Does staying up late make you fat?

Lack of sleep makes you crabby.

But can staying up late make you fat? Or diabetic? Or increase heart disease risk?

Can forcing your body to ignore its evolutionarily-programmed day-night/sleep-wakefulness cycle also distort health, even when sleep is adequate?

Yet another study adds to the growing clinical literature documenting the lack of sleep, or, in this case, the "violation" of circadian rhythms that occurs with unpredictable or shifting sleep patterns.

In this small study of 10 men and women, forcing them to sleep on an unnatural 28-hour per "day" schedule, causing a dyssynchrony with natural day-night cycles, yielded increased glucose (blood sugar) levels, poor response to insulin, increased blood pressure. It also led to a decrease in leptin levels, a phenomenon that can trigger increased appetite.

Such circadian misalignment was meant to recreate the distorted day-night cycles of shift workers, a group that is unusually prone to diabetes and heart disease. This study further confirms that there are indeed unhealthy physiologic consequences of defying normal day-night sleep cycles.

This study suggests that, not only is sufficient sleep important for health, but the predictability and concordance with normal circadian cycles is also important.

Add to this previous studies demonstrating an association with sleep deprivation and low HDL/high triglycerides (Kaneita Y, et al 2008) and increased likelihood of having a positive heart scan (coronary calcium) score (King CR et al 2008), and it is increasingly clear that sleep is a crucial factor for overall health. It may even be a helpful strategy to control weight.

A full report on the importance of sleep is planned for the Track Your Plaque website.

Comments (5) -

  • mike V

    3/3/2009 5:58:00 PM |

    I noticed that your Grassroots Health piece was *posted* shortly after 5 AM.
    Dr Davis, I know I am not alone in the hope that you are personally getting sufficient sleep!
    This hope is not entirely altruistic. We need you around here!

    Mike V

    (Incidentally, thanks for the Grassroots tip. I joined immediately when I spotted the list of star scientists supporting the group). From my point of view, it was well worth your "insomnia"!

  • Trinkwasser

    3/7/2009 2:38:00 PM |

    I wonder here about cause and effect, my "natural" daylength is around 26 hours anyway. There was a recent BBC Horizon programme about the body clock where one researcher claimed she saw higher BG responses after the evening meal and therefore people should eat their carbs at breakfast.

    Now in common with most Type 2s and many Type 1s my carb intolerance is far worse in the morning (I suspect diurnal variation in insulin resistance) so I'm wondering where she found these subjects. Are "normals" that different in their glucose response? I do best with low carb high protein moderate fat breakfasts and can do twice the carbs in the evening while maintaining normoglycemia, many people have a far steeper slope. I'm wondering if the lipids somehow slow the (pituitary) body clock. Certainly I sleep better and wake up better on low carbs.

  • mike V

    3/8/2009 4:53:00 AM |

    Trinkwasser

    Googling "diurnal insulin resistance/sensitivity" will produce plenty of studies about this topic.

    This British one suggests that individual diurnal variability is much greater in diabetics than in non-diabetics.
    *http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/25/11/2022*

    I imagine that you must already be well aware of other factors that could affect BG response such as gastric emptying rate, glycemic index of food and food combinations, food acidity etc.


    Mike V
    Note: I am neither diabetic nor a doctor. I do happen to have an interest in your topic, insulin mimetics such as cinnamon, sleep, the effects of melatonin, and possible connections with the other "western" diseases.

  • Trinkwasser

    3/12/2009 11:12:00 PM |

    Interesting stuff with some references I will chase up later, thanks.

    I also have a suspicion that IR at the muscle receptors and the liver/ alpha cells may also be decoupled. My lipids and BG readings tell me I have my IR under control but while I don't do Dawn Phenomenon as such I can still get diurnal variations in whether my liver will dump too much glucose when I don't need it (morning) or refuse to dump when I do (afternoon).

    I've learned to tweak my BG manually against exertion levels and alpha lipoic acid has also helped even things out. Long term a Primal type diet and learning to run on ketones rather than glucose as a primary fuel has helped no end. Siestas seem to give me a second peak in IR, I hadn't really connected sleep cycles to the dyslipidemia before.

    Dammit, when are they going to release Endocrine System SP1? We've been waiting millenia for this.

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 10:38:08 PM |

    Yet another study adds to the growing clinical literature documenting the lack of sleep, or, in this case, the "violation" of circadian rhythms that occurs with unpredictable or shifting sleep patterns.

