Almonds are the new wheat

Once you eliminate this genetically-altered Frankengrain called modern wheat, the diet should center around vegetables, nuts, healthy oils like olive and coconut, fish, meats, cheese, olives, avocados and other real whole foods. This is, in fact, the diet that I have advocated in my heart disease prevention practice, as well as my online program for prevention and reversal of heart disease.

But what if you'd like a piece of cheesecake or a nice slice of dessert bread---but you don't want to gain two pounds, spend 48 hours in the bathroom suffering with diarrhea and cramps, 3 weeks of joint pains and leg swelling, wade through mental "fog," anxiety, and rage just because you had that momentary indulgence---as you would with wheat?

That's why I've been focusing on recipes that allow you to have something familiar, e.g., chocolate coconut bread or biscotti, but using ingredients that will not generate the metabolic contortions triggered by wheat.

On perusing these recipes, you will notice that there are recurring ingredient themes. Many of the same ingredients pop up time and again. Among the most frequent, versatile, user-friendly, and tasty: Almonds.

You can use almonds as ground whole almonds, ground blanched almonds for a finer texture, ground roasted almonds, almond butter (though, for maximum health benefits, I prefer the ground whole almonds). Ground almonds allow you to recreate muffins, breads, scones, pizza crust, pie crust, biscotti, and cookies with health benefits that exceed that of whole wheat---but with none of the downside: no weight gain, no high blood sugar, no triggering of small LDL particles (#1 cause of heart disease in the U.S.), no accumulation of visceral fat, no appetite stimulation.

In short, you just have your chocolate almond biscotti or mocha cupcake and enjoy it, no health price to pay. So I call almonds the new wheat, except better.

Comments (31) -

  • Amanda

    9/29/2011 1:29:06 AM |

    Would you have to grind them by hand as to not lose nutritional value or can you use a food processor etc? Thank you for sharing, You have definitely change my families life for the better!

  • Teresa

    9/29/2011 1:38:10 AM |

    This seems like a good place to tell you - I tried making the almond biscotti  with ground flax seed.  The result was more like tiny bread loaves rather than crisp cookies.  The dough was very moist.  I haven't tried again with less liquid, or cooking longer.  They still tasted good.

    Teresa

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/29/2011 3:12:50 AM |

    Yes, Teresa: Just try reducing the liquids a bit. You could also extend cooking time by a few minutes.

    The result should be crispier, if that is what you desire.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/29/2011 3:13:34 AM |

    Hi, Amanda--

    You can grind them by hand OR food processor. Or you could just buy them pre-ground, in which case they shouldn't sit around too long to minimize oxidation. of the oils.

  • Linda

    9/29/2011 8:23:02 AM |

    Hi. I have swopped normal bread to almond bread for my five year old daughter and she loves it and her stomach is never swollen anymore, but now I been told that almonds is very high in phytic acid. Is this something I need to worry about? Have been following your blog since I started LCHF here in Sweden in jan. Lost 10kg slowly but without effort.
    Thanks Linda

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/29/2011 11:22:50 AM |

    Hi, Linda--

    I really do believe that we have to pick our battles. Obviously, eliminating wheat is such an enormous issue for digestive health that just taking that step eliminates many, many health problems.

    I am not convinced that the phytate issue is truly important, provided your diet is otherwise healthy and wheat-free. Note that just about every food we eat has some negative aspect, e.g., lipoxidation products in meats, goitrogens in broccoli and cauliflower, aflatoxin in peanuts, lectins in plants, etc. Because we've got to eat something and most of these effects have no real-world consequences, I think that nuts are, for the majority, a great part of the diet.

    Also, note that, epidemiologically, nut-consuming people live, on average, 2 years longer than non-nut consuming people.

  • nina

    9/29/2011 11:49:31 AM |

    Kent Altena (Atkins Diet Geek) has some great videos showing how to adapt recipes to substitute almonds and flax seed for wheat:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjmO4BIHPhk

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEaZCHWLiTI&feature=related

    He's certainly helped me eliminate wheat from my diet entirely.  (Does a mean wiener schnitzel too.)

    Nina

  • marilynb

    9/29/2011 12:09:34 PM |

    I have not missed wheat a bit since discovering almond flour, coconut flour and flax seed meal.  It's all great stuff and I think it's more filling than wheat, too.

  • Kathy Halol

    9/29/2011 12:40:30 PM |

    Here is a simple recipe for Pancakes:

    2 cups almond meal (Trader Joe's has the best price)
    1 can coconut milk
    1 tsp cinnamon
    1 tsp vanilla
    6 eggs
    a little salt
    Mix wet and dry ingredients and then combine.  Fry in coconut oil.  I boil down some frozen mixed berries to which I add a little xantham gum or chia seeds to thicken.  I also add a little stevia to sweeten.  Then I put this over the pancakes with some whipped cream.  They keep in the fridge beautifully and then you just microwave them to heat up again and you have a quick and easy breakfast.

  • Steve S

    9/29/2011 2:20:25 PM |

    I would not replace all the wheat products you once ate with nuts. I consider them treats. A very good article on the phytic acid in nuts:
    http://chriskresser.com/another-reason-you-shouldnt-go-nuts-on-nuts

  • Josh

    9/29/2011 2:23:28 PM |

    No health price, for most people perhaps. But some people are allergic to tree nuts including almond, or allergic to peaches, which are related to almonds. It's actually fairly common. Why can't we for once pick a staple food that everyone can always eat (if such a food exists)?

  • Aitor Calero García

    9/29/2011 2:54:52 PM |

    What about the phytates and high omega-6? I guess that nuts, in an evolutionary perspective was consumed sparingly and in seasson. Now we have almonds (or nuts) every day. What do you think about that?

    BTW, greetings from Spaing, and great blog!

  • Fat Guy Weight Loss

    9/29/2011 3:59:36 PM |

    Just made a batch of pumpkin muffins last night, I really like them but haven't got the kids convinced yet..I am sure if I slathered them with chocolate frosting they would find them more appealing.  They did like the pizza crust and waffles using almond flour though.  Trader Joes has almond meal for around $4 a pound, beats the $12 a pound they are trying to charge for the same things at the grocery store.

