay strong, then I say more power to them, but for me it is just too wonderful a grain to give up.  And, as Peter as noted, millions, actually billions of folks have lived long and healthy lives eating grain, including wheat.  So until further peer-reviewed studies indict wheat and grains in general, I will keep eating a moderate amount of them.

    On another thread we can discuss the role of grain in supplying simple calories--feeding people--across our wide planet.

  • rabagley

    9/24/2008 10:17:00 PM |

    I said that I included wheat in my diet because during my weekly cheat meal, I don't care what's in it, and more often than not, there's wheat.

    As for the Japanese, the association with heart health has more to do with increased fish intake than their moderate intake of carbs (including rice).  The correlation with rice consumption is one of the classic examples of "correlation is not causation".

  • Gyan

    9/25/2008 4:21:00 AM |

    Is the problem with grains mainly because of fiber (15g in whole wheat flour per 120 g).
    So is whole wheat even worse than refined flour?

  • Anne

    9/25/2008 11:48:00 AM |

    There is evidence that the proteins in wheat, barley and rye can cause heart problems. Here is a link to the section on heart disease in The Gluten File. http://jccglutenfree.googlepages.com/heartdisease

    In the current issue of Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care there is an article "The emerging role of the gut in chronic heart failure". The abstract says "Recent studies suggest an altered morphology, permeability, and absorption of the digestive tract in chronic heart failure. " The PubMed abstract is 18685461

    Gluten is one cause of problems with permeability and absorption of the digestive tract.

    I am gluten free because gluten makes me sick. I am grain free as I feel my best without other grains. I am low carb to keep my blood glucose under control. What do I eat? I eat all the veges, proteins and fats I want. My shopping cart is filled with whole fresh foods. No, it is not easy, but my improved health is worth it. I don't crave wheat products now so I am not tempted when cakes and donuts are brought into work.

    Twelve years ago, when I started having problems with CAD, I went on a low fat, AHA diet. I gained weight, triglycerides went up, I had SOB and pitting edema. I said "At least I don't have to give up bread. You might as well kill me if I ever have to give up my bread" Little did I know that it was the bread that was killing me. Yes, grain free for me is a small price to pay for good health.

  • Anonymous

    9/25/2008 12:20:00 PM |

    Asymptomatic celiac disease is very common. A dramatic positive reaction to going wheatfree (or intense withdrawal issues) could justify testing at Enterolab.com (these tests can still be valid for about a year on a gluten free diet).

    Why? you might want to avoid gluten in meds and supplements or you might want to share the test results with your children, etc.

    Also - the GF/celiac community is well aware that many restaurants (IHOP, Denny's types) put pancake batter in their omelettes and even scrambled eggs. You'll need to inquire if you want to be certain.

  • Nyn

    9/25/2008 12:43:00 PM |

    Anne, your words are encouraging. Think back to when you were quitting wheat, everyone makes it sound so easy (which makes me feel like a failure for struggling so). I'm off fresh produce because of IBS symptoms. If eating wheat did the same thing fresh veggies and fruit did to me, it would be much easier to quit. I'm supposed to be off dairy for the same reasons, but have managed to consume some dairy without problem. That leaves cooked vegetables and meat, both of which I eat when I can, but it's difficult to eat cooked green beans when driving in the car. I have tried eating packaged lunch meat on the go, but when that is all I'm eating, it makes toast even more appetizing. Again, I appreciate everyone's successes, and I mean no offense, but from the still-addicted crowd, it starts to sound like those who've lost hundreds of pounds on morning TV shows who exclaim, "I exercise 3 hours a day everyday, but it's worth it to be thin!" What does one do when they truly do not have those metaphoric 3 hours of time in their life? It is as discouraging as it is encouraging...

    However, congratulations on gaining control of your health.

  • wendys

    9/25/2008 3:44:00 PM |

    I have taken your advice and am attempting to eliminate wheat from my diet.  If I take a break from it I notice immediately and I do feel tired and have cravings for a couple of days.  