Loading
Dr. Michael Eades on the Paleolithic diet

Dr. Michael Eades on the Paleolithic diet

Dr. Michael Eades has posted an absolutely spectacular commentary on the Paleolithic diet concept:

Rapid health improvements with a Paleolithic diet

The post was prompted by publication of a study that tried to recreate a Paleolithic-like diet experience over a brief study period:

Metabolic and physiologic improvements from consuming a paleolithic, hunter-gatherer type diet.

Dr. Eades discussion is wonderfully insightful and comprehensive and there's little to say to improve on his discussion.

I'd make one small point: From what I see in my experience, the improvements in lipid patterns seen in the brief period of this study are very likely to have been primarily due to the removal of wheat. Followers of this blog know that wheat elimination is among the most powerful cholesterol-reducing strategies available.

Comments (16) -

  • Scott Miller

    2/18/2009 10:13:00 PM |

    Without doubt, a primary benefit of the paleo diet is the elimination of grains (which contain inflammatory protein--gluten--and plant-defense toxins called lectins).

    The high (good) fat aspect of the paleo diet also plays a big role in increasing HDL and lowering triglycerides. These good fats including animal fats, saturated fats (mistaken painted as bad-guy fats), omega-3's, omega-9's (like olive oil and avocado oil), while greatly reducing the inflammatory processed omega-6 oils (corn and soy oil, among numerous others).

    The paleo diet also rules out any processed form of fructose:
    http://www.thorne.com/altmedrev/.fulltext/10/4/294.pdf

  • steve

    2/19/2009 1:41:00 AM |

    i have eliminated wheat and all grains as you have suggested and my lipid profile from recent NMR has improved: HDL jumped from 40to 54; LDLC of 94 up from 93, and Trg dropped to 20 from 37 and large HDL-P increased from 3.3 to 14.8, particle number dropped from1795 to 1305, but they still remain all small particles.  LDL particle size unchanged at 19.7. So some good things from elimination of wheat and grains, but no change in particle size.  At 5'6" male and 145lbs, hard to lose weight.  Any suggestions on how to change particle size and lower number of particles further? diet is meat fish eggs poultry, whey powder, hard cheese, greek 2% yogurt and fruit and veggies, some red wine and dark(85%+ chocolate)  Vitamin D3 measures at 38(25oh). with family history, doc wants 20 mg Lipitor.  Excellent post in both cases. Perhpas Paleo not work for all, although Eades would say i should add more sat fat to diet

  • rabagley

    2/19/2009 8:25:00 AM |

    I love reading in more and more places that saturated fats are not evil!

    The word is getting out, and one of these days, dietary researchers won't have to apologize about their results or come up with elaborate strategies to make sure that they can't be perceived as saying that saturated fat might be (gasp!) good for you.

    Remember the Okinawans.  Previous generations of Okinawans are among the longest lived people on the planet.  Pork, fish, non-starchy vegetables (cooked in lard), and a little bit of rice make up almost all of their diet.

    Dr. Davis, it wasn't that long ago that you were very cautious about fats and saturated fats, but I've seen a substantial shift in your comments over the past several months.  I salute your resolve to really understand what is good for our hearts and then going beyond that by doing your best to communicate what you've learned back to everyone who will listen/read.

  • Anonymous

    2/19/2009 12:40:00 PM |

    This is the first time I have seen someone call out Gluten as the component of wheat that causes inflammation response.  Good to know as it is often a primary source of protein for vegetarians.

    I don't see the fructose argument though.  This is a simple sugar that is broken down to glucose in the digestive tract like any other sugar eaten; according to high-school human biology......

  • Tom

    2/19/2009 2:16:00 PM |

    Dr Davis,

    Do low carb eaters need to be concerned about the aging effects of oxoaldehydes such as methylglyoxal?

    I read recently that the concentration of such compounds increases during ketosis and that they are much more reactive than glucose, readily forming protein cross links which age the body.

    -- Tom

  • TedHutchinson

    2/19/2009 3:21:00 PM |

    Some people may be wondering how it was that eating wheat and other high fibre grains caused humans to become weaker, shorter and fatter.

    This paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6299329 Reduced plasma half-life of radio-labelled 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in subjects receiving a high-fibre diet.
    unearthed by Stephan at Whole Health Source, provides one possible explanation as it shows a high-fibre diet reduces the half-life of 25(OH)D3 thus speeding up vitamin d deficiency.