  • Whoosh

    9/29/2011 4:41:28 PM |

    When I first read that headline of yours "Almonds are the new Wheat", I thought, 'Oh no hear we go he's about to denounce Almonds as the new evil'!

    Was glad to see my fears dispelled.

  • damaged justice

    9/29/2011 5:26:42 PM |

    Every day is just trading a big problem for an arguably much lesser problem, especially if you use these nut flours as many do to serve as recreations of traditional desserts and thus carriers of sweeteners. But if they're an occasional treat and not a staple source of calories, most people shouldn't have significant problems.

  • Abhi

    9/29/2011 5:35:00 PM |

    HahahaSmile  I too thought that way... but now I know!  We too love our almond meal pizza and almond flour muffins.

  • Mer

    9/29/2011 8:16:52 PM |

    HA! I was also going to comment that Dr Davis has done such a good job of teaching me that "wheat" is a bad word that when I read the title of this post I also immediately thought that almonds were now being ex-communicated! Phew!

  • Alan

    9/29/2011 10:44:11 PM |

    6 eggs? I do a similar recipe with 1 egg, and it comes out great. Seems like a bit heavy on the eggs.

  • AnnieBee

    9/30/2011 1:59:46 PM |

    Me too!  Was scared for a second!
    And I must check out that recipe...

  • AnnieBee

    9/30/2011 2:01:49 PM |

    Mine came out crisp and wonderful!
    I think there's a lot of flexibility in the recipe (which I like) to make substitutions (such as using coconut milk) and agree that you can play with it!  Playing with the recipe is a great excuse to make it again!

  • ibh

    9/30/2011 2:23:07 PM |

    I am confused? Can someone explain the difference in almond butter and ground almonds. I buy an almond butter, that the only ingredient is "organic ground raw unblanhed almonds". I have also gone to Whole Foods and had almond butter ground from raw almonds made on the premises by yourself. How is this different nutrient wise from eating almonds. If there is nothing added to the butter, what is the difference, if there is any.
    Almonds are and have been for over a year now an important part of my wheat free gluten free diet (celiac condition). My lipid profile is great, with my historically low HDL at 27 having almost doubled to 48. For me, that is good. Any response would be appreciated.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/1/2011 1:57:20 PM |

    Hi, IBH--

    The only difference is that the butter is more finely ground. When you grind almonds, it first turns to ground almonds, then to almond butter if you continue.

    By the way, don't neglect your vitamin D; it usually causes HDL to go way, way up, though it can take over a year to do so.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/1/2011 2:11:02 PM |

    Relax, Mer! Yes, almonds are a good thing.

  • ibh

    10/1/2011 4:55:54 PM |

    THX FOR THE RESPONSE AND TIME. YOUR BOOK IS EXCELLENT, AND I HAVE SHARED IT WITH A NUMBER OTHER CVD PATIENTS, OF WHICH I AM A GROUP MEMBER OF THAT CLUB.

    I HAVE NOT FORGETTON TO TAKE MY VIT. D3. THX TO MY DR. WHO BELIEVES IN TRADITIONAL AND COMP. MEDICINE, I HAVE BEEN BEEN ON 6000 IU VIT D3 FOR LAST 8 MONTHS. I STARTED, PRE SUPPLEMENTATION AT VIT D3 LEVEL OF 12, CRAZY LOW. NOW IT IS AT 45. JUST STARTED TO INCREASE TO 7000 IU/DAILY TO TRY TO GET TO THE 50-60 LEVEL.
    THX FOR YOUR BLOG AND RESPONSE TO MY AND OTHER QUESTIONS.

  • Mary A

    10/2/2011 5:05:03 AM |

    Are these recipes in a book form or are they scattered amongst the Dr. Davis' many blogs?  If there isn't a recipe book available, I hope, Dr. Davis, there is one in the making (in your spare seconds).  I just love your blogs.  Thank you very much.  You do us all a great service.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/2/2011 2:34:36 PM |

    Hi, Mary--

    I hear you!

    In addition to the recipes scattered in the blogs, there are about 40 in the Wheat Belly book, another 40 or so in the Track Your Plaque Recipe book.

    My publisher, Rodale, has also mentioned the idea of a cookbook as the next in the Wheat Belly "series," but nothing final just yet.

    It's nice to hear that you are enjoying them. After all, I'm no chef nor gourmet; I'm just trying to find a healthy path for everyone while enjoying some recrafted healthy dishes.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/2/2011 2:41:47 PM |

    You're welcome, IBH!

    Isn't it surprising that many of the answers to heart disease are 1) so simple, and 2) the OPPOSITE of conventional advice?

  • DShark

    10/26/2011 1:36:18 PM |

    Hello - could you provide your recipe for almond meal pizza?
    Thank you!

  • Joan Mercantini

    11/6/2011 9:03:38 PM |

    Check out the Hybrid Pizza on Stuff I Make My Husband blog. The crust for this pizza contains eggs, mozzarella cheese and coconut flour, etc.
    I usually use a combo of coconut and almont flour.   Her article the Great Pizza Experiment is awesome

  • Joan Mercantini

    11/6/2011 9:08:13 PM |

    Can you put a limit on the amount of baked goods i.e. almond flour muffins, cookies  per day that we should consume

Loading
No high blood pressure

No high blood pressure

Primitive cultures that were, until recently, unexposed to the modern world, reveal some important insights into blood pressure.

The Yanomamo of South American, the Xingu Indians of Brazil, rural Kenyans, and the natives of Papua, New Guinea have average blood pressures of 103/63 mmHg. Even more incredibly, while 90% of modern Americans will develop high blood pressure as they age, the members of these primitive cultures do not develop age-related hypertension.