    I decided to go wheat free becaue my weight was going up and I couldn't seem to stop it.  Happily stopping wheat has made a big difference and my weight has started comming down.

    Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    9/25/2008 6:45:00 PM |

    In response to comments like "What about the Japanese who eat rice all day" and "those eating the mediteranean diet consume wheat and grains do not suffer heart disease so maybe wheat is not the culprit".
    If the Japanese ate rice all day and the greeks at nothing but grains all day they would be dying in droves. Luckily, they eat very little rice and grain and a lot of fish, animal products, fat (yes even Okinawans eat lots of lard), liver pate, cream, butter, etc. The low intake of rice/grains and the high intake of protein and fat is what makes these cultures healthier than North American.And when the Japanese make sushi, I'm sure that the first and second ingredients are not rice and high fructose corn syrup like it is here.

  • NancW

    9/25/2008 8:56:00 PM |

    At age 40, two and 1/2 years ago, I determined that wheat (gluten) was causing my anxiety attacks, depression, fatigue, joint pain and rapid weight loss (among other symptoms). My PCP had been suggesting statins for high cholesterol and anti-depressants for over a year. Six months gluten-free found me happy, 10 lbs. lighter, LDL down 40 pts, and HDL up 7 pts. Fasting blood glucose went from pre-diabetic to normal.
    One year ago, after food allergy testing, I cut out dairy, yeast, corn, rice and all other grains. Seven months later my HDL was up 5 more points, my LDL down another 30 points.

    While I am not strict as far as eating low carb, and procuring and planning meals can be challenging, I do eat well, and enjoy much better physical and mental health as a result of my dietary changes. Important to someone like me with heart disease and Type 1 diabetes looming large in my family medical history.

    My PCP is amazed at the changes, and my case has prompted her to provide more dietary advice to her other patients. I'd like to see more medical professionals consider what goes into their patient's mouths before turning to meds as the only solution.

    Oh, and I really like this blog-thank you!

  • Anonymous

    9/26/2008 5:08:00 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis:

    Thanks so much for all the great informaion.  I too cut out carbs about 5 years ago, for the first time since I was 25 years old have regained my health.  Since I feel so great there is no temptation to go back.  Occasionally I eat cake at a social event, and it is enough to remind me of how lousy I use to feel, and makes me crave my day to day low carb diet.  
    I was wondering if you have come accross any information on the effects of excess fluoride in the diet and heart disease.  I recently read that it can increase the risk of heart disease and increase lp(a).  Do you have any insights into the dangers of fluoride.  I have also eliminated all obvious fluoride overexposures (is tap water, tea) from my diet, and have more energy as a result.  Thanks again.
    Olga

  • Anonymous

    9/26/2008 9:12:00 PM |

    While I do believe and respect that eliminating wheat from the diet of many people has helped improved their health  in many ways (cholesterol panel, blood sugar, weight loss, etc), is it really that black and white?

    I mean, are you suggesting that all people who eat wheat products will (or do) have these health issues.

    Is it possible that *some* people can eat wheat products and be perfectly healthy?

    Bonnie

  • Andrew

    9/26/2008 9:57:00 PM |

    As a 27-year-old male in what I would call the top physical condition of my life (14 hours of vigorous exercise per week . . . perhaps even TOO much, but I love playing sports too much), I find it extremely easy to stay relatively wheat-free, although I've never been a wheat addict.

    I'm curious what some of you that have wheat cravings CRAVE, because I don't find it too terribly difficult to stay away.  Instead of a sandwich, I wrap my chicken in lettuce, or just eat the meat mixed with a bit of mayo and stone ground mustard.  Don't get me wrong, because I do eat a bit of wheat, but maybe once or twice a month, at most.  I just don't find that there are things with wheat in them that I just can't do without.

  • Anna

    9/28/2008 9:09:00 AM |

    There has been a great discussion lately on wheat, carbs, & grains with a lot of scientific data on Stephan's Whole Health Source blog.  Check out some of the recent posts and comments.  