  • Nancy LC

    2/19/2009 5:30:00 PM |

    Yes!  I thoroughly enjoyed Dr. Eades commentary on that study.  Although I do wish that study authors wouldn't obsess so much over saturated fat.

    Steven from http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/ also did a bang up review.  His blog is also quite fantastic.  He did a series on Tokelau Island migrant studies that was very interesting.  They are a people that eat quite a lot of saturated fat, from coconut, and yet had virtually no heart disease.

  • Kevin

    2/19/2009 7:07:00 PM |

    I cut out wheat a long time ago but haven't had blood work recently.  If cholesterol has nothing to do with heart disease, why worry about it?  Why eliminate saturated fats if they're not contributing to atherosclerosis?

    kevin

  • Trinkwasser

    2/20/2009 3:41:00 PM |

    The wheat connection is interesting, it's far and away the worst grain for spiking my glucose levels, even wheat bran will do it.

    My athlete cousin is already showing signs of the familial insulin resistance in her thirties and while she stuffs her body with far more carbs than I do she has noticed a marked improvement from avoiding wheat.

    The horrible irony is that a diabetic colleague diagnosed my diabetes over twenty years ago and a friend who knew my diet suggested I might be wheat intolerant. My doctor wrote that I had "fanciful notions" and hypochondria. Now here I am. Meanwhile the GP died "unexpectedly" which was ironic

    I wonder if wheat has always been this (comparatively) toxic or if it's the modern strains specifically. Originally it was a transgenic cross, kind of natural GM, with far more chromosomes than is good for it, but has been majorly tweaked over the years to provide current yields

  • Maxx

    2/22/2009 3:52:00 AM |

    It's odd to me how often folks state that there's no proof that saturated fat intake causes heart disease. I know the standard arguments, I've read Good Calories, Bad Calories and many of the websites dedicated to disproving the lipid hypothetesis.

    But the fact is, there are quite a few studies that demonstrate that saturated fat intake IS associated with higher incidence of heart disease (not just cholesterol profiles).

    A few examples:
    http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/337/21/1491

    http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/337/21/1491

    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/70/6/1001

    The majority of the studies I've seen on low carbohydrate, high fat diets have all been pretty short-term and didn't actually measure heart disease. They just measured cholesterol and, occasionally, inflammation.

  • rabagley

    2/22/2009 6:16:00 AM |

    To Anonymous's question about fructose.  It's very important that you understand the metabolic pathway for fructose.

    Fructose is carried by the blood from your gut directly to your liver.  Once detected, your liver stops everything else and converts fructose to triglycerides.  It does this because fructose is a highly reactive sugar and is treated as a dangerous substance by your body.  Triglycerides aren't nearly as bad (but if you've been reading this blog, you know that they're pretty bad, too).  

    Most of the triglycerides are released into the blood (where they represent the wrong side of the HDL/triglycerides heart health ratio), while some small fraction remain trapped in the liver tissues.  If you keep hitting your liver with triglycerides (via fructose), and live long enough, those triglycerides get stored in the liver and you'll end up with fatty liver disease.

    Fructose is all sorts of bad news for your health.  Sucrose, HFCS, honey, cane solids, corn syrup solids, etc: all contain significant quantities of fructose, and over time, all pose a risk to your heart, your liver, and via insulin resistance and glycation reactions, your entire body.

  • Anonymous

    2/25/2009 3:57:00 AM |

    I am new to trying to understand the most healthy diet and just finished reading Dr. Eades book (who does not eschew whole grains in his meal plans).  I am reminded of Michael Pollan's comments that preface his book - 'In Defense of Food' in which he claims there is much ideology with regard to diet and nutrition.  

    I understand many people have strong opinions, but I am hoping someone can provide insight into this website that includes whole wheat as one of the most important foods in our diet -- http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&dbid=141.

    I am not asking this to be controversial, but would genuinely like to hear some factual counterpoints.