What's the secret? Perhaps the full "secret" of their remarkably low blood pressure has not been fully unraveled, but several observations have emerged:

--They are not exposed to modern processed foods like pretzels, crackers, and breakfast cereals.
--Low-carbohydrate foods. Carbohydrates are largely the product of the food industry, convenience foods bought in stores. No such thing in the jungle.
--Living outdoors, having to forage and hunt, walk to your destination, not drive or wait in line for food.
--Outdoor lives, wearing little more than a few strands of clothing, exposes you to plentiful vitamin D activation from sunlight exposure.
--Consuming wild game, rich in omega-3 fatty acids, enhances endothelial health and reduces blood pressure.
--Wild plants, roots, and berries, as well as wild game, along the coast, are richer in iodine.

The studies examining the habits of the Yanomamo and other primitive cultures focused principally on sodium intake. Indeed, the very low sodium intake of primitive cultures was associated with lower blood pressure--up to 6 mmHg reduction. But there's clearly more to learn than "cut your salt."

Comments (20) -

  • Mark

    10/14/2009 6:03:59 PM |

    Wonder what their life span is....

  • Barkeater

    10/14/2009 7:08:48 PM |

    Following the TYP program, my blood pressure (not bad to start - 114/72 was typical) has dropped to Yanomamo levels - 102/60 now being a typical reading.  Vit D, Vit K2, fish oil, low low wheat, krill oil, magnesium and a multi vitamin; weight loss may figure in too.

  • Jenny

    10/14/2009 8:36:13 PM |

    Don't leave out the other explanation for this: Quoting from Napoleon A. Chagnon. Yanomamo: The Fierce People (Chagnon lived with them).

    "The villages can be as small as 40 to 50 people or as large as 300 people, but in all cases there are many more children and babies than there are adults....Life expectancy is short. ...The Yanomamo are still conducting inter-village warfare, a phenomenon that affect all aspects of their social organization, settlement pattern, and daily routines. It is not simply 'ritualistic' war: at least one-fourth of all adult males die violently."

    If only the toughest babies survive and if males don't live much past their 30s you won't see all that much high blood pressure.

    The fact is American life expectancy--despite our diet--is dramatically better than that of any traditional society studied.

  • malcolm

    10/14/2009 10:42:55 PM |

    how do they do it??

  • Anonymous

    10/14/2009 11:19:54 PM |

    I'm 56.  I used to have average blood pressure of 140/95 when I was 40.  Ten years ago I dropped grains and dairy and have gradually transitioned to a carnivorous diet.  My blood pressure is now in Yanomamo territory.  

    In America it's "normal" for blood pressure to rise with age since it's "normal" to be sick here!

  • Anonymous

    10/15/2009 1:04:00 AM |

    I remember a tv documentary about salt, the sources of salt and use by humans since the early days of human civilizations. The Romans used salt as their currency to pay their soldiers. They also analyze and determined the salt intake of different ethnic groups. The question was also raised as whether salt is needed for human survival.  By this they mean, use of table salt in a shaker, added to our food during cooking. What they found is that this tribes in the Amazon, never use salt or even seen a table salt as we do in the civilized world. Their only source of salt(sodium) is whatever is present, in the game meats, plants and fruits they consume. Also the relative ratio between K and Na is 1:1 ratio or probably, a higher ratio of potassium than sodium.

    The foods being consumed in our society, especiaaly processed foods are full of salt, and most among us use a salt shaker every time we eat.

    kasing12

  • Anonymous

    10/15/2009 5:44:02 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    Read your blog regularly and I know you dismiss the Ornish diet - however, saw that in his 2007 book, Dr. Ornish claims that he had a heart scan and his score was 0.  Do you find that at all compelling?

    Thanks,
    David

  • Peter

    10/15/2009 10:48:27 AM |

    I lived in a hunter gathering society for 2 years and I was struck by how low stress it was: except for the couple hours a daywhen people were going after food, they hung out and chatted.

  • susan allport

    10/15/2009 1:13:09 PM |

    I thought you would be interested in this new take on omega-3s in Prevention Magazine: http://health.msn.com/nutrition/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100245164

  • Scott W

    10/15/2009 1:38:32 PM |

    I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that jungle diets are low-carb. Especially in New Guinea, where an island full of people have historically been very hard on the animal resources, there has been great reliance on starchy tubers and other plant-based carb sources.

  • Chris

    10/15/2009 4:26:18 PM |

    Off topic, couldn't find an e-mail address Doc, if you could address the following - maybe of interest to readers.

    I had a regular checkup and my ALT was 129 (above normal). I am on no meds. I am a non-drinker. Don't have fatty liver. I take 4000 mg of fish oil daily of house brand - warehouse food store gel tabs. I have read you saying that most fish oil is from fish not on top of the food chain - low mercury. My doc wants to repeat test in two weeks to see if lab screwed up, flukes, etc.

    My question is, do you think some cheapo brands of gel tabs could have other impurities that could cause liver problems? Thanks.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/15/2009 9:38:10 PM |

    Anon--

    Re: Dr. Dean Ornish.

    I don't believe that an experience of one can prove anything, good nor bad. The Ornish program does indeed work, however, for a small segment of the population, such as people who are apoE4 positive. For the rest of us, a low-fat diet is a destructive diet.

    Perhaps the best way to put it is: There are variations in what can be called "ideal" in different physiologic types.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/15/2009 9:39:22 PM |

    Chris--

    While we've not witnessed this effect, it doesn't mean it couldn't happen.

    The most common problem with "cheapo" fish oil capsules is breakdown products, otherwise known as rancidity. If it smells excessively fishy, I wouldn't take it.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/15/2009 9:40:40 PM |

    Hi, Jenny--

    No doubt. And there is more infectious disease, as well, not to mention traumatic injury.

    But the lessons are drawn from those who survive into later life.

  • Mike Turco

    10/15/2009 11:10:03 PM |

    These guys are (recently were?) the last surviving cannibal tribe. Not sure if they're still cannibals or have been lead away from that due to influence from the modern world.

  • Peter

    10/16/2009 9:39:27 AM |

    Re: the comment about the Ornish diet and Ornish's 0 reading on the heart scan, it's worth noting that Ornish has been railing against sugar and flour for 30 years, even though it's his anti-fats message that grabs people's attention.