    Peter's Hyperlipid blog has had some past discussion (posts and comments) that is pretty damning of wheat and grains, too, though is is pretty technical biochemistry usually.

    What wheat can do in the body is fascinating and somewhat alarming.  Gyan, I think there may be some truth to the wheat fiber, in fact, being particularly damaging, perhaps making refined wheat the lesser of two evils.    But try explaining the nuances of that argument to a convinced wheatophile...especially one hooked on whole grain and bran cereal - it's an exercise in futility (and in fairness, it wasn't that many years ago I would have raised an eyebrow at the suggestion, too).  

    Roger, if one is going to consume wheat, I think you are right to grind your own fresh, and soak or ferment the grain or flour.  That minimizes some of the issues with wheat.  Though I'm not sure I'd look to the Egyptians for inspiration on diet.  There's evidence of rampant dental problems, as well as obesity and diabetes in ancient Egypt, perhaps due the high intake of wheat.   The idea that agriculture was a not-so-good path in many ways is an interesting one.

    And I'd take the Mediterranean Diet advice with a grain of salt, too.  It isn't duplicated well in non-Mediterranean cultures, anyway, because it's out of context and culture.    And just yesterday I read a newspaper article about the worry over too much processed food in Greece, which is causing all the same problems with young people that we are having, just a few paces behind us.  Japan is experiencing the same thing, as is India.  Traditional cuisines and food preparation techniques all over the world are being replaced with "convenience cuisine" and "machine cuisine", using starch and sugars as filler, and substituting industrial vegetable oils for the natural fats traditionally consumed.  It's telling that I've never been anywhere in the world where Coca-cola wasn't readily available.  Sad.

    My experience in Italy this summer was that if one could cook for oneself, it was relatively easy to eat well and with controlled carbs (by focusing on fresh veggies, eggs, dairy, seafood, and meat, especially pork - pork was everywhere in all forms, especially salami).  But in out on the street and in cafés and restaurants, I saw entirely too much bread, sugar, and starch eaten, with limited alternatives, especially for breakfast.  And there were far more overweight and unhealthy-looking locals than we are led to believe.  Can't speak for other Mediterranean areas.  Others I know and other readers here have said it is better in Southern France, for instance.  

    I didn't come to my conclusions from one article, one blog, or one book (though Taubes' book nailed the coffin shut on a few suspicions).  I've been puzzling through these issues for several years, and it is the preponderance of the credible evidence I keep finding that is so convincing.  This Heart Scan blog has been very helpful, too.  I'm always considering the contrary evidence, too, but it usually isn't very compelling or credible.

    I'm more convinced than ever that wheat in particular, but grains in general (at least as they are conventionally consumed in contemporary industrial societies) are to be minimized, or even eliminated, along with modern industrial oils (PUFA  and hydrogenated vegetable oils such as soy, corn, canola, cottonseed, etc.).  If consumed, soaking/fermenting are essential and flour should be freshly ground, not pre-ground.  For those with an intact glucose metabolism, non-grain starches are probably ok, especially if consumed without modern PUFA vegetable oils, but unfortunately, my glucose control is impaired already so I have to refrain from most non-grain starches, too.

    Nyn,

    There are gobs of books that give meal suggestions and recipes that don't include wheat.  Some LC cookbooks are wheat-free but not all.  In fact, many LC recipes and products have added wheat gluten to make up for the lack of starch, so that is even worse.  Check out Mark's Daily Apple blog.  Mark has a paleo (stone age) way of viewing diet, which tend to be easy to manage.  

    My main adjustment with wheat was getting over the food "transportation" issues.  If you think about it, bread, crackers, tortillas, etc., are often the "vehicle" for the good stuff, so we can eat with our hands.  In medieval times, people didn't even use plates, they used big slices of  bread for plates, which sopped up the juices and gravies of the meat (fresh veggies were fairly limited, btw).  Giving up wheat often means giving up eating with your hands.  I've just gotten used to using knives and forks more often.  It's tidier anyway.  

