Heart disease "reversal" gives health a bad name

28. September 2006 William Davis (0)
Put the search phrase "reverse heart disease" into your internet search engine, and you'll uncover an astonishing range of sites, all making extravagant promises.

The treatment programs offered range from the bizarre (colonic irrigation, magnetism, etc.), to centers using conventional approaches like statin drugs and low-fat diets, to sites that make lofty predictions with few unique tools (slash the fat and heart disease dissolves).

95% or more of the sites you turn up are clearly pandering to the unknowing, the unsophisticated, the hopeless, or other helpless niche groups. Homeopathic preparations, chelation, magnical combinations of herbals, you name it, you'll find it attached to claims for heart disease reversal.

I've seen people use many of these treatments. Is there any effect on the rate of increase of the heart scan score? Do they impact on the 30% per year expected rate of increase? Absolutely not.

Unfortunately, this gives anyone practicing truly effective methods to reverse coronary plaque a bad name. Just associating with this suspect group of "practitioners" can make us look bad--guilt by association.

Whenever someone claims to have the secret of heart disease reversal, I ask "Can you prove it?" Show me some evidence. It doesn't necessarily have to be $30 million drug company sponsored study, but some evidence of effectiveness should be available. The only thing we should take on faith is our religion, not our health care.

Our growing number of people who have, indeed, reversed their heart scan scores--reversed heart disease--to me is persuasive evidence of the value of the Track Your Plaque approach. Not foolproof, not 100%, but the best damned approach I'm aware of, by a long shot.
Tags :

Add comment

Loading
HDL for Dummies

HDL for Dummies

25. May 2008 William Davis (10)
I frequently peruse conventional health websites to keep track of their message. One painfully conventional (read "drug company-supported") website that echoes the standard advice on heart disease and heart health is Everyday Health .

Since I subscribe to the newsletters for many conventional sites, I received an e-mail that took me to this Q & A about HDL cholesterol:

Q: I'm 36 years old and my good cholesterol is too low. What can I do?
– Nilsa, Florida

Dr. Lori Mosca of New York-Presbyterian Hospital responds:

A: A woman's HDL goal should be greater than 50 mg/dL (greater than 40 mg/dL in men). You can raise your HDL levels by eating a diet low in saturated fat and trans fat but high in monounsaturated fats. Lose weight if you need to and get at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise on a minimum of four days per week. If you smoke, quit. Despite positive lifestyle changes, though, some individuals may still be candidates for HDL-raising drug therapy because they are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Discuss your options with your health care provider.


Are you satisified with that answer? I certainly am not.

First of all, is this something you've never heard before? "Eat right, exercise, cut your unhealthy fats." Then why do people who follow this sort of conventional advice often still fail? Is the next step always medication?

Here's the part that Dr. Mosca and other conventional, drug-minded "authorities" have left out:

To raise HDL powerfully--not to 40 mg/dl for males or 50 mg/dl for females, but to 60, 70 or 80 mg/dl--think about the following strategies:

--Eliminate wheat and cornstarch products. I have droned on endlessly about this concept, but it is enormously effective. While the weight loss that inevitably follows elimination of these foods adds to the HDL-raising effect, there is also an independent effect, as well.

--Fish oil--The omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil reduce triglycerides. Triglycerides accelerate the destruction of HDL. Remove triglycerides, HDL goes up. (Though krill oil may share, even surpass this effect, we need more data than the single manufacturer-sponsored study.) Of course, this requires real doses, not the namby-pamby doses you often read about.

--Vitamin D--Achieving normal levels of 25(OH) vitamin D raises HDL with power I have never witnessed from any other strategy before, barring weight loss of 30+ lbs. Readers of the Heart Scan Blog know that just taking vitamin D is not enough. Verification with blood levels is an absolute necessity, particularly if raising HDL maximally is among your goals.

--Adding back saturated fat. I say "adding back" since most of us (including myself) went too far down the "saturated fat is bad" path over the past few years. While I do not advocate a carte blanche approach to saturated fat, I believe that adding back eggs (preferably free-range and/or omega-3 rich), lean meats, and hard cheeses is a good idea. The saturated fat in these foods raise HDL 5 or more mg/dl.

--Dark chocolate--Or other cocoa prepartions. What a cool way to raise HDL! Reach for the lowest-sugar, highest cocoa preparations.

--Alcoholic beverages--I am partial to the red wine/flavonoid-rich concept, being a wine drinker. Although all alcoholic beverages raise HDL due to the ethanol content, for benefits beyond alcohol (as well as to avoid wheat-based drinks like beer), I do believe that the bulk of data argue for flavonoid-rich red wines from southern France, Italy, and California.

--Achieve ideal weight--The toughest of all. But eliminating wheat and cornstarch makes it far easier.