    Nathan Pritikin, who did the Ornish diet before Ornish, was said to have arteries like a baby's when he died.

    It's worth paying attention to the way Ornish agrees with TYP as well as the way he doesn't,as both diets result in low scores.

  • Peter

    10/16/2009 9:58:51 AM |

    Jimmy Moore (livinlavidalocarb.com) and Dean Ornish both scored 0 on their heart scans, even though one eats meat all day long a la Atkins, and the other eats vegetables all day long and never meat, you have to wonder what they have in common.  One thing is they don't eat Oreos (and other stuff made with flour and sugar since it violates the rules in both plans.)  I wonder what else they have in common that led to 0 heart scan scores.

  • Health Coaching

    10/18/2009 7:58:46 AM |

    So does the sodium intake actually affect the presuure to make it go to the gigher side?

  • Medical Billing Software

    3/23/2010 9:07:41 AM |

    I absolutely agree...the modern life is a jungle of bad habits.packed foods and easier lifestyle with electronic gadgets.I believe in the old school but can not keep with it all the time.

Loading
Omega-3 Index: 10% or greater?

Omega-3 Index: 10% or greater?

We've previously considered the question:

What is an ideal level of omega-3 fatty acids in the blood?

Recall that omega-3 levels in red blood cells (RBCs), a measure called the "omega-3 index," have been associated with risk for sudden cardiac death:





In a recent analysis, 265 people experiencing sudden death during a heart attack (ventricular fibrillation, successfully resuscitated) showed an omega-3 index of 4.88%, while 185 people not experiencing sudden death during a heart attack showed an omega-3 index of 6.08%.

We have more ambitious goals than just avoiding sudden death, of course! How about the omega-3 index associated with reduced risk for heart attack? A recent analysis of females from the Harvard School of Public Health suggested that RBC omega-3 levels as high as 8.99% were still associated with non-fatal heart attack (myocardial infarction), compared to 9.36% in those without heart attacks, suggesting that even higher levels are necessary to prevent non-fatal events.

Most recently, another study comparing 50 people after heart attack with 50 controls showed that people with heart attack had an omega-3 index of 9.57% vs 11.81% in controls--even higher. (This study was in a Korean population with higher fish consumption. There was also a powerful contribution to risk from trans fat RBC levels.) The investigators concluded: "The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of fatty acid profiles was larger than that for traditional risk factors, suggesting that fatty acid profiles make a higher contribution to the discrimination of MI cases from controls compared with modified Framingham risk factors."

The data suggest that, while an omega-3 index of 7.3% is associated with reduced risk for sudden cardiac death, a higher level of 10% or greater is associated with less risk for heart attack. Surprisingly, fish consumption and fish oil intake account for only 47% of the variation in omega-3 index.

I believe the emerging data are becoming increasingly clear: If you desire maximal control over heart health, know your omega-3 index and keep it 10% or higher.

Comments (19) -

  • Medical Answering Services

    2/9/2010 1:29:37 PM |

    There are foods, which can easily lower the LDL. You should consume fishes. They are considered to be the greatest source of omega3 fatty acids. They can easily lower LDL levels and increase good cholesterol levels. In order to discard heart diseases, it is always advisable to eat high soluble fibers. You should consume lots of green colored vegetable, fruits and cereals to reduce LDL.

  • Matt Stone

    2/9/2010 1:38:00 PM |

    Thanks Dr. Davis. This is definitely very interesting. Would it be plausible that higher omega 3 levels are protectorant solely because omega 6 intake and cellular AA is so astronimically high?  

    I ask if you've considered this because there is a sect of researchers that believe, when both omega 6 and 3 levels are low, an even more beneficial and anti-inflammatory PUFA is produced in its place called Mead Acid.  

    Just wondering if you've encountered these ideas, and if so, why you've written them off in favor of achieving a high omega 3 level.

  • Ed

    2/9/2010 1:53:29 PM |

    My guess is the other biggest cause of variation in omega-3 index, after omega-3 consumption, is omega-6 consumption. Inversely of course. Dr Bill Lands writes extensively about this on his essential fatty acids education (efaeducation) web site hosted by the NIH.

    Does the omega-3 index likewise have the same striking correlation with stroke incidence?

  • Mike

    2/9/2010 4:28:58 PM |

    Dr Davis,

      Is there any issues with international orders for the O3 Index kit?  For myself, Canada specifically.

    Also, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on *over* consumption of omega-3s and the potential health hazards, if any, in a future post.

  • MontyApollo

    2/9/2010 6:36:37 PM |

    I'm kinda fuzzy on the interaction between omega-6 and omega-3. Would lowering omega-6 consumption increase the Omega-3 Index as well?

  • Will @ Fitness Achievement

    2/9/2010 6:55:06 PM |

    I've lost over 40 pounds so far with diet and exercise.  I blog at Fitness Achievement

  • Dr Matti Tolonen

    2/10/2010 9:52:14 AM |

    Harris and v. Schacky proposed omega-3 index in 2004 as a novel physiologically relevant, easily modified, independent, and graded risk factor for death from CHD that could have significant clinical utility
    http://tinyurl.com/ybxmor4

    In my view it is impossible to reach a 8-10% omega-3 index just by increasing intake of fish and other seafood. One needs fish oil as dietary supplements.

    The role of LDL cholesterol in atherosclerosis is a major misunderstanding. The mechanism of the disease is mainly chronic low-grade inflammation, and omega-3:s are excellent anti-inflammatory agents. JELIS demonstrated it nicely. The effect goes beyond cholesterol.
    http://tinyurl.com/ye55mfr

    E-EPA (1.800 mg/day), as dietary supplement, prevented angina pectoris, clinical myocardial infarctions and new cases of coronary heart disease in Japanese population, although they eat 5-6 times more fish and Americans.

  • brainpower

    2/10/2010 11:45:33 AM |

    And even more important: keep the Omega-6 low. One you do that, you won't have to worry so much about additional intake of omega-3.

  • Peter

    2/10/2010 5:16:11 PM |

    If fish oil does turn out to be the fountain of youth it will be bad news for the fish.