    And I don't even think about tossing the bread way because of the cost, because it is just wrapping in my mind.  In most cases, if I can't afford to eat good food when out, then I eat at home or pack a meal.   Lately I've been finding that if I ask in advance to hold the bread, fries,  or whatever starch comes with the meal, a side salad ,  more veggies or fruit, or other option is offered as a substitute.  

    Many of Dana Carpender's LC recipes are wheat-free, such as nut crusts for pies, etc. I also use Bruce Fife's books with coconut flour recipes.  I especially like his Butter Coconut cookies and have blogged about the recipe several times, with variations.  I have Fife's wheat-free low sugar coffee cake in the oven right now, for my son's birthday party tomorrow (also good because a number of his friends are gluten-intolerant or allergic).  But in general, I bake a lot less now and usually limit it to special occasions.  Home-made ice cream, baked egg custard, or super dark chocolate are more often our dessert if we are indulging.  Sometimes cheesecake with nut crust, if I feel like making ricotta cheese first.

    Dropping the old habits, especially when under pressure, is much easier when you have given some thought to  adopting new habits and coping mechanisms, as well as advance preparation  (shopping lists, making over your pantry, pre-prepping ingredients, recipe support).  Otherwise it is too easy to go back to the old ways in moments of desperation.  Knowing why the change is a good one is also useful to stick to the plan.  Now that I know wheat issues are about more than just the carbs, it's harder to give in.

  • Anna

    10/5/2008 5:35:00 PM |

    " it's difficult to eat cooked green beans when driving in the car."  

    I'm really hoping you were joking about driving and eating.

    If you were serious, I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but it's hard to drive while eating just about anything, not to mention very unsafe (distracted drivers are a huge cause of costly and deadly car accidents).  For many reasons, it's healthier to separate driving and eating.  

    Besides, no matter what you eat or where, your meals shouldn't be eaten on the run day-in-day-out.  Stress hormones and the digestive system don't work well together.  

    There is a lot to be said for sitting down to a relaxed and enjoyable meal, preferably with enjoyable company.  Even if dining alone, savoring the food, allows for far better digestion than gulping it down in a rush.  And if the food isn't worth savoring, then why eat it?

    I don't mean to come across like a mom lecturing on how to eat or not eat, but I think in the US we've really developed a warped and unhealthy way of eating, mindless and rushed, often without companionship, not very nutritious food, and not very tasty unless it is doctored up with lab chemicals.  It's easy to see a difference if traveling outside the US.  In most European countries, school children eat real food, made from scratch,  on real plates in their cafeterias instead of starchy, cheap microwaved pre-cooked chicken-like substances or bean & cheese burritos.  If they can feed their kids like civilized human beings, why can't we?  

    And I'm not saying it never happens, but I don't think that most Europeans make it a habit to eat their food in their cars very often, let alone while driving.  Many European model cars still don't even have drink cup holders.  One can't even sell cars in the US now without cup holders for every passenger.  In fact, it's hard to get coffee to go in Europe unless one goes to a McDonald's.  It might be hard to imagine, but there is something to be said for sitting down, relaxing a few minutes, even to have just a cup of coffee or tea, instead of lugging a paper cup, travel mug, or Big Gulp around.   This is one where I should follow my own advice more often - I too often prepare a beverage, even water, to go when I leave the house.  

    Our lives are so rushed (often unnecessarily) and meals are one place where we really could make significant changes and reap health benefits (or at least not let our health suffer).  Even if eating fast food, going inside to sit and eat at a table has got  to be better on n a hormonal level than trying to stuff it in while driving or sitting in a parking lot with the engine idling.

    Ok, I do sound like  a mom.  Smile  Guilty as charged.

  • Nyn

    10/7/2008 2:28:00 AM |

    "And if the food isn't worth savoring, then why eat it? "

    Because we must eat - whether food is good or not, we must eat to survive. And while savoring food is a great and wonderful thing, it has caused me a great deal of heartache and difficulty. Is this not approaching the problem of weight and dieting with the idea that enjoying or 'savoring' food will make you want less of it because you made your taste buds happy?