  • Ricardo Carvalho

    4/2/2009 10:58:00 PM |

    This is great news for the paleolithic community: the British Medical Association has just recognised the importance of paleolithic diets in this recent report (see pages 5/6): http://www.bma.org.uk/health_promotion_ethics/child_health/earlylifenutrition.jsp

  • geongia

    9/15/2010 5:56:36 AM |

    This is truly a great read for me!! I love the quality information and news your blog provides Smile I have you bookmarked to show this to all!Thanks.


    health

  • cheapcalorad

    10/29/2010 9:39:23 AM |

    I have read your article Michael Eades on the Paleolithic diet' good article The diet consists of an inflexible meal plan. The diet does not allow forsubstitutions or deviations

    Welcome to visit-

    best calorad products

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 9:58:13 PM |

    This is the first time I have seen someone call out Gluten as the component of wheat that causes inflammation response. Good to know as it is often a primary source of protein for vegetarians.

Loading
Turning plaque into profit

Turning plaque into profit

For reasons unknown to me, I received a solicitation to invest in a company called Prescient Medical, with a slogan that caught my eye:


Detect and treat heart attacks before they occur.


The glossy brochure details their technology development strategy:

Predict(TM) Optical Catheter System--A catheter introduced into the coronary artery during a catheterization procedure to determine whether a specific plaque or vessel area is "vulnerable," i.e., prone to rupture in future.

Protect(TM) Luminal Shield--A stent-like metal device deployed into the coronary artery at the region of vulnerable plaque to prevent future plaque rupture.

The company anticipates FDA approval for their systems by 2009 and sales to begin by 2010. They predict sales of $7 billion.

Let's stop and think about this for a moment. It seems to me that, rather than pursuing the market of another stent for a "severe blockage," this company is going after the untapped procedural market of vulnerable plaque. In other words, their technology (an optical sensor technology that emits and analyzes light wavelengths to map specific plaque characteristics) identifies plaque that may rupture in months or years, followed by implantation of stent(s) that presumably prevent plaque rupture.

Thus, conceivably, many 20%, 30%, 40% etc. "blockages", atherosclerotic plaques that do not block flow and thereby pose no need for a conventional stent, will end up with this new type of stent. One patient could therefore receive multiple "Luminal Shields" in a single procedure.

When would these devices be employed? One pathway I could conceive of that my colleagues will be sure to exploit is 1) identify plaque by CT angiography, then 2) bring patient to the catheterization laboratory and perform this procedure for whatever hot, vulnerable plaques are identified. In other words, symptoms are no longer necessary. Reduced blood flow is no longer necessary. An abnormal stress test is no longer necessary. All that is required is that you have plaque. If the plaque is then determined to be vulnerable, then it is stented.

What bothers me about all this is the emerging effort to exploit this untapped market--a big one--of early heart disease as identified by coronary atherosclerotic plaque. As heart scans have demonstrated, there is an enormous amount of hidden heart disease in this world. This company has discovered a way to turn plaque into a profit opportunity, much as the statin drug industry found a way to "turn cholesterol into money."

The conventional stent market has plateaued and now has been, to some degree, battered by the drug-coated stent argument. Prescient has found a new and significant market for procedures and stents.

Is this really necessary? Why does plaque have to become a procedural disease? Doesn't it make more sense that, if vulnerable plaque is identified, that clinical trials are then designed to develop treatment strategies that modify vulnerable characteristics? Shockingly, this has not been done to any significant extent. Instead, the easiest path to a profit opportunity is to implant a "Luminal Shield."

You and I are able to inactivate, disempower, and essentially shut down plaque, while others are working furiously to convert it into a procedural profit opportunity. I personally find this so distasteful that I would sooner endorse a high-dose statin strategy than this approach.

You can view a video of my colleague, Dr. Martin Leon, on the Prescient Medical website, (or click here to go directly to the video), talking about how this technology will "change the treatment paradigm of the interventionalist from reactive to proactive." Scary stuff. Dr. Leon has made millions of dollars (probably more like tens of millions of dollars) from his support of technology companies for the interventional coronary device market.

My hope is that word of the sorts of techniques we use in the Track Your Plaque program disseminate before this sort of luminal coating idiocy gets off the ground.

(In actuality, a different version of this approach has been available for years using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), another procedure that involves threading a catheter down each coronary artery during a catheterization procedure. IVUS can also cross-sectionally map a plaque's anatomy and identify "vulnerable" features, like a thin cap overlying a collection of semi-liquid fat ("lipid pool"). There has been some discussion of using this approach to identify vulnerable plaque followed by stent implantation, but it has never gotten off the ground and has certainly not found validation in any clinical study. By the way, any stent prevents plaque rupture, since by their very nature, the plaque contents are compressed, modified, and excluded to the exterior of the stent. Plaque rupture within a stent is very rare in its few millimeters of length. It may therefore not require some new technology to prevent plaque rupture.)