  • Alfredo E.

    2/10/2010 11:01:53 PM |

    Omega 3 and omega 6 should in a 1/1 ratio. In order to maintain that you need a low carbs diet and supplement with about 3.000 mg of fish oil per day.

    Commercial fish is loaded with omega 6, so is most of the meat you buy at the supermarket.

    So, in the real world you have to cut all grains, grain oils and take some omega 3 supplements.

    If any of the readers is interested in reading about omega 3 in spanish, please go to http://www.omega-3-fish-oil-wonders.com/omega3.html

    Best wishes,
    Alfredo E.

  • Healthy Oil Planet

    2/12/2010 3:44:26 PM |

    While fish oils are a viable source for omega 3 fatty acids, reports indicate krill oil may be a more suitable supplement for cholesterol lowering strategies.  

    A recent study on neptune krill oil and cholesterol found patients taking 500 mg. per day of Neptune Krill Oil experienced total cholesterol decrease of 19%, LDL cholesterol decreased by 44% and HDL cholesterol increased by 33%.  Study subjects who took 3 grams a day of fish oil supplements experienced Total cholesterol decrease of 6%, LDL cholesterol decrease of 4% and HDL cholesterol increase of 4%.  

    Fish oils do offer cardiovascular benefits, but it may appear Neptune Krill Oil could be a more suitable supplement for patients seeking more aggressive cholesterol lowering treatment.

  • Anonymous

    2/13/2010 2:20:51 PM |

    What a great resource!

  • tareq

    2/14/2010 5:10:28 PM |

    I ate fishes but fried them in sunflower oil but there was no benifit

  • Dr Matti Tolonen

    3/4/2010 5:19:52 PM |

    Here is the latest article written by Prof Clemens von Schacky about Omega-3 Index
    http://20.fi/3779

    Dr Pentti Raaste and yours truly have just published a small leaflet for prevention and self treatment of cardiovascular diseases http://20.fi/3780

  • TedHutchinson

    7/26/2010 12:25:28 PM |

    30-Days of High Omega-6 Diet--Stiffens Arteries and Increases Belly Fat

    I was shocked to see what happens when someone with a good omega 3 status changes to an omega 6 rich diet for a month.

    Now consider what happens when people have been consuming too much omega 6 in relation to omega 3 from  conception and throughout their entire lives.

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 8:44:26 PM |

    The data suggest that, while an omega-3 index of 7.3% is associated with reduced risk for sudden cardiac death, a higher level of 10% or greater is associated with less risk for heart attack. Surprisingly, fish consumption and fish oil intake account for only 47% of the variation in omega-3 index.

  • best omega 3

    2/2/2011 10:00:23 AM |

    That graph really shows how healthy omega 3 is. It is just a very amazing thing. I think taking omega 3 regularly will keep our body healthy.

  • Susan

    5/27/2011 4:39:02 PM |

    I discovered the powers of omega-3 when I was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. of course, that didn't cure me but I'm really better now on omega-3 supplemts. It's not eliminating fats what we need to be healthy (as many would say), it the RIGHT fats. I'm glad the healthy fats topic is getting more and more popular.

Loading
What is a desirable triglyceride level?

What is a desirable triglyceride level?


Though well-intended, the National Cholesterol Education Panel's Adult Treatment Panel, or ATP-III, (whew!) guidelines for cholesterol have been responsible for loads of misinformation.

The intention was to educate the internist or family doctor who treats sore throats, performs Pap smears, administers pneumovax vaccine, treats arthritic knees---and dabbles in heart disease prevention. The ATP-III guidelines are the "Cholesterol for Dummies" approach.

What standard guidelines definitely do not represent are the ideal values to achieve. They do not ensure protection from heart disease. This is particularly true of the ATP-III advice to keep triglycerides at or below the "desirable" level of 150 mg/dl.

In the Track Your Plaque program, we ask "What is necessary to tip the odds in favor of coronary plaque regresion or reduction of heart scan score?" This is not achieved with a triglyceride of 150. In fact, triglycerides at this level are associated with flagrant abnormalities of lipoprotein patterns. It usually means that processed carbohydrates, particularly wheat products, are occupying too prominent a role in your food choices. It could mean that you're making excessive use of processed foods containining high-fructose corn syrup. It will not respond to a low-fat diet. It will, however, respond vigorously to fish oil.

Triglycerides are a crucial aspect of your plaque control program. We aim for 60 mg/dl or less. The ideal level is actually 45 mg/dl. At this level, all abnormal triglyceride-containing lipoproteins finally go away.
Loading
"You've got 10 minutes"

"You've got 10 minutes"

There's a new trend in office healthcare in Milwaukee: Time-restricted office visits.



I'm told by several physicians who are employed by a major healthcare system here in town that they are peridically watched--physically watched by an administrator--to make sure that they do not exceed the allotted 10 minutes of time. My cardiologist colleagues, I gather, were at first incredulous at such intrusions into their practices, but apparently had no choice: They were employees.



Loading
Idiot farm

Idiot farm

The notion of genetic modification of foods and livestock is a contentious issue. The purposeful insertion or deletion of a gene into a plant or animal's genome to yield specific traits, such as herbicide resistance, nutritional composition, or size, prompted the Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international effort to regulate the safety of foods, to issue guidelines concerning genetically-modified foods.

The committee is aware of the concept of unintended effects, i.e., effects that were not part of the original gene insertion or deletion design. In their report, last updated in 2009, they state that:

Unintended effects can result from the random insertion of DNA sequences into the plant genome, which may cause disruption or silencing of existing genes, activation of silent genes, or modifications in the expression of existing genes. Unintended effects may also result in the formation of new or changed patterns of metabolites. For example, the expression of enzymes at high levels may give rise to secondary biochemical effects or changes in the regulation of metabolic pathways and/or altered levels of metabolites.

They make the point that food crops generated using techniques without genetic modification are released into the food supply without safety testing:

New varieties of corn, soybean, potatoes and other common food plants are evaluated by breeders for agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, but generally, foods derived from such new plant varieties are not subjected to the rigorous and extensive food safety testing procedures, including studies in animals, that are typical of chemicals, such as food additives or pesticide residues, that may be present in food.