    I agree with everything you've said about taking the time to eat and enjoy and reduce stress, although Starbucks are all over the place and portable coffee/tea has long been a fav for our friends 'cross the pond. I recall my European cars having some form of holder for a drink, and now that I think about it, one of them was old enough to not have rear seat belts. But even if my memory is off, there's no point debating how much better and thinner Europeans are because they sit down and savor a meal. (Have you ever eaten British food? Savor???!)

    I write this a bit flip and with a smile on my face, but honestly, if I had the time to sit down and enjoy a meal, gazing out the window and listening to classical music as I reflected on my day, I'd also have time to shop for, prepare, package, and savor every meal I ate, as well as burn it off in post-eating workouts. Yes we move too fast here, yes we are stressed and overworked, and yes we all need to slow down. But the fact of the matter is that's not going to happen any time soon. Not in my lifetime, and maybe not in my children's. In order for something to stick, I have to not only incorporate it into my life, but make it possible to incorporate.

    I know you're trying to help, and your comments are appreciated. We'd all do well to take heed to it. However, I believe our solutions have to be bigger than our should haves for success.

  • Anonymous

    12/28/2008 11:32:00 PM |

    Someone said:

    "In response to comments like "What about the Japanese who eat rice all day" and "those eating the mediteranean diet consume wheat and grains do not suffer heart disease so maybe wheat is not the culprit".
    If the Japanese ate rice all day and the greeks at nothing but grains all day they would be dying in droves. Luckily, they eat very little rice and grain and a lot of fish, animal products, fat (yes even Okinawans eat lots of lard), liver pate, cream, butter, etc. The low intake of rice/grains and the high intake of protein and fat is what makes these cultures healthier than North American.And when the Japanese make sushi, I'm sure that the first and second ingredients are not rice and high fructose corn syrup like it is here."

    I very much agree with almost everything on this blog, but the above is simply false. I have lived in Japan and I can tell you that the Japanese do in fact eat rice at every meal and for snacks between meals too. What is so radically different from the standard US diet is mainly the PORTION size, which is TINY relative to the US size. In addition they eat a lot of foodstuffs that are unpalatable but undoubtedly very good for us, like natto (YEAUCH!!!). They also eat lots of raw fish and whole shellfish. But mainly, they eat sticky rice, which is white, not whole grain, and very glutinous. So much rice I wanted to SCREAM!

  • Anonymous

    2/7/2009 7:38:00 PM |

    "And when the Japanese make sushi, I'm sure that the first and second ingredients are not rice...."

    Well, the main ingredients in making sushi is water, japanese rice, japanese rice vinegar, and salt.

  • Lonnie Fogel

    2/19/2009 4:37:00 AM |

    I am intrigued by your views on the harmful effects of wheat (I assume all wheat, including whole wheat). Can you point me to a medical reference, especially a peer-reviewed study to confirm this? Thaks.

  • BeckerConsulting

    3/12/2009 4:37:00 PM |

    Lonnie
    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/76/2/351
    You are correct that further study is needed.

    My story is that I had been on satins and experienced muscle damage.  My cardiologist and general doctor told muscle weakness was normal.  I went to another doctor who did a simple blood test for creatine kinase whiched showed that muscle cells were being damaged.  The cardiologist put me on niacin.  This helped with triglycerides.  but still not satisfied he prescribed zetia.  One look on the internet and I saw how pointless.  The other doctor advised me to try red rice yeast.  That helped.  On my own I quite buying bread.  Still eat it when I am on a holiday.  My triglycerides  plummeted and my LDL dropped 50 points.  My total cholesterol is now 150.  What can I say? It worked for me.

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 2:25:57 PM |

    When I first set out to advise people to eliminate wheat, I did it because I reasoned that it would be a quick and simple way to get people to reduce blood sugars and help correct the ubiquitous metabolic syndrome that afflicts nearly 50 million Americans now. And it did indeed accomplish that simple goal. But I did not expect all the other benefits to develop, the dramatic weight loss, improved well-being, reduction in hunger, etc.

Loading