Comments (7) -

  • Cindy Moore

    2/4/2008 1:38:00 AM |

    Well, I've heard of some, diabetics all I think, who have had a cath done and ended up with stents simply because they are diabetic.  No symptoms, just high cholesterol and diabetic.  

    I know one woman who has 2 50% blockages and has been told she needs a bypass ASAP....and completely asymptomatic. (her's was diagnosed by ultrasound, external ultrasound too, does that sound right? can they see that degree of detail?)

  • Dr. Davis

    2/4/2008 1:10:00 PM |

    Hi, Cindy--

    No, ultrasound cannot visualize coronary arteries. But they can visualize the left ventricle. Perhaps she had an abnormal left ventricle that provided presumptive evidence of poor flow. But that's just my guess.

  • Anonymous

    2/4/2008 3:36:00 PM |

    This post reminds me of how trusting people can be with hospitals and magazine articles, even when they suspect something might be wrong.  

    When it comes to investments it always amazes me how people can trust strangers to invest their hard earned money.  A person might read a magazine article about a "hot investment", or maybe a stock broker mentions the companies latest recommendations from their company "research experts".  And without much thought and no research of their own people will happily hand over cash with out really knowing what investment they are buying into.    

    It is a different reaction if a stranger off the street came to you and said he/she knows of a fantastic investment you should buy into.  If that happened, you would naturally be cautious.  If you did not dismiss the stranger outright, you would ask questions, want to know what kind of success the stranger had in the past, details about the investment, and what was their definition of success?  

    I've been talking with a lady who's husband has heart disease.  She learned of my heart healthy diet and felt a need to give me her negative unsolicited thoughts.  She reads magazines and tells me of the latest procedures or drug possibilities being developed.  She does not think highly of her husbands doctors. Up until the other day I had not heard her say a kind word about any doctor.  "They don't know what they are doing!" she would tell me.  I told her about TYP and the great information she could learn from the web sight,and the success many are having with reversing heart disease, but TYP did not interest her.  Her doctor had not told her of CT scans, lipoprotien testing.  Even learning from me about heart healthy supplements and diet held little to no interest for her.          

    The other morning she told me her husband had a check-up and the doctor told him he was doing "fantastic".  I nodded and said that was great, I hope he has continued success.  I walked away thinking what I really wanted to say - why do you still trust so much?  Did you ask for your husbands doctors definition of fantastic?  Is it fantastic because he has enriched the hospital with procedure after procedure?

  • Dr. Davis

    2/4/2008 5:44:00 PM |

    Yes. Well said.

    As you point out, most people regard the absence of symptoms the same as health. Of course, that's not even close to the truth.

    The emerging phenomenon of self-empowerment in health will make for great confusion as well as great opportunity.

  • Thomas

    2/5/2008 1:00:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    A little bit off the main thread, but what do you think are the chances of having completely clear coronary vessels if you have a heart scan score of zero?

  • Dr. Davis

    2/5/2008 1:24:00 AM |

    Thomas--

    The chances are excellent. The likelihood of uncalcified plaque and the risk of coronary events like heart attack is exceptionally low.

    There are exceptions when symptoms are present or certain forms of lipid (cholesterol) abnormalities are present, but they are indeed exceptional. Please read the Track Your Plaque Special Report, What if my heart scan score is zero?

  • Anonymous

    3/22/2008 3:25:00 PM |

    Sad but its all about the money now. After my 3rd visit to er room last dec 04 I had them unplug me and walked slowly out of the cath lab...Dr. said I needed bypasses etc., but I refused...plus the 10,000 for all the drugs was a bit much...3 bags of morphine was the cheapest........read your book after scan and have been doing good so far so guess 2 of the 4 stents from 03/1999 are not blocking anymore plus nitro use is way down now going into the 4th yr.

    Was going to make appt. but with the weather so bad I'm just staying put and reading all this stuff. Would like to say my BP is lower now that am low carbing and no atenolol or altace needed so what you eat does make a big difference.

    Hope you keep this site going as its really helping me a lot. I'm so far keeping the right neck flowing at 50% after operation, the left still no flow and not operatable now. Good luck and keep the info coming....Roaming

Loading