In other words, conventional plant breeding techniques, such as hybridization, backcrossing, and introgression, practices that include crossing parental plants with their progeny over and over again or crossing a plant with an unrelated plant, yield unique plants that are not subject to any regulation. This means that unintended effects that arise are often not identified or tested. Plant geneticists know that, when one plant is crossed with another, approximately 5% of the genes in the offspring are unique to that plant and not present in either parent. It means that offspring may express new characteristics, such as unique gliadin or gluten proteins in wheat, not expressed in either parent and with new immunological potential in consuming humans.

Dr. James Maryanski, the FDA's Biotechnology Coordinator, stated during Congressional testimony in 1999 that:

The new gene splicing techniques are being used to achieve many of the same goals and improvements that plant breeders have sought through conventional methods. Today's techniques are different from their predecessors in two significant ways. First, they can be used with greater precision and allow for more complete characterization and, therefore, greater predictability about the qualities of the new variety. These techniques give scientists the ability to isolate genes and to introduce new traits into foods without simultaneously introducing many other undesirable traits, as may occur with traditional breeding. [Emphasis mine.]

Efforts by the Codex Alimentarius and FDA are meant to control the introduction and specify safety testing procedures for genetically modified foods. But both organizations have publicly stated that there is another larger problem that has not been addressed that predates genetic modification. In other words, conventional methods like hybridization techniques, the crossing of different strains of a crop or crossing two dissimilar plants (e.g., wheat with a wild grass) have been practiced for decades before genetic modification became possible. And it is still going on.

In other words, the potential hazards of hybridization, often taken to extremes, have essentially been ignored. Hybridized plants are introduced into the food supply with no question of human safety. While hybridization can yield what appear to be benign foods, such as the tangelo, a hybrid of tangerines and grapefruit, it can also yield plants containing extensive unintended effects. It means that unique immunological sequences can be generated. It might be a unique gliadin sequence in wheat or a unique lectin sequence in beans. None are tested prior to selling to humans. So the world frets over the potential dangers of genetic modification while, all along, the much larger hazard of hybridization techniques have been--and still are--going on.

Imagine we applied the hybridization techniques applied by plant geneticists to humans, mating an uncle with his niece, then having the uncle mate again with the offspring, repeating it over and over until some trait was fully expressed. Such extensive inbreeding was practiced in the 19th century German village of Dilsberg, what Mark Twain described as "a thriving and diligent idiot factory."

Comments (10) -

  • Jayzee

    6/12/2011 2:26:37 AM |

    Google Hinze Hogendoorn http://tinyurl.com/3t48zhf
    17-year-old Dutch undergraduate student Hinze Hogendoorn  has created scientific history with his simple experiments.

    is there ever any good news from the food science arena?

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    6/12/2011 5:20:15 AM |

    Metabolite screening should be done to compare with old standard and apparently is being done to some extent; there will always be someone who reacts adversely to what is innocuous to most people.  Since field agriculture is not free of  problems there will always be need for adaptations.

    Japanese daikon root pickle made today has a different degree of physiological benefit  than when made with a traditional old cultivar of smaller sized daikon.  Hinze's rats might have found old fashioned fare more appetizing but they don't have to struggle to produce it like hungry people worldwide must try to do.

    *  2006 article "Transgenes has less impact on the transcriptome of wheat grain than conventional breeding"
    Plant Biotechnology Journal 4, 369 - 380

    * 2006 article "Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars"
    Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry 56, 3057 - 3067

    * 2008 article " Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion"
    Proceedings National Academy Science USA 105, 3640 - 3645

  • Jim Anderson

    6/13/2011 7:31:13 PM |

    It's astounding that tests are not done -- are not mandated by law and international treaty -- on hybridized plants prior to the plants being sold for human consumption! One doesn't need to be a bio-chemist to see the danger there.  Of course, I have to wonder what kind of tests should be required.  Some dangers may not be readily apparent.  It could take a human generation or two for the problems to be recognized.  We are lab rats!

  • MK Davis

    6/14/2011 2:59:29 AM |

    Our number one forage crop is in danger of infecting the nation's livestock with an organism that is causing infertility in a large percentage of food animals.

    Don Huber Interview - Roundup Ready GMOs - PATHOGEN NEW TO SCIENCE.flv
    swirly78777@mypacks.net

  • MK Davis

    6/14/2011 3:09:49 AM |

    The URL to the Don Huber video is:  http://bit.ly/k25NpH

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/14/2011 1:01:36 PM |

    Thanks, MK.

    Anyone with even a passing interest in food and food safety absolutely need to view the video link posted by MK Davis (no relationship).

    Dr. Huber brings an incredible depth of insight into the glyphosate GMO crop question.

  • jpatti

    6/14/2011 1:40:02 PM |

    I'm surprised to see stuff about hybrid and GMO plants here.  

    I was an avid gardener before I became disabled and very gung-ho about using open-pollinated seeds, mostly heirlooms.   Even though I didn't save seed, I only bought open-pollinated seeds and plants in order to encourage their preservation by seed companies.  No F1 seeds for me, and DEFINITELY no GMO.  

    When you look into the history even a little bit, you realize even the so-called heirlooms are all pretty new plants.  

    It's been a very short period of time that sweet corn has even existed - corn was always a grain, not a vegetable.  

    Similarly, tomatoes used to be much more acidic than modern varieties are.  It used to be safe to can tomatoes in a hot-water bath.  But new tomatoes need to be canned in a pressure canner... or you have to add acid to the recipe to safely do the water-bath thing and avoid botulism.

    Also, most people have no idea how much yummier heirlooms are.  Vegetables for factory farming have been bred for things like uniform harvest by machinery, ability to keep in storage, not bruising when shipped across country, etc.  Not for TASTE.  

    A Brandywine tomato (my favorite heirloom) tastes NOTHING like what you can buy in a grocery store - because when individuals were doing the breeding, taste was a factor as opposed to  ease of machine harvest and transport and long-term storage.