Follow the conventional advice of those like Dr. Lori Mosca, and the majority of people will fail. ("It just so happens that I have a prescription drug just for that purpose!")

Buck the conventional advice, adopt strategies that won't be found in the drug ads, nor be provided by the conventionally-thinking, and you can succeed to heights you never thought possible.


Copyright 2008 William Davis, MD
Tags :

Comments (10) -

  • Ross

    5/25/2008 3:55:00 PM |

    I'm very excited to read what sounds like a possible change in your position on saturated fat (agreed: it's only one of a list of many other beneficial dietary practices, and I shouldn't focus too much on that one).  

    My own substantial weight loss, achieved by substituting fat (and saturated fat) for carbs while keeping protein intake moderate, has been such a revelation to me.  It's been quite difficult to believe that what we've been told by dietary authorities is not only incorrect, but is most likely exactly backwards.  Fat has not made me fat.  Fat has and continues to make me full.  Being full got me to a BMI of 23.  Becoming slender again has restored my athletic performance as well as improving the blood markers that most of your readers track.

    Taken as a whole, this list of dietary advice might possibly be summed up as, "Enjoy good eating in moderation."  IMHO, at the end of the day, a balanced approach is an essential part of any sustainable lifestyle.

  • Anonymous

    5/26/2008 12:58:00 AM |

    I have had what I consider great results with raising my HDL from 312 a few years ago following my physician's AHA recommendations to 51 now by doing most of the things you suggest in this blog (I am male).  My question is,  how good is this as a heart health indicator?  Even though your book suggests that only a scan will tell, I am nervous about X-rays and the cost of a scan.  Can I take some solace in my dramatically increased HDL?

  • Alan

    5/26/2008 3:15:00 AM |

    I almost totally agree.

    The only minor disagreement is that I would extend "wheat products" to include the other grains and starchy carbs. I am very cautious about all of that group.

    My major disagreement is the omission of Australia from your list of excellent dry red wine producersSmile

    Cheers, Alan, T2 Diabetic, Australia

  • Dr. William Davis

    5/26/2008 1:31:00 PM |

    Anonymous re: HDL--

    No, sorry, absolutely not. It is an indicator, not the real thing, meaning plaque.

  • Gyan

    5/27/2008 6:51:00 AM |

    If you advise eating saturated fats, then why specify "lean meats"?.

  • Anonymous

    5/27/2008 5:56:00 PM |

    What percentage of your patients don't respond to the HDL boosting therapy you advise?

    I raised my vit D level to 56, dropped wheat, increased exercise, took niaspan (albeit at only 500mg), took 3 grams omega-3/daily, took a wine extract supplement, ate  a small amount dark chocolate daily....

    And my HDL went down 1 point. My weight isn't an  issue, I think, as I'm 6'1"", about 175 lbs. My body fat is approx. 15% (not sure if that's good or not). I eventually had to drop the niaspan, as I was getting heart palpitations, but it didn't seem to be doing much for my HDL anyway.

    What is recommended for patients when their HDL won't seem to budge? And a better question... why isn't it raising on the therapies you recommend, when it does work for most patients? Are there any rare causes for low HDL, outside of genetically low HDL?

  • Anonymous

    5/31/2008 9:37:00 PM |

    I can echo the last post. I have tried all of Dr. Davis' strategies, plus others, and it's resulted in slight reductions in my already low ldl and triglycerides but no change in my low hdl. I'm in great shape, eat well, exercise regularly, no heart issues or risk factors besides the low hdl, which I assume in my case is genetic.

  • Anonymous

    9/13/2009 4:03:11 PM |

    I didn't know where else to post this question.  Is this true?

    "Another way to know if abundant HDL is valuable is to look at its particle size -- smaller is better. A large study has found that people with high HDL (above 70 mg/dL) but very large particles had more risk of heart disease than people with low HDL (under 40), probably because larger particles aren't as active. But again, there's no easy commercial test for that."  This quote appeared today at http://www.oregonlive.com/health/index.ssf/2009/09/you_docs_answering_questions_a_2.html.  Mehmet Oz is usually suspect to me, anyway, but I am still curious about this statement.

  • buy jeans

    11/2/2010 8:24:16 PM |

    --Adding back saturated fat. I say "adding back" since most of us (including myself) went too far down the "saturated fat is bad" path over the past few years. While I do not advocate a carte blanche approach to saturated fat, I believe that adding back eggs (preferably free-range and/or omega-3 rich), lean meats, and hard cheeses is a good idea. The saturated fat in these foods raise HDL 5 or more mg/dl.

  • generic viagra

    3/30/2011 6:46:57 AM |

    Cool Post !!!!!


    smith ALan

Add comment

Loading