    You can get good seeds from companies that have taken the No-GMO pledge... such as Baker's Creek Heirloom Seeds, Bountiful Gardens, Southern Exposure Seed Exchange, Pinetree Garden Seeds and Seed Savers Exchange.

    The largest problem is with corn.  Monsanto corn has a gene that makes the plant resistant to Round-up, their primary pesticide.  Even farmers who intend to raise heirlooms have found their fields pollinated by neighbor's Monsanto corn - and been sued since the gene is patented.  

    Farmers that raise heirloom seeds have to raise corn in very isolated spots, and good seed companies test each batch of seed to make sure it's not been infected by the GMO gene.

    Almost ALL corn available today is not only not open-pollinated, but not even normal hybrid corn; rather most of it is GMO.  There's a very few sources of things like non-GMO cornmeal and almost no sweet corn.  

    Same with soybeans - it's all pretty much GMO.  

    IMO, very good reasons to avoid these products in the diet.  I keep a small batch of non-GMO  cornstarch and non-GMO tamari for cooking purposes, but we eat very little corn or soy - and absolutely none of their oils.  Even the non-GMO stuff, corn is very carby, soy causes thyroid issues, and their oils are full of PUFAs. But the small amounts we use in our diet are absolutely non-GMO.

    I forget if it's been released yet or not, but there's a GMO alfalfa coming down the pike.  If the gene is as invasive as the corn gene is, soon it'll be hard to find pasture-raised meat and dairy that hasn't been raised on GMO feed.  

    The largest problem worldwide is in poor countries, where farmers traditionally saved seed to plant again the next year.  These folks literally cannot afford to buy seeds every year.  When all that is available is patented seed or hybrid seed, they are screwed in terms of being able to raise their own food.  People literally starve due to the geopolitics of GMO seed.

    Read up on Monsanto.  They're pretty damned evil.  Probably responsible for more infant deaths than even Nestle.  I personally won't buy products from any company that sells Monsanto products; it's really THAT bad.

    Well, I shall stop my rant now.  I've been ranting about this since back when I was in grad school doing recombinant DNA work myself... I'm getting bored with myself.  ;)

    I actually stopped by to drop off this link for you, Dr. D: http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/articles/diabetes-news/10953-common-test-predicts-early-death-in-diabetes-

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/15/2011 12:11:28 PM |

    Thanks for the detailed commentary, jpatti. Exceptionally well said.

    A return to the simplest forms of farming and plant selection are, I agree, are about the only ways to dodge all the genetic shenanigans provided by agribusiness. Scary stuff.

  • Lois

    7/11/2011 3:23:15 PM |

    Now we know who the snesible one is here. Great post!

  • Peter Defty

    7/21/2011 3:05:27 PM |

    Thank you! for stating a musing I have expressed for years! Plant breeding starting with Mendel has probably done a whole lot more than soem obscure snippet of gene insertion....not being a proponet here but I agree that a much larger point is missed......but this theme seems to run in a lot of directions in the health world like worrying about "SmartMeters" and their radiation when that cell phone, cordless phone and wireless signals are right there in their face......or how African-American kids in urban environments are asthmatic and all the potential causes make the news  EXCEPT that the notion that that high carb diet they most likely are eating is the main trigger......ditto for all the suffering this population group has later in life.....

    thanks for reviving this Mark Twain quote... to book end it  perhaps reviving Parkinson's Law would be appropriate.

Loading
What goes up can't come down

What goes up can't come down

According to conventional wisdom, heart scan scores cannot be reduced.

In other words, say you begin with a heart scan score of 300. Conventional wisdom says you should take aspirin and a statin drug, eat a low-fat "heart healthy" diet, and take high blood pressure medications, if necessary.

If your heart scan score goes up in a year or two, especially at an annual rate of 20% or more, then you are at very high risk for heart attack. If the heart scan score stays the same, then your risk is much reduced. These observations are well-established.

But more than 99% of physicians will tell you that reducing your heart scan score is impossible. Don't even try: Heart scan scores can go up, but they can't go down.

Baloney. Heart scan scores can indeed go down. And they can go down dramatically.

It is true that, following conventional advice like taking a statin drug, following a low-fat diet, and taking aspirin will fail to reduce your heart scan score. A more rational approach that 1) identifies all causes of coronary plaque, 2) corrects all causes while including crucial strategies like omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, and thyroid function normalization, is far more likely to yield a halt or reduction in score.

While not everybody who undertakes the Track Your Plaque program will succeed in reducing their heart scan score, a growing number are enjoying success.

A small portion of our experience was documented this past summer. (I collected and analyzed the data with the help of Rush University nutrition scientist, Dr. Susie Rockway, and statistician, Dr. Mary Kwasny.)


Effect of a combined therapeutic approach of intensive lipid management, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, and increased serum 25 (OH) vitamin D on coronary calcium scores in asymptomatic adults.

Davis W, Rockway S, Kwasny M.

The impact of intensive lipid management, omega-3 fatty acid, and vitamin D3 supplementation on atherosclerotic plaque was assessed through serial computed tomography coronary calcium scoring (CCS). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with statin therapy has not been shown to reduce or slow progression of serial CCS in several recent studies, casting doubt on the usefulness of this approach for tracking atherosclerotic progression. In an open-label study, 45 male and female subjects with CCS of > or = 50 without symptoms of heart disease were treated with statin therapy, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acid supplementation to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides < or = 60 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein > or = 60 mg/dL; and vitamin D3 supplementation to achieve serum levels of > or = 50 ng/mL 25(OH) vitamin D, in addition to diet advice. Lipid profiles of subjects were significantly changed as follows: total cholesterol -24%, low-density lipoprotein -41%; triglycerides -42%, high-density lipoprotein +19%, and mean serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels +83%. After a mean of 18 months, 20 subjects experienced decrease in CCS with mean change of -14.5% (range 0% to -64%); 22 subjects experienced no change or slow annual rate of CCS increase of +12% (range 1%-29%). Only 3 subjects experienced annual CCS progression exceeding 29% (44%-71%). Despite wide variation in response, substantial reduction of CCS was achieved in 44% of subjects and slowed plaque growth in 49% of the subjects applying a broad treatment program.

Comments (13) -

  • karl

    11/28/2009 8:01:01 PM |

    Where is this published?

  • Nigel Kinbrum BSc(Hons)Eng

    11/28/2009 9:09:40 PM |

    Has anyone investigated the effect of Vitamin K2 on CCS?

  • Dr. William Davis

    11/28/2009 9:23:30 PM |

    Karl--

    In the American Journal of Therpeutics 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):326-32.

    For abstract, go to Pubmed and enter "Davis + Rockway" into the search.

  • Dr. William Davis

    11/28/2009 9:24:14 PM |

    Hi, Nigel--

    There are no studies in which K2 vs. placebo have been administered, only observations studies in which lower K2 intake has been related to greater risk for cardiovascular events.

  • David

    11/29/2009 2:17:29 AM |

    Hi Dr. Davis,

    Do you have any insight into what separated those that had reversal from that those that had slow and rapid progression?

    Thanks,
    David

  • drake

    11/29/2009 2:24:04 AM |

    My cardiologist said essentially the very point of your first sentence.  I had pestered my PCP to order a heart scan a month ago.  He relented only by stating that I should then go see a cardiologist.  

    The cardio stated that scores can't be decreased unless "they change the software reading the scan."  He further stated, "calcium is calcium; where's it going to go?"  Needless to say, he placed very little value on heart scans but it made for some lively discussion between he and I.

  • Paul Smith

    11/29/2009 2:36:20 AM |

    Dr. Davis - I'm 36YO in Australia with a 50% blockage on my LAD (vulnerable plaque). I have 1 tiny spec of calcium on a branch of my LAD so not much of a calcium score. I realise this is a serious problem.
    I guess 'track you plaque' would be harder for my with such a low calcium score so I haven't joined up.
    I've been using your techniques for 3months now - I'm sugar and carb free and I'm very close to 60/60/60 as you have recommend.
    With reference to your most recent posting, what is your experience with Vulnerable Plaque reduction in people with low or no calcium score? Its a bit harder to track I would have thought? PS - TIP for new bloggers - don't take 500mg of Niacin if its the first time your doing it! Ouch.

  • Red Sphynx

    11/29/2009 2:59:29 AM |

    Wow.

    Any general insight as to why this worked so markedly well for some of your patients, less well for others, and not at all for 3?  Obesity?  Tobacco?  Stress? Not taking their meds? Diabetes? Working in a refinery?  Or is It more about choosing the right ancestors?

  • Anonymous

    11/29/2009 4:48:45 AM |

    A major question remains: "Why are some patients NOT responsive to the TYP protocol"?

    Is their coronary artery disease being driven by a different cause?

  • billye

    11/29/2009 6:12:09 PM |

    Hi Dr. Davis,
    As usual you always provide great information.  I have been following a life style change that features the diet of our ancient ancestors, with great results for the last 12 month.  I use saturated fats exclusively, including MCT and coconut oil, Weight loss 55 pounds, Diabetes type 2 cured (A1c's of 4.7,4.8,and 5.0 all without medication). My doctor stopped all Staten's. I recently received the results of a VAP test 11/16/09.
    Some of the pertinent results are:
    Tot. LDL-C Direct 154 mg/dl
    Tot. HDL-C Direct  63 mg/dl
    Tot. TG    Direct  63 mg/dl
    Sum Tot. Cholesterol 233
    Real-LDL sz. Pat. A large buoyant
    Remnant Lipo (IDL+VLDL3) 26
    HDL-2(large,buoyant) 18
    HDL-3(small, dense)  45
    VLDL-3 (remnant lipo)9
    Recommendation: Consider lowering LDL-C goal.

    Because I am not a doctor, I am having trouble analyzing this VAP test.  I have started a course of Usher Smith 500mg SLO NIACIN.  Any other suggestions?  Is this  enough to  
    lower my LDL? I very much value your opinion, any input will be greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance.
    Bill Eisenberg

  • Dr. William Davis

    11/29/2009 6:35:07 PM |

    Paul--

    I believe you may be misinterpreting what Track Your Plaque is intended to do. It is NOT  a program to reduce the amount of calcium in the coronary arteries; it is a program that uses the surrogate marker of coronary calcium as a means of reducing plaque.

    All the strategies we use in the program still apply, regardless of the proportion of calcium to non-calcified elements.

  • Anonymous

    12/8/2009 3:09:48 AM |

    new book is available when ?

  • buy jeans

    11/3/2010 10:05:27 PM |

    A small portion of our experience was documented this past summer. (I collected and analyzed the data with the help of Rush University nutrition scientist, Dr. Susie Rockway, and statistician, Dr. Mary Kwasny.)

Loading
When is a vitamin not a vitamin?

When is a vitamin not a vitamin?

When it's a hormone.

That's the stand that several researchers in vitamin D have taken and I think they're right. Dr. John Cannell has made a fuss over this in his www.vitamindcouncil.com website.

Structurally, vitamin D is most closely related to testosterone, estrogen, and cortisol. You wouldn't call testosterone vitamin T, would you?

Vitamins are also meant to be obtained from food. Yes, vitamin D is in milk but only because humans are required to put it there to prevent childhood rickets. Otherwise, the only substantial food source of vitamin D is in oily fish like salmon and then only a modest quantity.

Vitamin D is cholecalciferol, a hormone. Deficiencies of hormones can have catastrophic consequences. Imagine that every winter your thyroid gland shuts down and produced no thyroid hormone. You'd get very ill, gain 30 lbs, lose your hair, feel awful.

That's what happens when you're sun deprived and thereby deficient in cholecalciferol--you're deficient in a hormone. And it happens to most of us every year for many months.

I continue to witness spectacular effects by bringing 25-OH-vitamin D3 blood levels to 50 ng/ml with supplementation, including an apparent surge in success dropping heart scan scores.
Loading